Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Victor |
Posted: October 02, 2004 07:20 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
I am interested to know what VVS-CHF unit carried out a bombing raid on Sulina harbor on 28 June 1941 and damaged the NMS Aurora mine-laying ship.
|
dragos |
Posted: October 02, 2004 08:44 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 2397 Member No.: 2 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
I don't know if it helps, but the only Soviet air unit assigned to the Soviet Danube flotilla in 1941, was the 96th fighter squadron.
|
Dénes |
Posted: October 02, 2004 10:35 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
I doubt that the 96th Fighter Squadron, actually the 96th Otdelnaya Aviaeskadrilya (OAE - independent squadron), was responsible for the mentioned bombing attack, as it was equipped only with Polikarpov I-153s and older I-15s.
Most probably the attackers have to be looked for among the bomber units of the VVS-ChF, as Victor noted. Gen. Dénes |
dragos |
Posted: October 03, 2004 12:52 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 2397 Member No.: 2 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
Then maybe they are to be found among the VVS bomber units that also attacked Constanta during June 1941: 2nd, 40th and 63rd Regiments.
|
Ruy Aballe |
Posted: October 03, 2004 01:47 pm
|
Plutonier major Group: Members Posts: 307 Member No.: 247 Joined: March 18, 2004 |
The 40th was one of the Long Range Bomber (DBA) regiments. The unit had DB-3 and DB-3F twin-engined bombers in its inventory.
|
Th. Dorgeist |
Posted: October 06, 2004 07:30 am
|
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 64 Member No.: 31 Joined: July 09, 2003 |
Hallo zusammen,
ich habe für diesen Zeitraum folgende Daten und würde mich freuen zu den Eintragungen etwas zu erfahren. 28.06.41 rum. oder dt. Prahm mit 15 cm Kanonen +++ russ. Flibo, Sulina rum. oder dt. Materialprahm +++ russ. Flibo, Sulina rum Schlepper MANTURIREA +++ russ. Flibo, Sulina rum Schlepper AURORA auf Strand gesetzt russ. Flibo, Sulina 16.07.41 rum Minenlegboot AURORA +++ russ. Luftangriff ,Domnita-Maria 16.07.41 rum Schlepper DANIEL +++ russ. Luftangriff ,Domnita-Maria 17?07.41 bul. Minenräumboot ..... +++ Feuer, Hafen Varna 07.41 russ.Boot 134 erbeutet 11.11.41 Der auf der Donau versenkte rum Eisbrecher MANTURIREA (Flibo) soll noch im Nov. gehoben werden. 14.11.41 Schl. Vartossa und SF 10 bei Gibrieni Bucht an Land getrieben (Bergung?) Dank und Gruß Theo |
Victor |
Posted: October 06, 2004 04:31 pm
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
Not according to Black Cross/Red Star vol. I, where it is mentioned as part of VVS-ChF It apparentky started the war with SBs and later in 1941 received Pe-2s. Dragos, what you mentioned are the 2 MTAP, 40 BAP and 63 BAB (I think) |
||
dragos |
Posted: October 06, 2004 04:50 pm
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 2397 Member No.: 2 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
Well, I don't know what BAP or BAB means... |
||
Ruy Aballe |
Posted: October 06, 2004 05:45 pm
|
Plutonier major Group: Members Posts: 307 Member No.: 247 Joined: March 18, 2004 |
Victor,
I must check my references then, but as far as I know the Pe-2 was not a common sight in Long Range Bomber regiments in 1941. The Black Cross/Red Star Vol. 1 book is quite a good source anyway, but I will take a peer at some others too. Ruy |
Miroslav Morozov |
Posted: January 02, 2005 11:37 pm
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 37 Member No.: 141 Joined: November 15, 2003 |
Hello, friends!
There were SBs from 40th BAP of VVS CHf. BTW, 63rd regiment never existed in VVS CHf. This misordered with 63rd air brigade which included both 2nd MTAP and 40th BAP. Regards, Miroslav |
Victor |
Posted: January 03, 2005 07:41 am
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
Thanks Miroslav for the confirmation. I presumed they belonged to the 40 BAP. I will modify the article on the Aurora.
|
Mirek Wawrzynski |
Posted: July 29, 2006 03:56 pm
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 5 Member No.: 51 Joined: July 22, 2003 |
Hi
There are some mass about VVS BF bomber unit, which could be used against Romanian targets (Sulina, Constanca or other targets). The VVS Black Fleet had 63. BAB (Bomber Air Brigade), which had 2 flying regiments: 2. MTAP (on fresh new DB-3F, later it was called Il-4 and on the begining of June 41 the 2. MTAP 71 and 54 servisable). The next unit was 40. BAP (mostly on SB but on the first and third day of war to the 63. BAB had come 5 day each next bombers - Pe-2. They were attached to the 40 BAP - on separate flight/squadron, these planes were not send on air attack in the first week of war - crews were not yet trained). To the 2 bomber regiment you have to add 2 separete bomber squadrons (70., 78. OBAE VVS BF) these separate bomber flight had 12 and 13 SB bombers each. 70 OBAE had airfiled near Odessa for example and had enough range to easly attack Sulina harbor as other bomber unit could the same taking off from Crime bases. And at last there was also 3. SURAP (training regiment), which also send some crew for attack on Rumanian targets (like Constanca) - on the first day of war. SB bomber was not any long-range bomber, only DB-3, DB-3F could be so called and were treated as a long-range bombers. 2 MTAP had the version adopted for martime duties (torpedo and mine carriers as coul carry normal bombs). Against Sulina could be used such bomber power of VVS BF (remeber that land aviation had also some bomber unit including longe- rage 4. DBAK). On 22 VI 1941 the VVS BF bomber power had 136 servicable bombers (61 DB-3F + 75 SB). See more data and stories on my material Hurricane over Constanca and Odessa. Esc. 53 van in comabt 1941. All text is only in Polish. Regards Mirek Wawrzynski So I think that against Sulina could be used 70. OBAE or 78. OBAE, or 40. BAP. The mines were put by 2. MTAP which had ple adopted for this pourpes. PS I do not trust much the value of The Black Cross and Red Stars vol. 1 (too many errors and faults I have had discovered there about this or other topics). Not recomended. |
yugit |
Posted: August 30, 2011 12:01 am
|
Sergent major Group: Banned Posts: 216 Member No.: 3058 Joined: May 07, 2011 |
Mr Morozov
According to my data bases on BBC and BMF in 1941 on which I've worked for years in addition while also reviewing your both books Torpedos and BMF CHf Aviation 1941, on June 28,41....the 40th Sqduadron was not active at Sulina. However the VVS 22nd Grp Long Range bombers which flew also recon missions over Sulina may have caused the mentioned loss of the Rumanian Navy. The 22nd long range bombers of VVS took off from the naval air base at Saki. Also the 67 IAP from Bolgrad along with 78 AE from Izmail were through the area, though I doubt they had something to do with it.Irronically the 67 IAP lost on that day 2 planes SE of Vulcanesti Lately I have completed my data base on all BMF and VVS losses in Rumania between 1943 and Sept 29, 1944. Best Regards This post has been edited by yugit on August 30, 2011 12:14 am |
yugit |
Posted: September 08, 2011 01:32 pm
|
Sergent major Group: Banned Posts: 216 Member No.: 3058 Joined: May 07, 2011 |
Hi
Just a feedback to your post which I saw only now, additionally I am new on here and I couldnt reply in time. Your details containing critical errors. 1. It was called 3 URAP and not 3 SURAP , and unlike you mentioned they operated SB's on long range from Djankoe, they were all experienced pilots instructors and they were 1st to fall at Constanza and Tulcea....Agarici scored 2 3 URAP bombers. 2. 78 AE were based near Rumanian border at Izmail and later at transf.in rush to Nikolaev they were not operated from Odessa but arrived at Odessa on June 26,41 for attacking various Rumanian targets and returned to Nikolaev 3. The 40 AP(BAP ) of the CHf operated DB-3T, DB-3F, PE-2 and even SB's This post has been edited by yugit on September 08, 2011 07:32 pm |