Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (2) 1 [2]   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Suffix for replacement ARR airplanes
1.JAVA_nijssie
Posted: May 17, 2006 07:35 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 37
Member No.: 662
Joined: September 04, 2005



so no (romanian) mechanics were trained for the new planes. ( if i understand correctly)

wich gives me 3 questions

1- the other (older) german planes like 109 e were they serviced by germans aswell?

2- with the romanian aircraft industry as it was i cant imagine that there were no qualified people that couldnt be trained (the fins did thier own serviceing, also on G type) why didnt the germans train romanian technicians?

3-After the romanians went on the allied site, who did the servicing then
PMEmail Poster
Top
D13-th_Toppy
Posted: May 17, 2006 08:16 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 29
Member No.: 372
Joined: October 17, 2004



Only the pilots joined JG3 and that only for a certain period of time. The only thing 100% Romanian in jg3 then were the pilots the planes and ground crews were supplied by the germans.

You might be confusing the things here... the 109E, and later G, were serviced by romanian crews but the planes flown by romanians along Jg3 had german crews. Romanina ground crews were trained and were used, but not in Jg3.
PMEmail Poster
Top
1.JAVA_nijssie
Posted: May 19, 2006 06:59 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 37
Member No.: 662
Joined: September 04, 2005



The point i was trying the get clear is why train only the pilots within a german jg?
PMEmail Poster
Top
1.JAVA_nijssie
Posted: May 19, 2006 07:02 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 37
Member No.: 662
Joined: September 04, 2005



To get back an the suffix: When romania changed sides was this systeem held?
PMEmail Poster
Top
Dénes
Posted: May 19, 2006 07:13 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE (1.JAVA_nijssie @ May 20 2006, 01:02 AM)
To get back an the suffix: When romania changed sides was this systeem held?

No, because obviously Rumania did not get aircraft from Germany any more. wink.gif

Gen. Dénes

P.S. Actually, a few captured ex-Luftwaffe aircraft were asigned suffixes following the Aug. 23, 1944 defection.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
1.JAVA_nijssie
Posted: May 19, 2006 07:27 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 37
Member No.: 662
Joined: September 04, 2005



hehehe no thats not what i mean. i mean why didnt they change the whole systheem if the systheem in the first place was to log german replacement planes.

source pic below: HS 129 Panzerjager! bij Martin Pegg

user posted image

user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
Dénes
Posted: May 19, 2006 07:48 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



The Rumanians just kept the existing tail numbers. Why change it?

Gen. Dénes

P.S. It was I who sent to Martin Pegg the photo of Hs 129 B-2, No. 222b.
P.P.S. The colour profile is not accurate, as it doesn't show the upper wingtips as white, despite the photo.

This post has been edited by Dénes on May 19, 2006 07:50 pm
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
1.JAVA_nijssie
Posted: May 19, 2006 08:12 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 37
Member No.: 662
Joined: September 04, 2005



QUOTE (Dénes @ May 19 2006, 07:48 PM)
P.S. It was I who sent to Martin Pegg the photo of Hs 129 B-2, No. 222b.

Why am i not suprised cool.gif
PMEmail Poster
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (2) 1 [2]  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.1279 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]