Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Which proved more effective: Hs129/Ju87 or PIV/StugIII?
 
Which proved more effective in Romanian service: Hs129/Ju87 or PIV/StugIII?
Hs129/Ju87 [ 5 ]  [125.00%]
PIV/StugIII [ 2 ]  [50.00%]
Total Votes: 7
Guests cannot vote 
Huck
Posted on May 07, 2004 12:15 am
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Member No.: 41
Joined: July 11, 2003



I was wondering which proved more effective with Romanian forces: the assault aviation or the medium armor? I know it's a little bit (or more) of apple/oranges comparison but still.. say we take as a criteria the number of armor / artillery pieces and vehicles destroyed. Who got better scores: the aprox 400 Hs-129 and Ju-87 (and some Ju-88 used in attack missions) or the 200+ PIV and StugIII?

I am always amazed when I look at the scores that German assault aviations got. Top scorers are much better than their ground based counterparts. Take a look at this list:

http://www.luftwaffe.cz/tank.html

I know that pilots have a tendency to overclaim due to objective reasons (impossibility to check the claim during the mission). Nevertheless the numbers are impressive. Aces alone claimed 4369 tanks (other vehicles are not included in this total) and this was done with a very small force, usually not in excess of 1000 planes. Soviets apparently understood better the importance of attack aviation, producing Il-2 in numbers comparable with their tanks (Il-2 is probably the plane with the largest production numbers of all times).

For me it's hard to understand why Axis countries, that lacked the amounts of steel needed to make an effective armor force (against soviets, that is) did not try to make a larger assault aviation (which apparently was very effective). Possible reasons might be the lack of fuel and qualified pilots, but none were serious before spring of '44.

But let's return to the original question: how effective was Romanian assault aviation? I know that we have really knowledgeable people here in this subject (like Denes who wrote a book about Hs-129). I'm anxious to learn your opinion.
PM
Top
Dénes
Posted on May 07, 2004 12:43 am
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



There are no reliable hard figures available, so any result would be only speculative. Therefore I am not casting a vote.

BTW, you did not include among the choices the AT cannon, which also accounted for a considerable number of AFV 'kills'.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
C-2
Posted on May 10, 2004 01:17 pm
Quote Post


General Medic
Group Icon

Group: Hosts
Posts: 2453
Member No.: 19
Joined: June 23, 2003



Dif.aircrafts on dif.jobs...
Cannot vote....
PMUsers Website
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0094 ]   [ 17 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]