Printable Version of Topic
Click here to view this topic in its original format |
WorldWar2.ro Forum > Ancient, Medieval and Modern History > Banning DNA tests |
Posted by: Imperialist December 28, 2012 05:40 pm | ||
Here is the former Culture Minister's explanation for banning the DNA testing of the bodies of Wallachian and Moldavian princes/voievozi:
http://www.mediafax.ro/cultura-media/hasotti-nu-este-de-acord-cu-prelevarea-de-adn-de-la-voievozii-dinastiei-basarabilor-9793066 It's mindboggling! |
Posted by: bansaraba December 28, 2012 07:29 pm |
It would have been more useful to the Romanian history to establish the kinship of the occupant of tomb nr. 10 at Curtea de Arges to Mircea cel Batran. Provided that the few bones left in the tomb at Cozia are Mircea's. This way, we would probably know for sure if the skeleton is of Radu I or Vladislav I. |
Posted by: udar December 28, 2012 11:15 pm |
Hmm, apparently there was already made studies on Moldavian "domnitori" (Musatinii) http://www.ziuaveche.ro/stiinta-it/stiinta/alexander-rodewaldo-ev-mitocondrial-din-tracia-se-afl-la-originea-romanilor-9203.html <Acelaşi lucru a fost dovedit şi prin cercetările genetice ale doamnei Georgeta Cardoş, cercetător ştiinţific biolog la Institutul Naţional de Cercetare “Victor Babeş”, care a investigat mormintele domnitorilor moldoveni de la Rădăuţi. Geneticienii au demonstrat astfel că urmaşii lui Bogdan I nu erau cumani, aşa cum susţineau recent unii istorici din ţara noastră.> |
Posted by: Victor December 29, 2012 08:40 am |
I don't have Neagu Djuvara's book at hand right now, but as far as I recall the discussion regarding the Cuman origin of the princes was not about Moldavia, but about Wallachia. |
Posted by: Radub December 29, 2012 09:22 am |
What do they expect to prove with such "DNA tests"? There was a similar study before www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0041803 Radu |
Posted by: MMM December 29, 2012 05:14 pm | ||
Indeed! The book is mainly about Thoctomer ("Negru-Vodă") and there aren't references to the territory of the future Moldavia (or the "marks" in there) - which, btw, in the period in discussion, wasn't even mentioned! |