Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (2) 1 [2] ( Go to first unread post ) |
Dénes |
Posted: May 11, 2009 02:27 pm
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
I believe your #2 point is inproper, in regards of (military) 'occupation'. Gen. Dénes This post has been edited by Dénes on May 11, 2009 02:27 pm |
||
Radub |
Posted: May 11, 2009 02:47 pm
|
General de corp de armata Group: Members Posts: 1670 Member No.: 476 Joined: January 23, 2005 |
Law of Occupation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_occupation
Radu |
MMM |
Posted: May 11, 2009 03:37 pm
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 |
Well, that "learned friend" met me for the 1-st (hopefully, also the last) time this saturday - and IIRC, he said something about "codul onoarei", whatever that meant for him; I fail to see the connection with 1940
I also guess that he, being a specialist on medieval history, does know a little bit more than you or me on that subject... That's what I thought, too about the flags - how could a unit parade w/out its flag? To conclude this "topic" let's just say that either I misunderstood what he said or he was just talking out of his hand-puppet instead of his head! -------------------- M
|
Pages: (2) 1 [2] |