Reorganizing the pre-WW2 military section |  |  |
| Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines |
 Help
 Search
 Members
 Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (3) 1 2 [3] ( Go to first unread post ) |    |
Reorganizing the pre-WW2 military section| Carol I |
Posted: June 28, 2005 08:14 pm
|
||
 General de armata  Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003  |
This same war is also known in English as "The Great War" or as "The Great War for Civilisation". |
||
|
| Agarici |
Posted: June 28, 2005 10:16 pm
|
 Maior  Group: Members Posts: 745 Member No.: 522 Joined: February 24, 2005 |
I would personally opt for WW 1 formula. I think that for the foreign visitors the content of the topic should enlighten them about the particularities of the Romanian involvement in WW 1. The National Reunification War variant is quite new and seems unusual…
For my suggestion about the reorganization of this section of the forum (a new project) take a look here: http://www.worldwar2.ro/forum/index.php?showtopic=2253 |
|
| Victor |
Posted: July 05, 2005 06:11 pm
|
 Admin  Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
The reorganization is done. Hope I didn't leave anything behind.
|
|
| dragos03 |
Posted: July 05, 2005 06:16 pm
|
|
Capitan  Group: Members Posts: 641 Member No.: 163 Joined: December 13, 2003 |
Why did you choose the "WW1" version? The poll ended with a draw.
I voted for the other variant and i think the solution is unfair. |
|
|
| Imperialist |
Posted: July 05, 2005 06:36 pm
|
||
 General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005 |
I dont think the poll is even closed...! Only 20 people voted... thats roughly 3,3% of the members. -------------------- I
|
||
|
|
| Victor |
Posted: July 05, 2005 06:46 pm
|
||
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
Read Dragos' post on the first page of this topic, dated Jun 27 2005, 07:07 PM. The issue of the "National Reunification War" vs. WW1 was never meant to be in the title of the forum, but in the comments section. I left the comments section of that forum empty, until a conclusion in that poll can be reached. |
||
|
|
| dragos03 |
Posted: July 05, 2005 07:07 pm
|
|
Capitan Group: Members Posts: 641 Member No.: 163 Joined: December 13, 2003 |
Ok, that sounds fair.
|
|
|
| Imperialist |
Posted: July 05, 2005 07:20 pm
|
||||
|
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005 |
Yes, it was meant to be in the subtitle. So the poll is still open, right? Could it still be introduced as subtitle? Dragos wrote:
-------------------- I
|
||||
|
|
| Dénes |
Posted: July 05, 2005 07:30 pm
|
||
 Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
The poll's result, as currently is, is irrelevant, as in any context a sizeable number of participants must vote in order the result to have any statistical relevance. In a national referendum, for example, a certain percentage of persons eligible to vote must cast their votes in order the refrendum to be valid. This percentage is set usually between 25-50%. Over here, even 10% would be acceptable, I think. Moreover, a deadline is usually set, as well. Many forumites are simply not interested in this forced poll thing (myself included, that's why I did not vote). I believe Victor also voiced his pro-W.W. 1 opinion and probably he didn't vote either. And so on... Gen. Dénes This post has been edited by Dénes on July 05, 2005 07:31 pm |
||
|
|
| dragos |
Posted: July 05, 2005 08:25 pm
|
 Admin Group: Admin Posts: 2397 Member No.: 2 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
I have introduced the complete formula of "the War for Liberation and National Reunification"
|
|
| Victor |
Posted: July 06, 2005 04:44 am
|
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
Liberation? What Liberation?
 Why not wait for the poll to reach a conclusion? So far it seems there are 11 against and 10 pro. |
|
|
| MaxFax |
 Posted: July 06, 2005 06:25 am
|
||
 Plutonier  Group: Members Posts: 255 Member No.: 7 Joined: June 18, 2003 |
Forced thing?  Do I feel (again?) a kind of tendentiousness here?!  I see it more like a democratic option to have an idea about the members’ opinion. Well, till now it wasn’t too helpful … |
||
|
|
| dragos |
Posted: July 06, 2005 08:44 am
|
||||
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 2397 Member No.: 2 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
|
||||
|
|
| Imperialist |
Posted: July 06, 2005 10:00 am
|
||
|
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005 |
Thank you Dragos. -------------------- I
|
||
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Pages: (3) 1 2 [3] |
|
[ Script Execution time: 0.0581 ] [ 14 queries used ] [ GZIP Enabled ]
Powered by Invision Power Board(U) v1.3.1 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.