Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (3) 1 [2] 3   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Royal Daggers
aviatiadasenzatia
Posted: January 02, 2006 11:08 am
Quote Post


Sergent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 177
Member No.: 391
Joined: November 18, 2004



QUOTE (REGAL UNIFORMA COLECTOR @ Nov 26 2005, 04:14 PM)
It looks like the blade broke and was then filed down.

The blade wasn't broke and is not Mini Air Force dagger . This dagger is a marine cadet dagger . I have a similar one. This is the normal way how they looked.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Carol I
Posted: January 02, 2006 02:03 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2250
Member No.: 136
Joined: November 06, 2003



QUOTE (aviatiadasenzatia @ Jan 2 2006, 12:08 PM)
QUOTE (REGAL UNIFORMA COLECTOR @ Nov 26 2005, 04:14 PM)
It looks like the blade broke and was then filed down.

The blade wasn't broke and is not Mini Air Force dagger . This dagger is a marine cadet dagger . I have a similar one. This is the normal way how they looked.

May we see your dagger?
PM
Top
aviatiadasenzatia
Posted: January 02, 2006 02:18 pm
Quote Post


Sergent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 177
Member No.: 391
Joined: November 18, 2004



Sure , here it is. I wanted to do another picture with this dagger and a regular navy dagger. I'll do that some other time.

user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
Carol I
Posted: January 02, 2006 02:22 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2250
Member No.: 136
Joined: November 06, 2003



QUOTE (aviatiadasenzatia @ Jan 2 2006, 03:18 PM)
Sure , here it is.

Thanks.
PM
Top
aviatiadasenzatia
Posted: January 02, 2006 03:46 pm
Quote Post


Sergent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 177
Member No.: 391
Joined: November 18, 2004



Here are the regular ones and the cadet.
user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
Carol I
Posted: January 02, 2006 03:55 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2250
Member No.: 136
Joined: November 06, 2003



I think there still is some difference between the two daggers. The one from eBay appears to be "pointier" than the one in your collection. Also, the relative length of the blades compared to the handles seems to be different.

user posted image

user posted image
PM
Top
REGAL UNIFORMA COLECTOR
Posted: May 29, 2006 01:39 am
Quote Post


General de brigada
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1079
Member No.: 198
Joined: January 18, 2004



user posted image

WW1 Naval Dagger.
PMYahooMSN
Top
REGAL UNIFORMA COLECTOR
Posted: May 29, 2006 01:41 am
Quote Post


General de brigada
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1079
Member No.: 198
Joined: January 18, 2004



user posted image

Another example WW1 Naval Dagger.
PMYahooMSN
Top
REGAL UNIFORMA COLECTOR
Posted: May 29, 2006 01:43 am
Quote Post


General de brigada
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1079
Member No.: 198
Joined: January 18, 2004



user posted image

Another example WW1 Naval dagger with black handle.
PMYahooMSN
Top
REGAL UNIFORMA COLECTOR
Posted: May 29, 2006 01:44 am
Quote Post


General de brigada
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1079
Member No.: 198
Joined: January 18, 2004



user posted image

Another example WW1 Naval dagger with painted white handle.
PMYahooMSN
Top
Wings_of_wrath
Posted: May 29, 2006 05:41 am
Quote Post


Caporal
*

Group: Members
Posts: 136
Member No.: 809
Joined: February 04, 2006



QUOTE (Carol I @ Jan 2 2006, 03:55 PM)
I think there still is some difference between the two daggers. The one from eBay appears to be "pointier" than the one in your collection. Also, the relative length of the blades compared to the handles seems to be different.

user posted image

user posted image

Although I know nothing about WW2 ceremonial daggers, this sure looks to my untrained eyes like a re-sharpened Naval Cadet dagger...
I did see similar cases with all sorts of bladed weapons, especially concerning "refinished" bayonets passed off as genuine in shops around Bucharest.
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Kepi
Posted: May 29, 2006 06:13 am
Quote Post


Sublocotenent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 432
Member No.: 680
Joined: September 28, 2005



There were not daggers in the Romanian Navy during WW1, at least not officially.
The first Navy daggers were adopted by the Royal Decree Nr. 2008 of 12th of May 1921. According this document, the Navy officers daggers should have the grip made in ivory, of elliptical shape, with the pommel of a crown shape. The cross guard had a rectangular central body decorated with an inclined anchor, and had two extreme round quillons. The blade was straight double edged, and the scabbard was made in brass and had two loose-rings.
These daggers should be carried only on walking out dress. On full dress, evening dress and campaign dress, the M. 1870 Navy swords were still in use.
In fact, as for the swords, a lot of models of daggers, of different shapes, dimensions and origins, were carried. The most well-known producers were Carl Eickhorn and Alex. Coppel of Solingen.
Officially these daggers were distributed to the students of the Navy Academy. The Navy officers should carry M.1930 swords for the ceremonial and gala uniforms. However these weapons were too uncomfortably and expensive and sometimes, for special events, Navy officers continued to carry daggers.
There was also a M.1921 Navy students dagger. This weapon had a straight four edges blade, a spiral black bone grip with a crown-shape pommel and a cross-guard decorated with an anchor. The scabbard was in black leather with locket, chape and loose-rings made in brass. The M.1921 Navy students dagger was officially replaced by the M.1921 Navy officer model in 1930.
PMEmail Poster
Top
aviatiadasenzatia
Posted: August 29, 2006 01:24 pm
Quote Post


Sergent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 177
Member No.: 391
Joined: November 18, 2004



QUOTE (Wings_of_wrath @ May 29, 2006 05:41 am)
QUOTE (Carol I @ Jan 2 2006, 03:55 PM)
I think there still is some difference between the two daggers. The one from eBay appears to be "pointier" than the one in your collection. Also, the relative length of the blades compared to the handles seems to be different.

user posted image

user posted image

Although I know nothing about WW2 ceremonial daggers, this sure looks to my untrained eyes like a re-sharpened Naval Cadet dagger...
I did see similar cases with all sorts of bladed weapons, especially concerning "refinished" bayonets passed off as genuine in shops around Bucharest.

Take a look at the angle of the blade , at the shape and you will see it wasn't re-sharpened. It was designed to be so small. The blade has continuous line , not like the re-sharpened blades ....
PMEmail Poster
Top
JimW
Posted: September 29, 2008 11:14 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Member No.: 2259
Joined: September 29, 2008



I found you guys on a search and was wondering if you could look at these. Some I see here are similar.

When checking the photos, I have then all on one photo. The navy's that is.

Jim

user posted imageuser posted image

This post has been edited by JimW on September 29, 2008 11:20 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
JimW
Posted: September 29, 2008 11:22 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Member No.: 2259
Joined: September 29, 2008



I can also use some help on the best way to post photos here. I have the 1921 Air Force as well as a couple of Army officers I would like comments on.

Thank you

Jim.

PMEmail Poster
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (3) 1 [2] 3  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0092 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]