Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> 307 Marine Battalion & SIG 550
Iamandi
Posted: August 02, 2009 06:16 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004



At wikipedia... i read that this:

" Romania: Small numbers of the SG 551 LB employed by the 307th Marine Battalion."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_SG_550

It is true or not? Anyone knows?
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Vici
Posted: August 02, 2009 06:32 pm
Quote Post


Caporal
*

Group: Members
Posts: 138
Member No.: 2455
Joined: April 18, 2009



Yes, they use it:
user posted image

as well as the short barrel version (don't know what's the exact designation, SG 551?)

user posted image

This post has been edited by Vici on August 02, 2009 06:34 pm
PM
Top
tomcat1974
Posted: August 03, 2009 10:14 am
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Members
Posts: 263
Member No.: 427
Joined: December 20, 2004



As always ... it seems that every one does what ever they want.
SOF use G-36, Marine Batallion Sig's , SPP use Steir AUG's...
PMEmail Poster
Top
Vici
Posted: August 03, 2009 06:29 pm
Quote Post


Caporal
*

Group: Members
Posts: 138
Member No.: 2455
Joined: April 18, 2009



At least they have the same caliber rolleyes.gif
PM
Top
Hadrian
Posted: August 03, 2009 09:11 pm
Quote Post


Sergent major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 245
Member No.: 875
Joined: April 09, 2006



Normally aquisition of a new weapon should be the result of a centraly led program.

On the other hand, are this new weapons or some surplus? This would explain the heterogenous colection of weapons.

The same situation appears when you look at the helmets. Some still use the old romanian helmet, some the new, some american-type PASSGT helmets.

This post has been edited by Hadrian on August 03, 2009 09:13 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
Stephen Dabapuscu
Posted: September 11, 2009 08:58 am
Quote Post


Sergent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Member No.: 440
Joined: January 05, 2005



QUOTE (Hadrian @ August 03, 2009 09:11 pm)
Normally aquisition of a new weapon should be the result of a centraly led program.

On the other hand, are this new weapons or some surplus? This would explain the heterogenous colection of weapons.

The same situation appears when you look at the helmets. Some still use the old romanian helmet, some the new, some american-type PASSGT helmets.

The 307th Marine Battalion has between 550-650 Sig-550's, I believe that they are new builds and not surplus!
PMEmail Poster
Top
Agarici
Posted: January 18, 2010 02:29 pm
Quote Post


Maior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Member No.: 522
Joined: February 24, 2005



See also here, towards the bottom of the page: http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showt...anian-Army-pics
PMEmail Poster
Top
contras
Posted: January 18, 2010 06:28 pm
Quote Post


Maior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 732
Member No.: 2693
Joined: December 28, 2009



QUOTE
Normally aquisition of a new weapon should be the result of a centraly led program.


It is true, but only for regular forces. Special Forces, as the forces attached to secret services, can made their choice about the individual armament they used in aplications and missions. For protocol and other public services (press conferences, defilations) they used standard weapons.
PMEmail Poster
Top
udar
Posted: January 19, 2010 10:51 am
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Members
Posts: 281
Member No.: 354
Joined: September 24, 2004



QUOTE (contras @ January 18, 2010 06:28 pm)
QUOTE
Normally aquisition of a new weapon should be the result of a centraly led program.


It is true, but only for regular forces. Special Forces, as the forces attached to secret services, can made their choice about the individual armament they used in aplications and missions. For protocol and other public services (press conferences, defilations) they used standard weapons.

Well, marines arent Special Forces, just some elite troops from regular forces, as mountain hunters and paratroopers. I think this was mostly a caprice of comander of General Staff, who is a navy admiral (a weird thing if it is by me, but this is probably due to the fact that supreme comander, the president, is a former captain on civil navy ship). I dont see any other reason to use that rifle (who, btw, has a diferent calibre then usual army rifles, so another logistic problems), especialy since i saw the real navy special forces (combat divers) using as assault rifle the PA md 86. And, if we'll go to 5,56x45 mm as all the army, i think is better to have a unitar equipment, and made localy. Just special forces to use anything they see fit for their missions, who can be (and usual are) different then regular forces, or in more diferent enviroments and situations (need silencers, weapons for close combat and hostage rescues or short enough to be hidden or not too cumbersome since they can carry a lot of other things with them, more then a usual soldier).
PMEmail Poster
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0083 ]   [ 15 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]