Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (28) « First ... 26 27 [28] ( Go to first unread post ) |
21 inf |
Posted: January 23, 2013 01:55 pm
|
General de corp de armata Group: Retired Posts: 1512 Member No.: 1232 Joined: January 05, 2007 |
As far as I remember (I might be wrong) the Hungarian offensive from Baia Mare was the first which was initiated. The 2nd Romanian Border Regiment was reacting to the Hungarian offensive. The Romanian militia raised by this regent was not the same as the Romanian Landsturm. First, it was subordinated to the regiment, not the RNC from
sibiu as the landsturm and second, the fighters were former soldiers, invalids or semiinvalides of the regiment. |
ANDREAS |
Posted: January 24, 2013 10:56 pm
|
||
Locotenent colonel Group: Members Posts: 814 Member No.: 2421 Joined: March 15, 2009 |
What I was talking about and what do you answer? I was talking about Kossuth because you gave him as an example of goodwill and understanding to the rebelled population, and you answer that the Romanian militia was led by Romanian-born officers of the Austrian Army so it was natural that Hungarian army intervene... as usually you avoid the answers that you don't like! At the same time is absurd to believe that an officer (even with the help of dozens of soldiers -I just said so, in this exemple is not the case!) could raise whole villages, if the population was satisfied about her status! On the other hand to overlook the fact that in front of an uprising they (hungarian troops) burn houses and kill civilians don't make them anything better than the Austrian Army at Resita that you blamed! |
||
Pages: (28) « First ... 26 27 [28] |