Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (2) [1] 2 ( Go to first unread post ) |
Imperialist |
Posted: March 19, 2009 10:34 pm
|
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005 |
I noticed we talked about what helicopters, tanks and fighters Romania should buy.
What about anti-tank weapons systems? -------------------- I
|
Stephen Dabapuscu |
Posted: March 20, 2009 03:44 am
|
Sergent Group: Members Posts: 154 Member No.: 440 Joined: January 05, 2005 |
How about the Serbian Bumbar anti-tank guided missile?
|
tomcat1974 |
Posted: March 20, 2009 08:43 am
|
Plutonier Group: Members Posts: 263 Member No.: 427 Joined: December 20, 2004 |
Spike... Since we already have XL /L/M
|
MMM |
Posted: March 20, 2009 10:54 am
|
||
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 |
To make a really bad joke, the best anti-tank defense system would be to deepen the holes in our road system until they become anti-tank trenches... On a more serious note, I'm not sure what system do we have in use right now. -------------------- M
|
||
Imperialist |
Posted: March 20, 2009 11:56 am
|
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005 |
MMM, I've seen we're still using RPG-7s which probably make the bulk of our man-portable AT weapons.
In my opinion this would be an interesting acquisition that would enhance the possibilities of use in urban settings: MBT LAW has a soft launch and can be fired from confined spaces such as inside buildings and vehicle hatches. http://www.army-technology.com/projects/mbt_law/ -------------------- I
|
MMM |
Posted: March 20, 2009 12:27 pm
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 |
Right, but except portable weapons? Do we have anything or just old ATG's?
-------------------- M
|
Victor |
Posted: March 20, 2009 01:23 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
MMM, read tomcat's post.
In the future, pleasetry to leave out the jokes in serious topics. Thank you. |
Hadrian |
Posted: March 20, 2009 05:17 pm
|
Sergent major Group: Members Posts: 245 Member No.: 875 Joined: April 09, 2006 |
For the moment beeing, Ithink an upgrade of existing missiles would be sufficient.
http://tpb.traderom.ro/expozitii/domenii/P...aliutka_m2t.htm Eventually supplemented by a small number of Spikes, in the units that already use it on MLI-84. |
Imperialist |
Posted: March 20, 2009 06:07 pm
|
||||
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005 |
According to some sources, a penetration capability of 850 mm RHA seems rather low:
http://milparade.udm.ru/31/024.htm As for the RPG-7s, shouldn't/couldn't we build RPGs of types higher than 7? -------------------- I
|
||||
Hadrian |
Posted: March 22, 2009 03:36 pm
|
Sergent major Group: Members Posts: 245 Member No.: 875 Joined: April 09, 2006 |
The M2T has the warhead of the Milan 2T, which appeared in 1993, and has anti-ERA capabilities. It will punch a hole trough a T-72. Well, an Abbrams could be a different thing.
Of course another stronger warhead could/should be fitted, like Milan 3 or a newer one. For the RPG-7, why not adapt more poweful rockets based on RPG-29 technology? The launcher is just a tube, it will fire whatever you put in it. In Romania were already made thermobaric rockets, for example. This would be of coure an interim solution, destined to postpone major acquisition programs until funds are available. At the time we are in delay with the ongoing ones (multirole fighter, APC). Both upgrades could be selled also, for use on numerous existing russian platforms. Of course the best antitank weapons would be 48 multirole fighters armed with Brimstones, for example, and 24 attack helicopters (Tiger, Mangusta, SuperCobra?) to supplement the SOCAT (which is also an interim solution), armed with Spikes. This post has been edited by Hadrian on March 22, 2009 03:55 pm |
Iamandi |
Posted: January 30, 2010 09:38 am
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1386 Member No.: 319 Joined: August 04, 2004 |
How about ERYX?ERYX
|
contras |
Posted: January 30, 2010 12:23 pm
|
Maior Group: Members Posts: 732 Member No.: 2693 Joined: December 28, 2009 |
I think Javelin missile is an option.
|
C-2 |
Posted: January 30, 2010 12:28 pm
|
General Medic Group: Hosts Posts: 2453 Member No.: 19 Joined: June 23, 2003 |
What tank battle/tank invasion are we expecting?
What a/t sistem will rom. buy will have nothing to do with the real needs. Better spend the money on health. |
Iamandi |
Posted: January 30, 2010 02:36 pm
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1386 Member No.: 319 Joined: August 04, 2004 |
Why?
|
contras |
Posted: January 30, 2010 04:38 pm
|
Maior Group: Members Posts: 732 Member No.: 2693 Joined: December 28, 2009 |
If you want to live in peace, prepare yourself for war. (Chinese proverb)
|
Pages: (2) [1] 2 |