What fighter plane do you think Romania should use?

What exactly you don't belive?

A tenth of what are you saying.Actualy 90% to be more precise.

This post has been edited by Zayets on November 01, 2005 07:41 pm

So I'm a liar?
And what are the 10% that I'm not laying about?

This post has been edited by C-2 on November 01, 2005 07:46 pm

Are you?

That's what are you calling me ...
or not?
And there's agood way to find out if I'm a liar or you are not able to belive things you don't know ;
Send an email to a former member of this forum-Alexkdl.
He's a former F-16 pilot and can provide you some information.
But I think you won't belive him either.

This post has been edited by C-2 on November 01, 2005 08:02 pm

I very much doubt that.Besides, I believe what I want. I guess you don't have a problem with that.

This post has been edited by Zayets on November 01, 2005 08:22 pm

Not at all!

Gen. Eugen Badalan, head of the Romanian General Staff, said yesterday that Romania intend to acquire (mostly to buy) 48 fighters for replacement of MIG 21s but he denied any negociations on acquiring second-handed F16s from Israel.

On the other hand he admitted that there are discussions "with many" when he was asked about any discussions with other countries for acquiring.

From: http://www.jurnalul.ro/articol_39746/badal...de_avioane.html

There is no smoke without the fire...

See? and how would 48 f16 cost $150 mil? Even upgrade for 48 aircraft falls short using this amount.
On the other side, good news for the military, they got their budget increased

This post has been edited by Zayets on November 02, 2005 11:15 am

150 M would be ok as upgrade for 48 old F-16.
I mean the extend of modification needed by F-16 is not the same as it was with Mig-21.
Heck F-16 was the electric jet from birth...

We should cool down and wait further development.

What do you make of this:

http://www.averea.ro/display.php?data=2005-12-08&id=12838

They called themselves "reporters"

Check my post: http://www.worldwar2.ro/forum/index.php?sh...indpost&p=41063

I read it this morning. Nice to see a fragement there: "reporterii „Averea“ au descoperit ca 18 avioane MiG 29 (foto)" when in photo it is an F-16... And i ask myself from where they coppied more than 2/3 of the article?

Iama