Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (2) [1] 2   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> What anti-tank system should Romania buy?
Imperialist
Posted: March 19, 2009 10:34 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



I noticed we talked about what helicopters, tanks and fighters Romania should buy.
What about anti-tank weapons systems?


--------------------
I
PM
Top
Stephen Dabapuscu
Posted: March 20, 2009 03:44 am
Quote Post


Sergent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Member No.: 440
Joined: January 05, 2005



How about the Serbian Bumbar anti-tank guided missile?
PMEmail Poster
Top
tomcat1974
Posted: March 20, 2009 08:43 am
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Members
Posts: 263
Member No.: 427
Joined: December 20, 2004



Spike... Since we already have XL /L/M
PMEmail Poster
Top
MMM
  Posted: March 20, 2009 10:54 am
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1463
Member No.: 2323
Joined: December 02, 2008



QUOTE
What about anti-tank weapons systems?

To make a really bad joke, the best anti-tank defense system would be to deepen the holes in our road system until they become anti-tank trenches...
On a more serious note, I'm not sure what system do we have in use right now.


--------------------
M
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Imperialist
Posted: March 20, 2009 11:56 am
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



MMM, I've seen we're still using RPG-7s which probably make the bulk of our man-portable AT weapons.

In my opinion this would be an interesting acquisition that would enhance the possibilities of use in urban settings:

MBT LAW has a soft launch and can be fired from confined spaces such as inside buildings and vehicle hatches.

http://www.army-technology.com/projects/mbt_law/


--------------------
I
PM
Top
MMM
Posted: March 20, 2009 12:27 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1463
Member No.: 2323
Joined: December 02, 2008



Right, but except portable weapons? Do we have anything or just old ATG's?


--------------------
M
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Victor
Posted: March 20, 2009 01:23 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



MMM, read tomcat's post.

In the future, pleasetry to leave out the jokes in serious topics. Thank you.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Hadrian
Posted: March 20, 2009 05:17 pm
Quote Post


Sergent major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 245
Member No.: 875
Joined: April 09, 2006



For the moment beeing, Ithink an upgrade of existing missiles would be sufficient.

http://tpb.traderom.ro/expozitii/domenii/P...aliutka_m2t.htm

Eventually supplemented by a small number of Spikes, in the units that already use it on MLI-84.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Imperialist
Posted: March 20, 2009 06:07 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



QUOTE (Hadrian @ March 20, 2009 05:17 pm)
For the moment beeing, Ithink an upgrade of existing missiles would be sufficient.

http://tpb.traderom.ro/expozitii/domenii/P...aliutka_m2t.htm

Eventually supplemented by a small number of Spikes, in the units that already use it on MLI-84.

According to some sources, a penetration capability of 850 mm RHA seems rather low:

QUOTE
The effective engagement of current and future tanks provided with explosive reactive armor is attained by a direct frontal impact of powerful tandem hollow-charge warheads with an armor penetration of 1,000 to 1,200 mm.


http://milparade.udm.ru/31/024.htm

As for the RPG-7s, shouldn't/couldn't we build RPGs of types higher than 7?





--------------------
I
PM
Top
Hadrian
Posted: March 22, 2009 03:36 pm
Quote Post


Sergent major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 245
Member No.: 875
Joined: April 09, 2006



The M2T has the warhead of the Milan 2T, which appeared in 1993, and has anti-ERA capabilities. It will punch a hole trough a T-72. Well, an Abbrams could be a different thing.
Of course another stronger warhead could/should be fitted, like Milan 3 or a newer one.

For the RPG-7, why not adapt more poweful rockets based on RPG-29 technology? The launcher is just a tube, it will fire whatever you put in it. In Romania were already made thermobaric rockets, for example.

This would be of coure an interim solution, destined to postpone major acquisition programs until funds are available. At the time we are in delay with the ongoing ones (multirole fighter, APC). Both upgrades could be selled also, for use on numerous existing russian platforms.

Of course the best antitank weapons would be 48 multirole fighters armed with Brimstones, for example, and 24 attack helicopters (Tiger, Mangusta, SuperCobra?) to supplement the SOCAT (which is also an interim solution), armed with Spikes.

This post has been edited by Hadrian on March 22, 2009 03:55 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
Iamandi
Posted: January 30, 2010 09:38 am
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004



How about ERYX?ERYX
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
contras
Posted: January 30, 2010 12:23 pm
Quote Post


Maior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 732
Member No.: 2693
Joined: December 28, 2009



I think Javelin missile is an option.
PMEmail Poster
Top
C-2
Posted: January 30, 2010 12:28 pm
Quote Post


General Medic
Group Icon

Group: Hosts
Posts: 2453
Member No.: 19
Joined: June 23, 2003



What tank battle/tank invasion are we expecting?
What a/t sistem will rom. buy will have nothing to do with the real needs.
Better spend the money on health.
PMUsers Website
Top
Iamandi
Posted: January 30, 2010 02:36 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004



Why? tongue.gif
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
contras
Posted: January 30, 2010 04:38 pm
Quote Post


Maior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 732
Member No.: 2693
Joined: December 28, 2009



If you want to live in peace, prepare yourself for war. (Chinese proverb)
PMEmail Poster
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (2) [1] 2  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0110 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]