Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Peter |
Posted: March 01, 2006 12:40 pm
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 30 Member No.: 833 Joined: February 27, 2006 |
Does the Anti-Tank Company of an infantry division have 3 platoons, with 3 sections in each platoon, and each section has 2 AT guns? This would total 18 AT guns. Would 2 platoons have 37mm guns and the other platoon 47mm guns?
Thank you for all the help. |
Victor |
Posted: March 02, 2006 11:48 am
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
They were all 47 mm Schenider model 1936 AT-guns. An AT company of the 1st Armored Division (which had more than one in 1941-42) was made up of 12 pieces. I believe they were divided into two platoons of 3 sections each. There is no reason to consider that the infantry had larger AT companies.
|
dragos |
Posted: March 02, 2006 01:15 pm
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 2397 Member No.: 2 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
The three-platoon AT company of infantry division is according to the regulations of 1940. |
||
YAN |
Posted: March 15, 2011 11:15 am
|
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 56 Member No.: 2942 Joined: November 15, 2010 |
Was there a heavy weapons company with 6 x 37mm & 6 x 47mm ATGs & 6 x 81mm Mortars attached to each infantry regiment in 1941.
|
raevski |
Posted: March 18, 2011 01:18 am
|
||
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 64 Member No.: 1824 Joined: February 04, 2008 |
Correct, the 47mm were used as infantry support weapons. The Infantry division had an AT Comapny of 12x Bohler 47mm+ Malaxa tractor tow. 3x Batteries of 4 Guns each 2x Sections of 2 Guns each per battery |
||
Victor |
Posted: March 20, 2011 08:10 am
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
Yes. |
||
MMM |
Posted: March 20, 2011 02:53 pm
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 |
Well, there was in scripts / on paper, but according to more than one source (Otu, Botoran, C. Midan), the weapons were only about 40% enough!
This post has been edited by MMM on March 20, 2011 02:54 pm -------------------- M
|
Kiasutha |
Posted: March 20, 2011 04:52 pm
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 10 Member No.: 2810 Joined: May 24, 2010 |
I thought the Boehler 47mm's were used as "infantry guns" in the regimental support companies; and that the anti tank guns in the divisional company (towed by Malaxa when available) were the more powerful french Schneider 47mm guns.
Which is correct, please? Jim R. |
raevski |
Posted: March 21, 2011 03:50 am
|
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 64 Member No.: 1824 Joined: February 04, 2008 |
The Bohlers were licence built and way more common than the Schneiders.
The schneiders i believe were replaced as they wore out with Bohlers |
Victor |
Posted: March 21, 2011 10:23 am
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
Actually it is the other way around. Schneiders were produced by Concordia in Ploiesti.
|
YAN |
Posted: March 21, 2011 12:13 pm
|
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 56 Member No.: 2942 Joined: November 15, 2010 |
is there any amounts for each of the three different 47mm used by the Romanian army.
|
Kiasutha |
Posted: March 21, 2011 02:56 pm
|
||
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 10 Member No.: 2810 Joined: May 24, 2010 |
raevski: Sorry but I must disagree. Boehler guns were license produced by Breda in Italy, not by Romania. Romania bought guns made by both nations. Schneider guns were initially bought from France, along with a license to manufacture them. As far as I know, romanian manufacture of the Schneider 47mm continued throughout the war. I would think the Schneiders might have replaced lost or worn out Boehler/Breda guns, since it continued to be available from domestic production... Jim R. |
||