Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Mareşal Boboescu |
Posted: November 21, 2004 06:55 pm
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 31 Member No.: 397 Joined: November 21, 2004 |
The today Generals' Ranks for the Air-Force seem a bit odd to me. We have
General de Flotila Aeriana (OK) General Maior (in stead of de Escadra sau Divizie Aeriana) General Locotenent (in stead of Comandor) General Inspector (OK) If Gen. Locotenet is slitelly acceptable, Gen. Maior is unacceptable. The rank is Lt-cmdr. for God's sake. HONOR ET PATRIA Ml. B. |
Dénes |
Posted: November 21, 2004 07:42 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
Below are the W.W.2-era ARR Generals' ranks:
ARR Ranks ......... Translation ......... USAAF Ranks General de escadrã av. General of Air Squad Av. Major General General comandant av. General Commander Av. Lieutenant General General inspector av. General Inspector Av. General Col. Dénes This post has been edited by Dénes on November 21, 2004 07:43 pm |
Mareşal Boboescu |
Posted: November 21, 2004 08:01 pm
|
||
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 31 Member No.: 397 Joined: November 21, 2004 |
I understand. What I mean is that the rank of Gen. Mr. has no meaning since the rank of major has the equivalent of Lt. Cmdr. HONOR ET PATRIA Ml. B. |
||
Victor |
Posted: November 21, 2004 09:39 pm
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
What exactly are you trying to say? The ranks of major general and lieutenant general have been used by Western army for decades. What's the problem? |
||
Mareşal Boboescu |
Posted: November 22, 2004 07:44 pm
|
||||
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 31 Member No.: 397 Joined: November 21, 2004 |
The problem is that the Romanian Air-Force has a special type general ranks like the R.A.F. for example. A mixture of those ranks and the Western ranks seems a bit odd if not laughable. And as I said the equvalent of Maior in the Air-Force is Locotenent-Comandor, so does not it seem a bit odd to have the rank of Gen-maior when the rank of Maior has an equivalent accepted ??!! This is my point. I hope it is understood. HONOR ET PATRIA Ml. B. |
||||
Victor |
Posted: November 22, 2004 08:06 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
The idea was to have the ranks that most of the NATO countries use after the US model. That is why the "general de armata", "general de corp de armata" and "general de divizie" were renounsed (unfortunately) and teh major general, lt. general and general were adopted instead.
|
Mareşal Boboescu |
Posted: November 23, 2004 07:24 am
|
||
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 31 Member No.: 397 Joined: November 21, 2004 |
Ok. But the French have been in NATO for some time now and they still hold the ranks that good-old Petain said that they will never change (if the discution must lead to this, But I think were breacking away from the main subject). HONOR ET PATRIA Ml. B. |
||
Iamandi |
Posted: November 23, 2004 10:53 am
|
||
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1386 Member No.: 319 Joined: August 04, 2004 |
Hm! France is not a good example in NATO membership. In some ways, France is a "rebel" country/black sheep, etc. France had power to make what she wants. We, in oposit point of view, have a "kiss-ass" action, and who knows when we stop doing that. "Hey, americans, you see? We are dressed like you, we drink our type of juices, we smoke your type of cigars, we .... - Our generals have a good rankink models of yours, of course with a different salary..." Like "summer is not like winter", Romania is not like France. Iama |
||