Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (2) 1 [2] ( Go to first unread post ) |
Dénes |
Posted: May 12, 2004 12:02 am
|
||||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
That's not entirely correct. The engine cowling was also different, to accomodate the new Jumo 211F engine. A visible difference was the air intake scope, moved from the port to the starboard side. |
||||
Dénes |
Posted: May 12, 2004 12:10 am
|
||||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
The main difference consisted of the weaker and heavier Jumo 211F engine, as well as the paddle-blade VS-11 propeller, both obviously negatively influencing the 'Mezek' (Mule)'s handling characteristics.
Yes, the Czechs built post-war 17 Avia S-99 and 2 CS-92 Turbína's from existing and newly manufactured Me 262 components. |
||||
Dénes |
Posted: May 12, 2004 12:16 am
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
Just by looking at the silhouette of the enclosed photo, one can see the (slight) differences, namely the cockpit canopy's shape, the main undercarriage cover, not to mention the inaccurate terra cotta camouflage colour. Despite these issues, the replica is not bad at all. It's nice to see a full-scale '80 under the blue sky... |
||
Carol I |
Posted: May 12, 2004 07:34 am
|
||||
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
I didn't see your previous post(s), but thanks for this answer. |
||||
bansaraba |
Posted: January 31, 2010 11:59 pm
|
Sergent Group: Members Posts: 184 Member No.: 2196 Joined: July 20, 2008 |
|
New Connaught Ranger |
Posted: February 10, 2010 05:15 pm
|
Colonel Group: Members Posts: 941 Member No.: 770 Joined: January 03, 2006 |
|
Pages: (2) 1 [2] |