Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
scorpio |
Posted: May 15, 2010 01:45 pm
|
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 54 Member No.: 762 Joined: December 24, 2005 |
|
C-2 |
Posted: May 15, 2010 05:09 pm
|
General Medic Group: Hosts Posts: 2453 Member No.: 19 Joined: June 23, 2003 |
VEry nice!
The scale? This post has been edited by C-2 on May 15, 2010 05:10 pm |
scorpio |
Posted: May 15, 2010 06:13 pm
|
||
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 54 Member No.: 762 Joined: December 24, 2005 |
In 1/32 scale. |
||
Alexei2102 |
Posted: May 15, 2010 06:22 pm
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1352 Member No.: 888 Joined: April 24, 2006 |
Wonderful piece, congratulations.
Stuka is one of my favorite planes. Al |
d1ragos |
Posted: June 01, 2010 04:18 pm
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 44 Member No.: 2241 Joined: September 03, 2008 |
great job !
|
Alexei2102 |
Posted: June 02, 2010 10:04 am
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1352 Member No.: 888 Joined: April 24, 2006 |
Yes, indeed, a great job, and I really like this plane, it has a personality of its own.
Al |
d1ragos |
Posted: June 04, 2010 04:33 pm
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 44 Member No.: 2241 Joined: September 03, 2008 |
That is right , it is unique .
I'm fascinated about that plane , I remember that I've read an article about Stuka on "Magazin Istroic" when I was a kid , if I'm not mistaken the title was "Stuka -Rechinul vazduhului" , sory , I don't remember the year .... but there was also some pictures . |
Radub |
Posted: June 05, 2010 09:49 am
|
General de corp de armata Group: Members Posts: 1670 Member No.: 476 Joined: January 23, 2005 |
Very nice. One small observation though: there is an extremely good possibility that this aircraft wore small Romanian crosses on the undersurfaces, behind the air brakes. Most of the photos of the undersides of the aircraft of the same unit, painted and decorated in a similar manner, featured that marking.
Radu |
Dénes |
Posted: June 06, 2010 06:24 am
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
I agree with Radu's comment (valid only for the under surfaces).
Gen. Dénes This post has been edited by Dénes on June 06, 2010 06:25 am |
scorpio |
Posted: June 06, 2010 08:34 am
|
||
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 54 Member No.: 762 Joined: December 24, 2005 |
|
||
Radub |
Posted: June 06, 2010 03:36 pm
|
General de corp de armata Group: Members Posts: 1670 Member No.: 476 Joined: January 23, 2005 |
Aha! Good!
Apologies, I just could not see it in the photos. Radu |
Ursulescu |
Posted: July 31, 2010 07:51 pm
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 128 Member No.: 2729 Joined: February 08, 2010 |
Looks excellent! I have a balsawood flying model of this plane that i still have to build.
One question though - wouldn't the plane also have the KMC on the upper wing tips? And if not...then why wouldn't they put it there? (historically speaking) |
Radub |
Posted: August 01, 2010 08:40 am
|
||
General de corp de armata Group: Members Posts: 1670 Member No.: 476 Joined: January 23, 2005 |
All existing photos indicate that the cross was not applied to the upper surfaces of the wings of the Ju87 of Gr.3 Picaj. The only exception seems to be a Ju87 marked "861" but the markings and insignia applied to that particular plane are extremely unusual and not repeated on any other known aircraft. HTH Radu |
||
Ursulescu |
Posted: August 03, 2010 05:14 pm
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 128 Member No.: 2729 Joined: February 08, 2010 |
Interesting. I'll have to remeber that when I build my Balsa wood flying model.
|