Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (2) 1 [2]   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> A Romanian SS officer at the Battle of Bulge?, Please make us clear
Florin
Posted: March 03, 2005 02:01 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1879
Member No.: 17
Joined: June 22, 2003



About the American movies regarding WWII...

Come on, this is a serious Forum! Let discuss historical matters in the subject directories like this, and to give to the American movies what is theirs: the General discussion group of topics.
PM
Top
ostuf Charlemagne
Posted: March 03, 2005 09:33 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Member No.: 527
Joined: February 27, 2005



Quote : "BTW: Rudel should ask himself why Germany did not supply the Romanian Army with 75 mm PAK's, the only thing which could stop a T-34, and why the Romanian Army, having 4 full armies engaged alongside Germany, received only 11 (eleven) modern tanks as supply (the Pz-IV's)."


No need to ask . The rumanian army which was covering the flank of the VI army during the Stalingrad's offensive ,asked repeatedly the germans for antitanks weapons . Those requests were transmitted to general Wagner who was in charge of supplies for Estarn Front in the german staff (I don't remember if in OKW or OKH ) and he took great care NOT to send anything 'cause he was ( I am talking of gen.Wagner) A MEMBER OF THE CONSPIRATIVE NET OF TRAITORS : with general Becks , Witzleben , Count Stauffenberg , etc....and those people were already doing their best to provokes the defeat of Hitler ; ie .the defeat of Germany . That's why your rumanians troopers NEVER received this material .

So the russians attacked the rumanian army which was unable to hold the armored chock of the soviets in Stalingrad . It provoked the defeat of the VI.Army .Rumanians (and italians ) soldiers at Stalingrad didn't lack courage .They had just lack of antitank weapons .

This circle of military traitors acted the same way during the Battle of Normandy .After the german amry had retreated it was discovered in some french forrests near the front ,tonns of supplies : Panzer spare parts ,ammo,gasoline etc.... The german front commanders just didn't knew it ,and everytime they had to send convoys to Paris to pick petrol , oil ,ammo ,etc.... having all what they could have needed very near from them . And those convoys were under constant attack of US air force during the trip to go and comeback ,not talking about lethal delays .
Now who was in charge . In Paris : General von Stuelpnagel (conspirator) and -for the supplies in Berlin - general Wagner .

Now it could be possible that if those betrayals never existed , the rumanians could have stopped the russian tanks at Stalingrad . VI Army not circled .
Both Stalingrad and Normandy could have been german victories .
But nobody can change the past . At last we can explain it .
PMEmail Poster
Top
D13-th_Mytzu
Posted: July 18, 2005 06:32 am
Quote Post


General de brigada
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1058
Member No.: 328
Joined: August 20, 2004



Is this "CONSPIRATIVE NET OF TRAITORS " for real ? unsure.gif first time I even hear about such thing.I always thought the reasons to loose Stalingrad (not care about the flanks and not supply them with what was needed) was due to much simpler reasons like human nature and overconfindence.
PMUsers Website
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (2) 1 [2]  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0078 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]