Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (4) « First ... 2 3 [4]   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> New Me-109 Book
Radub
Posted: August 31, 2012 10:03 pm
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



If it is an F, then it is not Romanian. There is not enough in the photo to tell the type for sure, but I can see that it is armed with MG17 guns so it is not a G-6. My guess is G-2 or G-4.
This caption is just a small "niggle", the book is quite good otherwise.
Radu
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
cainele_franctiror
Posted: September 01, 2012 07:38 am
Quote Post


Sublocotenent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 449
Member No.: 334
Joined: September 01, 2004



The plane it is not Romanian. The picture is from a photo album offered in late 41 or early 42 by the 1st Fighter Flotilla pilots to General Jienescu. All the downed planes from this album (also from the book) looks like being Romanian victories.
PM
Top
cainele_franctiror
Posted: September 01, 2012 07:44 am
Quote Post


Sublocotenent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 449
Member No.: 334
Joined: September 01, 2004



QUOTE (cainele_franctiror @ September 01, 2012 07:38 am)
looks like being Romanian victories.

I mean they are all on the same page

PM
Top
cainele_franctiror
Posted: September 01, 2012 07:56 am
Quote Post


Sublocotenent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 449
Member No.: 334
Joined: September 01, 2004



still I connot attach ...
PM
Top
muggs
Posted: September 01, 2012 10:17 am
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Retired
Posts: 298
Member No.: 1499
Joined: July 05, 2007



Use http://minus.com, just drag and drop the picture there and then copy the link here.

This post has been edited by muggs on September 01, 2012 10:17 am
PMEmail Poster
Top
Radub
Posted: September 01, 2012 12:42 pm
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



QUOTE (cainele_franctiror @ September 01, 2012 07:38 am)
The plane it is not Romanian. The picture is from a photo album offered in late 41 or early 42 by the 1st Fighter Flotilla pilots to General Jienescu. All the downed planes from this album (also from the book) looks like being Romanian victories.

Sorry... I do not understand...

Do you mean that this is a picture of a Messerschmitt shot down by Romanian pilots? How? In what circumstances? Planes of that type were used only by "friendly" nations at the time when the type was in use (Germany, Hungary, Italy). Did Romanian pilots shoot down a "friendly"? The Russians captured a few, but they never used them in combat.

A much more likely scenario is that it is a German F/G or a Romanian G that fell victim to a Russian airfield attack (or maybe crashed during take-off/landing).

By the way, if you ever need help with aircraft identification, please do not hesitate to write me a PM.
HTH
Radu
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
cainele_franctiror
Posted: September 01, 2012 01:46 pm
Quote Post


Sublocotenent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 449
Member No.: 334
Joined: September 01, 2004



http://minus.com/mKK9EToZC

thank you muggs.

Anyway, the tail assembly looks more like LaGG 3 for me. I mean the horizontal stabilising of an Me 109 is not below the ungle of the tail where the tail meet the fuselage.
PM
Top
cainele_franctiror
Posted: September 01, 2012 01:54 pm
Quote Post


Sublocotenent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 449
Member No.: 334
Joined: September 01, 2004



PM
Top
Dénes
Posted: September 01, 2012 03:18 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



I have this photo. By appearance, it's a Bf 109, either F or G.
If I remember correctly, it's an F used during transition to the "Gustav", but I need to double check it.

Gen. Dénes

This post has been edited by Dénes on September 01, 2012 03:23 pm
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Radub
Posted: September 01, 2012 04:44 pm
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



QUOTE (cainele_franctiror @ September 01, 2012 01:46 pm)
Anyway, the tail assembly looks more like LaGG 3 for me. I mean the horizontal stabilising of an Me 109 is not below the ungle of the tail where the tail meet the fuselage.

Look in the midle of the ashes. You see a trapese-shaped structure with two diagonal bars at the top corners. That is the windscreen frame of a Bf.109 and those diagonal bars are handholds.

But even without that "clue", it is evident because of the MG17 gun-throughs on the nose that it is a Bf.109.

As I said, this is not a big problem, so let us not make a big thing out of it. wink.gif

HTH
Radu
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (4) « First ... 2 3 [4]  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0093 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]