One can be of course a grown up man and able to made a certain opinion on desired subject. Not always a "think out of box" is necesarilly apropiate, when the things are clear as they were before. The subject about national feelings in romanian's case is clear as day light. Since 1784 hungarians tried to acuse Horea as having a "Daco-Romanian" atitude and this is, from romanian point of view, ok. What is so bad from romanian point of view, to be romanian and to declare that you want so?
This is the idea for which peasants from Tara Motilor fought very soon in 1784, after their social revendications. A social uprising turned very fast in a national one, not only in Tara Motilor, but also in Salaj, Cluj and other counties. I can point some works as a proof, if wanted or needed.
One can ask why a fresh aproach for clearly researched subjects is needed? Just to have an oposite opinion, to be "different", to have a "frondă" atitude? Of course, if one want to do so.
The national feeling in romanian case is not sensitive, as knowing well our national history and knowing what our ancestor fought for, the romanian national conscience is a fact since long before writen colective memory and fact for which our ancestors died. There are too many well documented and writen works to prove that. Prestigious romanian historians as Silviu Dragomir, David Prodan and many others cleared the subject of national comunity of feelings long time ago. Their works are a statement that at least in Transylvania the national conscience was well developed and mantained in the harshest conditions, vivid and clear many centuries before our days.
The debate regarding romanian national conscience is just a subject of discussion for people who are not enough documented and it is exactly the same subject as it is the debate between romanian ortodoxs and greek catholics. Greek catholics from Romania says that if they didnt existed, romanian from Transylvania never became emancipated, for only greek catholics worked for raising schools and have access to learning. Not trying to make their deeds less valuable that they were, if one study enough, one can make the opinion that even without those greek catholic romanians, the course of romanian history in Transylvania it would be the same. Greek catholic wisemen apeared too late in our history to play such a significant role that they asume for themselfes. It is only a reason to defend their choose, to join a religion invented by austrians in late XVII century for orthodox nations as romanians.
The inittial programe went eventually into a national one.
Unless, of course, if all these four nations were descendants of Dacians and Romans.... 
What "insinuation" are you talking about?
