Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (5) « First ... 3 4 [5] ( Go to first unread post ) |
mabadesc |
Posted: December 29, 2008 12:02 am
|
Locotenent colonel Group: Members Posts: 803 Member No.: 40 Joined: July 11, 2003 |
Guys,
The germans had multiple projects of transforming various tank platforms into tank destroyers. The idea of using 38(t), pz I, pzII, pzIII, pzIV, V and VI chassis and transforming them into tank destroyers was well recognized and developed in Germany. Multiple parallel experimental projects and variants were in process. I have the same archival report from Dragos03 - I believe we obtained it at the same time, several years ago. It's interesting, but IMO quite inconclusive in establishing whether the German technical envoy - Ventz - was "inspired" by the idea of the "Maresal". Let's not forget the industrial capacity of Germany vs. Romania, and the number of projects the Germans had in producing prototypes of light, maneouvreable tank destroyers. Regardless, the Hetzer (whether "inspired" or not by the "Maresal") went into production (though too late in the war) and was very effective on the battlefield and ended up being used by the Swiss army until the 1970's. Were it not for the Hetzer, the Jagdpanzer IV (also reaching production too late), was very effective as well on the battlefield. The Maresal had the misfortune of not making it to production, unfortunately. In any case, let's keep things in perspective, however. I find the archival document very inconclusive and insufficient in establishing that the Germans inspired themselves after the Maresal. In any case, if it they did or not, the production of a light and nimble tank destroyer was a high priority on Guderian's list and it would have been developed anyway. No offence intended regarding the Romanian know-how, we had some smart and innovative engineers, but the country's industrial capacity for mass production of armored vehicles was limited at best. |
brano |
Posted: January 16, 2011 08:18 pm
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 3 Member No.: 1553 Joined: August 22, 2007 |
Hi guys,
i have question for M-06. Existing this prototype ? Your specifications... ? Existing summary for all prototypes in publications, website ...? Weight, lenght, wide etc....more data ? THX Braňo |
MMM |
Posted: January 17, 2011 02:55 pm
|
||
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 |
I don't know how to put it, but even this is an optimistic approach! @brano: check out this forum, search the terms and you'll get a result! -------------------- M
|
||
Alanmccoubrey |
Posted: January 18, 2011 02:46 pm
|
||||
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 38 Member No.: 1520 Joined: July 28, 2007 |
If this was taking place in Jnuary 1944 then the Ventz might well have been aware of the developement of the Jagdpanzer 38 but as it certainly wasn't called the "Hetzer" by the Germans yet why would he say such a thing unless he meant the proper meaning of the German word "Hetzer", which is "trouble maker". So perhaps Ventz just meant that the Maresal would cause the Russians a lot of trouble ? |
||||
ANDREAS |
Posted: July 21, 2012 01:20 pm
|
Locotenent colonel Group: Members Posts: 814 Member No.: 2421 Joined: March 15, 2009 |
TACAB M 06 plans from april 1944 found on the Internet, on a russian site:
http://alternathistory.org.ua/files/users/...ath-d3dhrbt.jpg http://alternathistory.org.ua/files/users/...ath-d3dhr12.jpg |
muggs |
Posted: July 21, 2012 02:18 pm
|
Plutonier Group: Retired Posts: 298 Member No.: 1499 Joined: July 05, 2007 |
If i remember correctly these are fantasy drawings made for a game.
|
Dénes |
Posted: July 21, 2012 02:25 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
If these are fantasy drawings, they are done with a great amount of authenticity. They can easily fool anyone, even specialist ones. This is partly a compliment, partly a warning to a potentially dangerous situation of faking history.
Gen. Dénes This post has been edited by Dénes on July 21, 2012 02:26 pm |
dragos |
Posted: July 21, 2012 04:59 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 2397 Member No.: 2 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
|
ANDREAS |
Posted: July 22, 2012 09:58 am
|
Locotenent colonel Group: Members Posts: 814 Member No.: 2421 Joined: March 15, 2009 |
I'm sorry, I didn't knew! The only doubt I had was about the drive wheels in front and rear that looks like Pz.III early version, which were no longer produced from 1941 I guess, but I couldn't be sure about it! Anyway it's good that we cleared this pictures problem right now!
|
Pages: (5) « First ... 3 4 [5] |