Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (2) [1] 2   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Aircraft at Gearmata lying in the open sky
carlos23air2004
Posted: September 16, 2005 03:23 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 49
Member No.: 670
Joined: September 13, 2005



if we go at Gearmata airport we may see a lot of aircraft lying in the open sky.for example in the northern part of the airport there are 2 twin engine transport aircraft (probably an-24 s) and one larger twin engine transport aircfat painted in white.Now east of the main parking lot for the larger transport (an-26) there is some kind of a hangar where there are 2 mig-21 in cammo painting and other 3 aircrafty probably mig-21s at theyr back ,following the same road we come across 7 lancers in cammo painting and 1 aircfat similar to a mig-23 all lying in teh open air.Now as we go north toward the main landig/take off strip we find another mig-21 and a helo probaly a iar-330 puma .if we continue our road towards east we find 2 large hangars painted in green,brown who dont look hardenned with concrete at all.facinf those 2 hangars are 2 swept wings mig-23s in retirement i think.East from those hangars is a an acees road who goes north towards teh main landing strip.In the s-e section there are around 28 mig-23s .The strip has a 29 marking at the end.And in teh extreme s-e corner is some kind of a radar station.The shadow uavs look like they are cocnceiled somewhere in those hangars near the transport aircraft.The base doesnt show any sam,aaa defences and ooks pretty vulnerable to a strike mission similar to the moked operation of teh israeli air force against the arab air forces..
I dont understand why the Romanian air forces doesnt have any concrete bunkers to protect its aircraft.And given teh fact that those lancers are verry close to the borderthe time they need to react at an atatck coming form teh direction of Hungary is verry short.I also dont understand why the shadow uavs are nera teh hungarian border when hungary is an ally.And those uavs dont have a greta autonomy so the only area that they could spy immediately is the boreder area with hungary and serbia.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Imperialist
Posted: September 16, 2005 03:45 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



QUOTE (carlos23air2004 @ Sep 16 2005, 03:23 PM)
The shadow uavs look like they are cocnceiled somewhere in those hangars near the transport aircraft.


Do you know for sure that the UAVs are based there? Because I dont see how something can look conceiled, unless their presence is expected there.


--------------------
I
PM
Top
tomcat1974
Posted: September 16, 2005 03:49 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Members
Posts: 263
Member No.: 427
Joined: December 20, 2004



hehehe... Man you should snap out of it... WE ARE NOT AT WAR ... WE DON'T HAVE ANY IMMEDIATE THREAT. smile.gif

The Shadow UAV where a Giarmata because they bellong to a former Recconesance Squad that flew Mig21R if I am not mistaken. But anyway ... Giarmata is not longer and active base for RoAF. The only active base that have fighter planes are Base 71th C.Turzi, Base 86th Borcea and Base 95th Bacau.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Dénes
Posted: September 16, 2005 03:51 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE (carlos23air2004 @ Sep 16 2005, 09:23 PM)
And given teh fact that those lancers are verry close to the borderthe time they need to react at an atatck coming form teh direction of Hungary is verry short.I also dont understand why the shadow uavs are nera teh hungarian border when hungary is an ally.

You're contradicting yourself.
Why would an allied country attack Rumania?

Gen. Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
carlos23air2004
Posted: September 16, 2005 03:54 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 49
Member No.: 670
Joined: September 13, 2005



Those mig-21 s in cammo where going for teh take of strip yesterday.Maybe its a secondary abse for refuel or something but its still pretty active given the fact that a lot of cars are oarked infront of teh main entrance.
PMEmail Poster
Top
carlos23air2004
Posted: September 16, 2005 03:57 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 49
Member No.: 670
Joined: September 13, 2005



I said that why should an ally country put its surveilance systems near the hungarian border when infact the ebst opyion would have been bacau.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Imperialist
Posted: September 16, 2005 04:27 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



QUOTE (carlos23air2004 @ Sep 16 2005, 03:57 PM)
I said that why should an ally country put its surveilance systems near the hungarian border when infact the ebst opyion would have been bacau.

Why should Israel spy on the US...? wink.gif
Ally to ally politics are not quite the flower-power "sa ne iubim pe tunuri" kind... biggrin.gif


--------------------
I
PM
Top
tomcat1974
Posted: September 16, 2005 04:35 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Members
Posts: 263
Member No.: 427
Joined: December 20, 2004



then the placing of the FPS-117 radar station at Timisoara will mean that we wanna check hungarian air space for any boggies . Right? smile.gif

This post has been edited by tomcat1974 on September 16, 2005 04:51 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
Imperialist
Posted: September 16, 2005 04:42 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



But I do think that surveilling an ally and even Hungary has nothing ominous in it, having in view the existence of:

Open Skies Treaty


--------------------
I
PM
Top
tomcat1974
Posted: September 16, 2005 04:47 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Members
Posts: 263
Member No.: 427
Joined: December 20, 2004



And a general rule.... in RoAF...mostly all the planes sit in open air... if is in hangers, then they are in repairs ... smile.gif
Still the rummors where that Giarmata and Kogalniceanu had HAS's a somewhere.
For example , at base 71 there is a SPAAG "divizion" with Gepards located in Campia Turzii.
Related to the SAM sites... that is actully classified info. I never saw a Romanian SAM site anyware. We do have some SA-8 close to Cluj and I think also Gepards.


This post has been edited by tomcat1974 on September 16, 2005 04:56 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
tomcat1974
Posted: September 16, 2005 05:04 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Members
Posts: 263
Member No.: 427
Joined: December 20, 2004



user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

check these ... Army Day last year ... copyright .... i guess ME wink.gif

This post has been edited by tomcat1974 on September 16, 2005 05:11 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
carlos23air2004
Posted: September 16, 2005 07:12 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 49
Member No.: 670
Joined: September 13, 2005



PMEmail Poster
Top
tomcat1974
Posted: September 17, 2005 10:40 am
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Members
Posts: 263
Member No.: 427
Joined: December 20, 2004



So what are those old pictures suppose to show..? the line of Mig 23's ..which don't fly from 2000 ? smile.gif
I think the base became inactive since Jan 2004. At the same date as MK. By Inactive means that they no longer register as being the home base of some fighter squads.
It was proposed to became a US base. sad.gif
PMEmail Poster
Top
carlos23air2004
Posted: September 17, 2005 10:54 am
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 49
Member No.: 670
Joined: September 13, 2005



In the second photo you cna clearly see 7 mig 21 s and one mig 23 in the right. And in teh first one you cna clearly see a mig 21 going for the strip and a chopper probably a iar 330 l.Now i didnt sya the base was fully operational cause there are a few mig-21s but it looks more like a refuel or a secondary base.
PMEmail Poster
Top
carlos23air2004
Posted: September 17, 2005 11:25 am
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 49
Member No.: 670
Joined: September 13, 2005



As you said the romanian migs sit all in the open ar and the mig 23 row is shown in the first pic where you can clearly see a mig-21 and that iar 330 .Its clear that the mig-23 s dont fly but those mig-21s are sure operational.and the pics are actually from 2005.
PMEmail Poster
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (2) [1] 2  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0084 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]