Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (3) 1 [2] 3 ( Go to first unread post ) |
aviatiadasenzatia |
Posted: January 02, 2006 11:08 am
|
||
Sergent Group: Members Posts: 177 Member No.: 391 Joined: November 18, 2004 |
The blade wasn't broke and is not Mini Air Force dagger . This dagger is a marine cadet dagger . I have a similar one. This is the normal way how they looked. |
||
Carol I |
Posted: January 02, 2006 02:03 pm
|
||||
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
May we see your dagger? |
||||
aviatiadasenzatia |
Posted: January 02, 2006 02:18 pm
|
Sergent Group: Members Posts: 177 Member No.: 391 Joined: November 18, 2004 |
|
Carol I |
Posted: January 02, 2006 02:22 pm
|
||
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
Thanks. |
||
aviatiadasenzatia |
Posted: January 02, 2006 03:46 pm
|
Sergent Group: Members Posts: 177 Member No.: 391 Joined: November 18, 2004 |
|
Carol I |
Posted: January 02, 2006 03:55 pm
|
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
I think there still is some difference between the two daggers. The one from eBay appears to be "pointier" than the one in your collection. Also, the relative length of the blades compared to the handles seems to be different.
|
REGAL UNIFORMA COLECTOR |
Posted: May 29, 2006 01:39 am
|
General de brigada Group: Members Posts: 1079 Member No.: 198 Joined: January 18, 2004 |
|
REGAL UNIFORMA COLECTOR |
Posted: May 29, 2006 01:41 am
|
General de brigada Group: Members Posts: 1079 Member No.: 198 Joined: January 18, 2004 |
|
REGAL UNIFORMA COLECTOR |
Posted: May 29, 2006 01:43 am
|
General de brigada Group: Members Posts: 1079 Member No.: 198 Joined: January 18, 2004 |
|
REGAL UNIFORMA COLECTOR |
Posted: May 29, 2006 01:44 am
|
General de brigada Group: Members Posts: 1079 Member No.: 198 Joined: January 18, 2004 |
|
Wings_of_wrath |
Posted: May 29, 2006 05:41 am
|
||
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 136 Member No.: 809 Joined: February 04, 2006 |
Although I know nothing about WW2 ceremonial daggers, this sure looks to my untrained eyes like a re-sharpened Naval Cadet dagger... I did see similar cases with all sorts of bladed weapons, especially concerning "refinished" bayonets passed off as genuine in shops around Bucharest. |
||
Kepi |
Posted: May 29, 2006 06:13 am
|
Sublocotenent Group: Members Posts: 432 Member No.: 680 Joined: September 28, 2005 |
There were not daggers in the Romanian Navy during WW1, at least not officially.
The first Navy daggers were adopted by the Royal Decree Nr. 2008 of 12th of May 1921. According this document, the Navy officers daggers should have the grip made in ivory, of elliptical shape, with the pommel of a crown shape. The cross guard had a rectangular central body decorated with an inclined anchor, and had two extreme round quillons. The blade was straight double edged, and the scabbard was made in brass and had two loose-rings. These daggers should be carried only on walking out dress. On full dress, evening dress and campaign dress, the M. 1870 Navy swords were still in use. In fact, as for the swords, a lot of models of daggers, of different shapes, dimensions and origins, were carried. The most well-known producers were Carl Eickhorn and Alex. Coppel of Solingen. Officially these daggers were distributed to the students of the Navy Academy. The Navy officers should carry M.1930 swords for the ceremonial and gala uniforms. However these weapons were too uncomfortably and expensive and sometimes, for special events, Navy officers continued to carry daggers. There was also a M.1921 Navy students dagger. This weapon had a straight four edges blade, a spiral black bone grip with a crown-shape pommel and a cross-guard decorated with an anchor. The scabbard was in black leather with locket, chape and loose-rings made in brass. The M.1921 Navy students dagger was officially replaced by the M.1921 Navy officer model in 1930. |
aviatiadasenzatia |
Posted: August 29, 2006 01:24 pm
|
||||
Sergent Group: Members Posts: 177 Member No.: 391 Joined: November 18, 2004 |
Take a look at the angle of the blade , at the shape and you will see it wasn't re-sharpened. It was designed to be so small. The blade has continuous line , not like the re-sharpened blades .... |
||||
JimW |
Posted: September 29, 2008 11:14 pm
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 3 Member No.: 2259 Joined: September 29, 2008 |
|
JimW |
Posted: September 29, 2008 11:22 pm
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 3 Member No.: 2259 Joined: September 29, 2008 |
I can also use some help on the best way to post photos here. I have the 1921 Air Force as well as a couple of Army officers I would like comments on.
Thank you Jim. |
Pages: (3) 1 [2] 3 |