Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Romanian Figther pilot losses in 1941-44
kalender1973
Posted: September 06, 2005 02:02 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Member No.: 665
Joined: September 06, 2005



I look for the statistic, how many romanian fighters pilots lost their live between 22.06.41 and 23.08.44 in the fight against soviet VVS (combat/ not combat killed, MIA, POW). If the summary information is available, it is possible that ARR is one of the most effective Air Force related own and opponent losses.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Cantacuzino
Posted: September 06, 2005 02:39 pm
Quote Post


Host
Group Icon

Group: Hosts
Posts: 2328
Member No.: 144
Joined: November 17, 2003



QUOTE
If the summary information is available, it is possible that ARR is one of the most effective Air Force related own and opponent losses.


I don't think that only fighter pilots were effective for opponents losses ( if you refer to air victories ). Also gunners from other ARR categories ( bomber, observation etc) were credited with many victories. And ofcourse ARR looses were at least two times more among gunners than the fighter pilots.

This post has been edited by Cantacuzino on September 06, 2005 02:41 pm
PM
Top
Dénes
Posted: September 06, 2005 03:18 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE (kalender1973 @ Sep 6 2005, 08:02 PM)
it is possible that ARR is one of the most effective Air Force related own and opponent losses.

I believe the way you intend to calculate ARR's 'effectiveness' is erroneous.

Efficiency should be calculated by the number of own airplanes, not airmen, lost in combat vs. the number of enemy airplanes destroyed, not airmen killed.

The real picture is even more complex, as airplanes lost to non-combat causes, the number of combat sorties vs. losses, etc. should also be taken into consideration.

Gen. Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
kalender1973
Posted: September 06, 2005 03:30 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Member No.: 665
Joined: September 06, 2005



QUOTE (Dénes @ Sep 6 2005, 03:18 PM)

I believe the way you intend to calculate ARR's 'effectiveness' is erroneous.

Efficiency should be calculated by the number of own airplanes, not airmen, lost in combat vs. the number of enemy airplanes destroyed, not airmen killed.

The real picture is even more complex, as airplanes lost to non-combat causes, the number of combat sorties vs. losses, etc. should also be taken into consideration.

Gen. Dénes

But the really problem for all sides in WWII was not a plane, but te pilots: The plane was easy to replace( even for Germany in early 1945), not the flying personal...
PMEmail Poster
Top
Zayets
Posted: September 06, 2005 06:05 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier adjutant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 363
Member No.: 504
Joined: February 15, 2005



Kalender is right.But even so,Romania couldn't compete with Soviet Union & USA war machine.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
D13-th_Mytzu
Posted: September 06, 2005 06:20 pm
Quote Post


General de brigada
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1058
Member No.: 328
Joined: August 20, 2004



...or german or british smile.gif

This post has been edited by D13-th_Mytzu on September 06, 2005 06:20 pm
PMUsers Website
Top
dragos
Posted: September 06, 2005 06:41 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 2397
Member No.: 2
Joined: February 11, 2003



kalender1973 wants some kind of a ratio between succeses and losses, in order to measure effectiveness of national airforces. I don't think this is possible unless the research is narrowed somehow, for specific branch or air missions for example.
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0078 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]