Interesting article |  |  |
| Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines |
 Help
 Search
 Members
 Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
   |
Interesting article| redcooper |
Posted: July 03, 2007 07:25 am
|
 Soldat  Group: Members Posts: 30 Member No.: 1329 Joined: March 01, 2007  |
|
 
|
| Imperialist |
Posted: July 03, 2007 08:48 am
|
 General de armata  Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005 |
An Army of 75,000 while the bulk of investments are directed to the Navy. Weird.
-------------------- I
|
|
|
| mateias |
Posted: December 14, 2007 04:12 pm
|
|
Sergent  Group: Members Posts: 169 Member No.: 1704 Joined: December 02, 2007 |
Navy means fat commissions given for scrap iron.
Same for planes. |
|
|
| guina |
Posted: December 14, 2007 06:40 pm
|
|
Plutonier major  Group: Members Posts: 339 Member No.: 1393 Joined: April 16, 2007 |
There is nothing new in this article.Its simply a matter of political decision and for them the cominng elections are infinitely more important then the defence of the country.
Why the Navy,thats another question that can be debated.BTW,16 milions for " Definul " is peanuts.Russia has only one operational sub in the Black Sea and it was launched 5 years earlier then " Delfinul ".The same " Kilo ' class.The rest of their "Cernamorski Flot ' is even older then ours ( more then 30 years on average ) and not that big. |
|
|
| cainele_franctiror |
Posted: August 08, 2008 06:49 pm
|
 Sublocotenent  Group: Members Posts: 449 Member No.: 334 Joined: September 01, 2004 |
I tried, but I could not find the NATO Report. Do you have it? Or an internet adress?
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
 |
|
[ Script Execution time: 0.0441 ] [ 14 queries used ] [ GZIP Enabled ]
Powered by Invision Power Board(U) v1.3.1 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.