Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Body Armour
Imperialist
Posted: January 27, 2006 08:24 am
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



Does Romania produce its own body armour? Are all troops issued body armour, or are there the capabilities to do it?

You can discuss any other body armour related subjects here, if you wish.



--------------------
I
PM
Top
Agarici
Posted: February 12, 2006 07:03 am
Quote Post


Maior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Member No.: 522
Joined: February 24, 2005



QUOTE (Imperialist @ Jan 27 2006, 08:24 AM)
Does Romania produce its own body armour? Are all troops issued body armour, or are there the capabilities to do it?

  You can discuss any other body armour related subjects here, if you wish.


I don’t know how the things are in theory, but apparently from a few years (some of) the troops use those items. I can tell you that when serving in the army mad.gif (1997) the kevlar jackets were mentioned by the field manuals (as well as the new small caliber, NATO standard assault weapons), but I’ve never seen one. Tough a fellow who was transferred to my unit from FRR (Rapid Reaction Force) artillery told us that they were issued with kevlar helmets and jackets and with the new model AKMs; no big deal, he used to say about the jacket, just a few extra kilos to carry when marching…
We were still using the old 7,62 mm AKM. But since then I guess the things have changed…

This post has been edited by Agarici on February 14, 2006 06:05 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
nogras
Posted: February 06, 2007 10:43 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Member No.: 1312
Joined: February 05, 2007



Sorry to post so late… but better later than never… cool.gif

Yes, indeed, some things have changed…

A short mention…those mentioned in those field manuals were not NATO standard assault weapons… but the 5.45 assault rifle (NATO uses 5.56).

First, the AK’s… there are no more AK’s 47… instead Romanian Army is using today a domestic version of the AK 74 (more infos about it on NATO AK’s topic). These are not “new AKM”… it’s a similar but in many ways a different weapon.

About Romanian made body armour…
There are two types used by RoAr. :
- a lighter one, Kevlar helmet and Kevlar vest , protection level II (effective up to pistol bullets and metal splinters-used mainly by engineers, second line personnel, paratroopers, mountain troops, navy and some others), very similar, if not identical to the Israely one. Its weight is around 7 kilos (the body armour) plus 2.5 kilos for the helmet.
- a heavier one, standard NATO Kevlar helmet and domestic designed body armour. You could see it in photos with Romanian troops in Irak and Afganistan. The body armour is protection level IV (up to 7.62x51 mm bullet, the ammo used by Dragunov sniper rifle and PKM – the soviet light machine gun, used also by RoAr). Its total weight is close to 18 kilos (14 for the body armour and 4 for the helmet). The body armour could be wear in two modes: with the two Kevlar plates ( 36x30x2 – dimensions in cm, inserted in two pockets, on the front and the rear of the vest , in which case the weight is the one mentioned above) and without them, reducing its weight to 7 kilos (and, of course, its level of protection – to II ).
About the last one… it’s the body armour President Basescu (after one of his “trips” to Irak) mentioned being too heavy and unusable, in contrast to the one issued to Americans and other army forces in that area. What the public back home (and I wager Basescu also) didn’t now is the fact that the American body armour is level II… so, his claim that the Romanian soldier hasn’t got proper protection is (in my opinion) a wrong and not documented presumption.
PMEmail Poster
Top
nogras
Posted: February 07, 2007 04:09 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Member No.: 1312
Joined: February 05, 2007



… and some pictures… ( de second type mentioned in the previous post )

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
Iamandi
Posted: May 02, 2007 08:42 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004



Someone knows something about body armor history in Romanian Army? When we received first body armor suites?

Iama
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Agarici
Posted: May 10, 2009 10:32 pm
Quote Post


Maior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Member No.: 522
Joined: February 24, 2005



QUOTE (Iamandi @ May 02, 2007 08:42 pm)
Someone knows something about body armor history in Romanian Army? When we received first body armor suites?

Iama


I second Iama's question. Also, what about some basic data concerning the history of body armour in other armies (US, British, French, former USSR). Is there a certain point in time (or military episode - Granada Invasion, Falklands War, Afghanistan in the 80's) since when it started to be used? What about the "kevlar helmets" (versus the steel ones)? Were those issued first to special forces? I've done some internet search for that, but I've found no references to a clear timeframe.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Radub
Posted: May 11, 2009 08:29 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flak_jacket
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulletproof_vest
The US used body armour in the Korean War http://www.olive-drab.com/od_soldiers_gear...armor_korea.php
Body armour was used in the Vietnam War quite a lot.
Radu

This post has been edited by Radub on May 11, 2009 08:43 am
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Agarici
Posted: May 11, 2009 12:01 pm
Quote Post


Maior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Member No.: 522
Joined: February 24, 2005



Thanks, Radu! I've browsed the mentioned sources myself but i have some doubts concerning their accuracy. I mean, when looking at all the military photos/movies I have acces to, I see no general/widespread use of buletproof vests (for the common infantryman) until the first Gulf War in 1991. If they existed before, why weren't they used on a large scale? Was it because they were too heavy or cumbersome (like that Soviet steel brestplates), or because their effectivness was only marginal? I does not make much sens.

However, thank you for the quick answer.
PMEmail Poster
Top
MMM
Posted: May 11, 2009 01:03 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1463
Member No.: 2323
Joined: December 02, 2008



IMO, any bulletproof vest is not so effective because... it's a vest! It leaves the neck unprotected - and shoulders, too; if it's not paired with a helmet, it's almost useless in close range - if the enemy could aim at the head, that is!
It also depends very much of the caliber, type and distance of the firing weapon!


--------------------
M
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Radub
Posted: May 11, 2009 01:30 pm
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



QUOTE (Agarici @ May 11, 2009 12:01 pm)
I mean, when looking at all the military photos/movies I have acces to, I see no general/widespread use of buletproof vests (for the common infantryman) until the first Gulf War in 1991.

Agarici,
In WWII, the Flack Jacket was a feature of the USAF waistgunner.
http://www.liberatorcrew.com/15_Gunnery/Ph...istGunner_T.jpg
This features in some WWII movies.

The bulletproof vest (Flack Jacket) is a very distinctive feature of the Vietnam War and features in most Vietnam movies. Browse here: http://www.starpulse.com/Movies/Full_Metal...ULLMETJACKPS02/
Here is possibly one of the most famous photo of the Vietnam War.
http://www.fromthefrontline.co.uk/blogs/me...ine/vietnam.jpg
Do a search for Vietnam photos and you will find a lot of them, especially helicopter crews who were issued with them as standard.
http://www.olive-drab.com/gallery/photos/h..._vietnam_sm.jpg

Radu
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
MMM
Posted: May 12, 2009 04:37 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1463
Member No.: 2323
Joined: December 02, 2008



Well, does Romania produce armor-piercing ammo? Against the vests, that is wink.gif


--------------------
M
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Radub
Posted: May 12, 2009 04:56 pm
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



QUOTE (MMM @ May 12, 2009 04:37 pm)
Well, does Romania produce armor-piercing ammo? Against the vests, that is wink.gif

Of course they do!
"Body armour", as explained a couple of posts above, comes in different "grades". There is no body armour that can withstand every single type of ammunition, it may protect against some, but to paraphrase Qui Gon Jin, "there is always a bigger slug." wink.gif
Radu

This post has been edited by Radub on May 12, 2009 09:59 pm
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
MMM
Posted: May 15, 2009 03:11 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1463
Member No.: 2323
Joined: December 02, 2008



QUOTE
the common infantryman
from the Gulf War was, compared in many respects with the common ww2 infantryman, much like a Starship trooper among the Romanian soldiers of the 1980's. smile.gif The things evolved quite fast in the "Cold War"...


--------------------
M
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0079 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]