Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (4) 1 2 [3] 4 ( Go to first unread post ) |
Claudiu1988 |
Posted: December 17, 2005 09:56 am
|
Colonel Group: Members Posts: 943 Member No.: 398 Joined: November 23, 2004 |
|
Claudiu1988 |
Posted: December 17, 2005 09:58 am
|
Colonel Group: Members Posts: 943 Member No.: 398 Joined: November 23, 2004 |
|
Dénes |
Posted: December 17, 2005 01:56 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
I am not big on A-H medals, but the ribbon of your item is completely different to the ribbon of the medal worn by the soldier in the studio photo.
Gen. Dénes |
Claudiu1988 |
Posted: December 17, 2005 02:50 pm
|
Colonel Group: Members Posts: 943 Member No.: 398 Joined: November 23, 2004 |
Yes I know but I sow a lot of A-H medals and orders that are the same but have different ribbons.
|
Dénes |
Posted: December 17, 2005 03:17 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
There were strict regulations as which order has to have what kind of ribbon. Therefore, of all variations, only one should be the correct one.
I will try to inquire about this particular medal. Gen. Dénes |
dragos03 |
Posted: December 17, 2005 03:24 pm
|
Capitan Group: Members Posts: 641 Member No.: 163 Joined: December 13, 2003 |
The one that the man in the photo is wearing is on the civilian ribbon.
The other (the one you bought) has a wrong ribbon (the ribbon of the Tirol medal). This post has been edited by dragos03 on December 17, 2005 03:25 pm |
dragos03 |
Posted: December 19, 2005 10:54 pm
|
Capitan Group: Members Posts: 641 Member No.: 163 Joined: December 13, 2003 |
|
Kepi |
Posted: December 20, 2005 06:14 am
|
Sublocotenent Group: Members Posts: 432 Member No.: 680 Joined: September 28, 2005 |
Only cavalry and artillery soldiers wore black trousers (breeches). Cavalrymen had high riding boots. So, the man in the photo might be an artillery private because he wears infantry puttees. The piping of his tunic should be black. The foot artillerymen carried M. 1890 artillery daggers (similar to the bayonet of the M. 1893 Mannlicher rifle). The artillery cap (“Capela”) – which is not fully visible - was decorated with two crossed gun barrels, made in black cloth, heaving above the number of the regiment. The colour of the puttees should be the same as the trousers, but during WW1 soldiers frequently wore different items of equipment and uniform.
|
dragos03 |
Posted: December 20, 2005 03:39 pm
|
Capitan Group: Members Posts: 641 Member No.: 163 Joined: December 13, 2003 |
Thank you Kepi.
|
Dénes |
Posted: January 03, 2006 02:47 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
I am wondering which Army branch was the soldier shown at left in?
Perhaps he wears a formal cavalry uniform. [from eBay] Gen. Dénes |
Claudiu1988 |
Posted: July 12, 2006 03:14 pm
|
Colonel Group: Members Posts: 943 Member No.: 398 Joined: November 23, 2004 |
|
Kepi |
Posted: July 12, 2006 05:19 pm
|
||
Sublocotenent Group: Members Posts: 432 Member No.: 680 Joined: September 28, 2005 |
It’s a Lieutenant of Engineers (Geniu) in full dress uniform (with fringed epaulettes): dark-blue tunic, black collar piped red with embroidered flamed grenade. The uniform is M.1895 pattern worn until 1912, but according the officer physiognomy it seems to be shot during the first decade of 20th Century. |
||
Claudiu1988 |
Posted: July 12, 2006 05:22 pm
|
Colonel Group: Members Posts: 943 Member No.: 398 Joined: November 23, 2004 |
Kepi thanks for the information.
|
b737 |
Posted: July 17, 2006 01:15 pm
|
Plutonier major Group: Members Posts: 311 Member No.: 390 Joined: November 18, 2004 |
|
Claudiu1988 |
Posted: February 03, 2007 04:08 pm
|
Colonel Group: Members Posts: 943 Member No.: 398 Joined: November 23, 2004 |
|
Pages: (4) 1 2 [3] 4 |