Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Iamandi |
Posted: August 02, 2009 06:16 pm
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1386 Member No.: 319 Joined: August 04, 2004 |
At wikipedia... i read that this:
" Romania: Small numbers of the SG 551 LB employed by the 307th Marine Battalion." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_SG_550 It is true or not? Anyone knows? |
Vici |
Posted: August 02, 2009 06:32 pm
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 138 Member No.: 2455 Joined: April 18, 2009 |
|
tomcat1974 |
Posted: August 03, 2009 10:14 am
|
Plutonier Group: Members Posts: 263 Member No.: 427 Joined: December 20, 2004 |
As always ... it seems that every one does what ever they want.
SOF use G-36, Marine Batallion Sig's , SPP use Steir AUG's... |
Vici |
Posted: August 03, 2009 06:29 pm
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 138 Member No.: 2455 Joined: April 18, 2009 |
At least they have the same caliber
|
Hadrian |
Posted: August 03, 2009 09:11 pm
|
Sergent major Group: Members Posts: 245 Member No.: 875 Joined: April 09, 2006 |
Normally aquisition of a new weapon should be the result of a centraly led program.
On the other hand, are this new weapons or some surplus? This would explain the heterogenous colection of weapons. The same situation appears when you look at the helmets. Some still use the old romanian helmet, some the new, some american-type PASSGT helmets. This post has been edited by Hadrian on August 03, 2009 09:13 pm |
Stephen Dabapuscu |
Posted: September 11, 2009 08:58 am
|
||
Sergent Group: Members Posts: 154 Member No.: 440 Joined: January 05, 2005 |
The 307th Marine Battalion has between 550-650 Sig-550's, I believe that they are new builds and not surplus! |
||
Agarici |
Posted: January 18, 2010 02:29 pm
|
Maior Group: Members Posts: 745 Member No.: 522 Joined: February 24, 2005 |
See also here, towards the bottom of the page: http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showt...anian-Army-pics
|
contras |
Posted: January 18, 2010 06:28 pm
|
||
Maior Group: Members Posts: 732 Member No.: 2693 Joined: December 28, 2009 |
It is true, but only for regular forces. Special Forces, as the forces attached to secret services, can made their choice about the individual armament they used in aplications and missions. For protocol and other public services (press conferences, defilations) they used standard weapons. |
||
udar |
Posted: January 19, 2010 10:51 am
|
||||
Plutonier Group: Members Posts: 281 Member No.: 354 Joined: September 24, 2004 |
Well, marines arent Special Forces, just some elite troops from regular forces, as mountain hunters and paratroopers. I think this was mostly a caprice of comander of General Staff, who is a navy admiral (a weird thing if it is by me, but this is probably due to the fact that supreme comander, the president, is a former captain on civil navy ship). I dont see any other reason to use that rifle (who, btw, has a diferent calibre then usual army rifles, so another logistic problems), especialy since i saw the real navy special forces (combat divers) using as assault rifle the PA md 86. And, if we'll go to 5,56x45 mm as all the army, i think is better to have a unitar equipment, and made localy. Just special forces to use anything they see fit for their missions, who can be (and usual are) different then regular forces, or in more diferent enviroments and situations (need silencers, weapons for close combat and hostage rescues or short enough to be hidden or not too cumbersome since they can carry a lot of other things with them, more then a usual soldier). |
||||