Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Romanian Air-Force Generals' Ranks
Mareşal Boboescu
Posted: November 21, 2004 06:55 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Member No.: 397
Joined: November 21, 2004



The today Generals' Ranks for the Air-Force seem a bit odd to me. We have
General de Flotila Aeriana (OK)
General Maior (in stead of de Escadra sau Divizie Aeriana)
General Locotenent (in stead of Comandor)
General Inspector (OK)
If Gen. Locotenet is slitelly acceptable, Gen. Maior is unacceptable. The rank is Lt-cmdr. for God's sake.

HONOR ET PATRIA
Ml. B.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Dénes
Posted: November 21, 2004 07:42 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



Below are the W.W.2-era ARR Generals' ranks:
ARR Ranks ......... Translation ......... USAAF Ranks

General de escadrã av. General of Air Squad Av. Major General
General comandant av. General Commander Av. Lieutenant General
General inspector av. General Inspector Av. General

Col. Dénes

This post has been edited by Dénes on November 21, 2004 07:43 pm
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Mareşal Boboescu
Posted: November 21, 2004 08:01 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Member No.: 397
Joined: November 21, 2004



QUOTE (Dénes @ Nov 21 2004, 07:42 PM)
Below are the W.W.2-era ARR Generals' ranks:
ARR Ranks ......... Translation ......... USAAF Ranks

General de escadrã av. General of Air Squad Av. Major General
General comandant av. General Commander Av. Lieutenant General
General inspector av. General Inspector Av. General

Col. Dénes

I understand.
What I mean is that the rank of Gen. Mr. has no meaning since the rank of major has the equivalent of Lt. Cmdr.

HONOR ET PATRIA
Ml. B.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Victor
Posted: November 21, 2004 09:39 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



QUOTE (Mareşal Boboescu @ Nov 21 2004, 08:55 PM)
If Gen. Locotenet is slitelly acceptable, Gen. Maior is unacceptable. The rank is Lt-cmdr. for God's sake.

blink.gif What exactly are you trying to say?
The ranks of major general and lieutenant general have been used by Western army for decades. What's the problem?
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Mareşal Boboescu
Posted: November 22, 2004 07:44 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Member No.: 397
Joined: November 21, 2004



QUOTE (Victor @ Nov 21 2004, 09:39 PM)
QUOTE (Mareşal Boboescu @ Nov 21 2004, 08:55 PM)
If Gen. Locotenet is slitelly acceptable, Gen. Maior is unacceptable. The rank is Lt-cmdr. for God's sake.

blink.gif What exactly are you trying to say?
The ranks of major general and lieutenant general have been used by Western army for decades. What's the problem?

The problem is that the Romanian Air-Force has a special type general ranks like the R.A.F. for example. A mixture of those ranks and the Western ranks seems a bit odd if not laughable. And as I said the equvalent of Maior in the Air-Force is Locotenent-Comandor, so does not it seem a bit odd to have the rank of Gen-maior when the rank of Maior has an equivalent accepted ??!! This is my point. I hope it is understood.

HONOR ET PATRIA

Ml. B.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Victor
Posted: November 22, 2004 08:06 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



The idea was to have the ranks that most of the NATO countries use after the US model. That is why the "general de armata", "general de corp de armata" and "general de divizie" were renounsed (unfortunately) and teh major general, lt. general and general were adopted instead.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Mareşal Boboescu
Posted: November 23, 2004 07:24 am
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Member No.: 397
Joined: November 21, 2004



QUOTE (Victor @ Nov 22 2004, 08:06 PM)
The idea was to have the ranks that most of the NATO countries use after the US model. That is why the "general de armata", "general de corp de armata" and "general de divizie" were renounsed (unfortunately) and teh major general, lt. general and general were adopted instead.

Ok.
But the French have been in NATO for some time now and they still hold the ranks that good-old Petain said that they will never change (if the discution must lead to this, But I think were breacking away from the main subject).

HONOR ET PATRIA

Ml. B.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Iamandi
Posted: November 23, 2004 10:53 am
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004



QUOTE (Mareşal Boboescu @ Nov 23 2004, 07:24 AM)
Ok.
But the French have been in NATO for some time now and they still hold the ranks that good-old Petain said that they will never change (if the discution must lead to this, But I think were breacking away from the main subject).

HONOR ET PATRIA

Ml. B.


Hm! France is not a good example in NATO membership. In some ways, France is a "rebel" country/black sheep, etc. France had power to make what she wants. We, in oposit point of view, have a "kiss-ass" action, and who knows when we stop doing that. "Hey, americans, you see? We are dressed like you, we drink our type of juices, we smoke your type of cigars, we .... - Our generals have a good rankink models of yours, of course with a different salary..."

Like "summer is not like winter", Romania is not like France.

Iama
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0072 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]