Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (2) [1] 2 ( Go to first unread post ) |
petru |
Posted: March 09, 2004 08:14 pm
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 117 Member No.: 149 Joined: November 27, 2003 |
Does anyone know the organization of an infantry division during WWI.
|
dead-cat |
Posted: March 10, 2004 07:50 am
|
Locotenent Group: Members Posts: 559 Member No.: 99 Joined: September 05, 2003 |
a typical german ww1 infantry division in spring 1918, when the firepower of a division approached early ww2 levels:
HQ (12.300 men, 48 guns) Brigade HQ 3 Infantry Regiments with each 3 Infantry Battalions with each: 3 Infantry Companies 3 Platoons of 3-4 squads each, 2 Bergmann light machine-guns 1 Machine-gun Company 3 Platoons with 4 Machine-guns each. 1 Trench mortar Company: 3 medium and 3 light Minenwerfers 1 Signals Platoon 1 Cavalry Squadron: with 2 Machine-guns Artillery Regiment 3 Artillery Battalions3 Batteries of 4 FK-16/FK-96nA 77mm guns each 1 Machine-gun battery of 6 guns Howitzer Battalion 3 Batteries of 4 100mm howitzers, 2 MGs per battery Pioneer Battalion 2 Pioneer companies Signals Detachment Transport & Munitions column Hospital detachment: 1 clearing & 2 field hospitals somtimes the division would have about 15800 men, 48 guns, 120 mortars, 38(?) MG08 and 144 LMG i think the heavy artillery regiments (150mm upward) were attached to the division as needed. not sure though. also not sure to whom the superheavy artillery (stationary and railroad artillery) belonged. |
Victor |
Posted: March 10, 2004 04:29 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
I think he was referring to the Romanian division.
After the reorganization during the winter of 1916, the Romanian infantry division had the following order of battle: -2 infantry brigades (1 brigade: 2 infantry regiments; 1 regiment: 4 battalions) -1 artillery brigade (1 regiment with 9 gun batteries and 1 regiment with 4 howitzer batteries) -1 pioneer battalion -1 cavalry battalion (2 cavalry squadrons) -services *the divisions 1 to 10 also had one vanatori regiment each (2 battalions). |
petru |
Posted: March 10, 2004 07:29 pm
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 117 Member No.: 149 Joined: November 27, 2003 |
Thanks, I was referring to the Romanian division.
|
Carol I |
Posted: March 14, 2004 09:37 am
|
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
I have found the following organisation of the Romanian army on the outbreak of WWI:
Five army corps, each composed of two active divisions and one in reserve. Each division had two brigades (composed of two regiments of three battalions). Each army corps had attached to it a cavalry (calarasi) brigade, a howitzer regiment, a pioneers' battalion and supplementary services. There was also a cavalry corps consisting of two divisions (six brigades, twelve regiments) of rosiori and five brigades of calarasi. |
Dan Po |
Posted: May 11, 2004 09:45 am
|
||
Sergent major Group: Members Posts: 208 Member No.: 226 Joined: February 23, 2004 |
Each infantry division had also 1 artilery brigade composed of 1 regiment of guns and 1 regiment of howitzers, 1 or 2 calarasi (cavalery) squadrons, 1 pioneers batallion and service formations .... divisions 1 - 10 had 1 vanatori (hunters) regiment with 2 battalions as elite unit. In conclusion a romanian infantry division in 1917 had 14 battalions (for 1st to 10th inf. div - with 2 extra ''vanatori" batallions) or 12 batallions ( 11th to 15 th inf divisions without vanatori battalions). In the same a german division had 9 battalions, a russian one 12 - 16, austro-hungarian 12, bulgarian 16, turkish 9 battalions. |
||
Victor |
Posted: May 11, 2004 10:20 am
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
Dan, look 3 posts above your's :wink:
|
Carol I |
Posted: May 11, 2004 10:34 am
|
||||
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
What period you are referring to? Your organisation looks very much like the one described by Victor for the period after the restructuring performed in the winter of 1916. The description I gave, on the other hand, is said to have existed on the outbreak of WWI. |
||||
Dan Po |
Posted: May 11, 2004 10:58 am
|
||
Sergent major Group: Members Posts: 208 Member No.: 226 Joined: February 23, 2004 |
Sorry Carol I :oops: i was consider the restructuring of romanian army from 1916 - 1917 winter. I didn t think at the key "outbreak" .... |
||
Carol I |
Posted: May 11, 2004 11:10 am
|
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
No problem about the misunderstanding.
In fact the comparison shows very clearly how the strength of a division was increased after the 1916 restructuring: from one artillery regiment for three divisions (one army corps) at the outbreak of WWI to two artillery regiments (one brigade) per division in the winter of 1916. |
Dan Po |
Posted: May 11, 2004 11:31 am
|
Sergent major Group: Members Posts: 208 Member No.: 226 Joined: February 23, 2004 |
Also we have to consider the improvemets made in infantry fire power ... from around 500 MG to 4000 at the end of WW1 and from 0 LMGs to a few thousands. Also the training of troops was very much improoved too - in fact romanian army started to be considered as the ''french army from the eastern front".
This post has been edited by Dan Po on October 31, 2004 09:30 pm |
petru |
Posted: May 11, 2004 08:31 pm
|
||||
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 117 Member No.: 149 Joined: November 27, 2003 |
Didn’t help us too much. Marasesti is not even mentioned in some books about WWI. The focus of the campaign in the east is on the dissolution of the Russian army (as it should be), but apparently Romanian ceased to exist in 1917.
What do you mean by LMG? I found no distinction for HMG and LMG in WWI. I found some references for the SMG (a number of 96 per regiment or division). |
||||
petru |
Posted: May 11, 2004 08:34 pm
|
||
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 117 Member No.: 149 Joined: November 27, 2003 |
Never mind my previous post. |
||
Dan Po |
Posted: May 14, 2004 06:13 am
|
||
Sergent major Group: Members Posts: 208 Member No.: 226 Joined: February 23, 2004 |
SMG s in romanian army during the WW! ? let me be more than surprised .... :!: :!: :!: I know that the first SMG was introduced in service (experimentaly) in italian army, in WW1 ... but i didn t heared about this kind of weapons in romanian army ... Wait ... SMG (sub-machine-gun) is equivalent with rom. pistol-mitraliera right ? If its so, 96 SMG per regiment its something too much even for romanian army in early times of WW2 ... |
||
Victor |
Posted: May 14, 2004 06:38 am
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
petru made a confusion between pusca mitraliera (LMG) and pistol mitraliera (SMG). There were obviously LMGs.
|
Pages: (2) [1] 2 |