Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (10) « First ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... Last »  ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Allies of Germany
 
Most important German ally
Italy [ 31 ]  [31.00%]
Romania [ 78 ]  [78.00%]
Finland [ 9 ]  [9.00%]
Hungary [ 10 ]  [10.00%]
Slovakia [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
Croatia [ 1 ]  [1.00%]
Bulgaria [ 1 ]  [1.00%]
other one [ 8 ]  [8.00%]
Total Votes: 138
Guests cannot vote 
Imperialist
Posted on February 23, 2005 09:42 am
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



QUOTE
2. Japan- the strongest axis ally both economcally and militarially, was far too distant, to be of any direct aid to Germany, during the course of the war in Europe. Japan did not attack the USSR in 1941, which may have caused the fall of the Soviet Union. Instead Japan foolishly attacked the US!!... which brought the US into the war and only hurt Germany greatly.


Several things come to mind:

1. Supply lines. Very long.
2. Fuel use. Intense.
3. Infrastructure. None.
4. Speed. Slow.
5. Distance + Weather.

That campaign would have taken a lot of time and planning and effort. It would have probably been possible after Japan conquered South East Asia.
But that would have meant war with the US...

From their point of view, I think that the Japanese in turn think that Germany foolishly attacked the USSR instead of eliminating Britain. Which would likewise be an incomplete assessment.

QUOTE
Instead Japan foolishly attacked the US!!...


I think that was the least foolish thing she could have done, compared with a Siberian campaign in 1941.

take care


--------------------
I
PM
Top
Dénes
Posted on February 23, 2005 08:48 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



Earlier I posted a note regarding priorities of Germany regarding its alleies on a different sub-forum: http://www.worldwar2.ro/forum/index.php?showtopic=1793&st=75
I think it's appropriate to cross-post it here, too.

We have been discussing earlier about Berlin's priority in armament deliveries for Rumania and Hungary, namely which was a more important destination for Germans arms.

While looking for some info, I found the following note in a German document, related to the priority list of aircraft deliveries to Germany's allies, in 1942.
The document speaks for itself (Rumania first, Hungary last).
It has to be noted that priorities did somewhat modify later on.

Gen. Dénes

user posted image
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Der Maresal
Posted on February 26, 2005 12:07 am
Quote Post


Sublocotenent
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 422
Member No.: 21
Joined: June 24, 2003



Bulgaria had priority over Hungary~!
ohmy.gif

rolleyes.gif



This post has been edited by Der Maresal on February 26, 2005 12:08 am
PMMSN
Top
Max
Posted on March 15, 2006 09:00 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Member No.: 850
Joined: March 15, 2006



Hello,
choosing between Romania, Italia and Finland it's kind of hard in my opinion, too different situations.
I think that all of them had a big part in the fight against Soviet Union.
By the way, Italy after 1943 become officially allied of the USA & Co. but with a very low efforts.
The RSI side (still allied with Germany) had a very big part in the fighting and not only in Italy.
Few weeks after the 8th september 1943 on the way to Rome, the allies fought hard against many Germans but also with the Xa Mas (Barbarigo battallion), Italian Parachutist and other Italian forces.
Till the end of the Third Reich Italy was ïn action even in the Baltic sea with their "pioneers".

I know it's not to compare with Romania, Finland and Italia but Holland gave also a big help, indeed, the Netherlands gave the biggest amount of volounteers to the Waffen SS then other European Countries.

regards,

Max
PMEmail Poster
Top
yogy
Posted on March 16, 2006 06:40 pm
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 72
Member No.: 567
Joined: April 14, 2005



I think Italy is the most important "ally".

They influenced the war much stronger then any other ally by

1. opening a front on their own two times, and both times the Germans had to come to help
2. being the first of all partners to leave the Axis.

So, beware your friends.. they might be your enemy soon rolleyes.gif .


PS: I can full yunderstand that Italy chose to end thewar pretty early. And I feel sorry that their country became a battlefield so long. ALso, I am happy that not so much was estroyed there, potentially, desaster could have struck european legacy when it comes to buildings, arts etc. unsure.gif .

PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
D13-th_Mytzu
Posted on March 16, 2006 08:16 pm
Quote Post


General de brigada
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1058
Member No.: 328
Joined: August 20, 2004



Also a very good thing is they did not come udner comunist rule smile.gif
PMUsers Website
Top
sid guttridge
Posted on April 03, 2006 01:24 pm
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 862
Member No.: 591
Joined: May 19, 2005



Hi Guys,

Italy was without doubt the most important German ally militarily.

For a start it had a navy that was, in theory, at least as powerful as Germany's. None of Germany's other Eurpean allies could match that.

Italy also had a significant self sufficient air force and aircraft industry that outweighed those of all Germany's other allies put together. All Germany's other allies produced or imported Italian aircraft.

Only the Italian Army was matched by any other of Germany's allies, and that was Romania in 1941-1942. At the time of Stalingrad there were at least as many Romanian divisions on a main battle front as there were Italian divisions in North Africa and Russia combined. However, if Italy's occupation forces in Yugoslavia, Albania and Greece are included, the Italians had for more Army troops on foreign service than Romania.

Italy without question.

Cheers,

Sid.



PMEmail Poster
Top
Chutzpah
Posted on June 02, 2006 09:29 am
Quote Post


Soldat
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 33
Member No.: 922
Joined: May 22, 2006



It goes without saying that the best ally of Germany was the White Rose.

Now if you ask me who was the best allies of the Nazis I might come up with a different answer rolleyes.gif

PS Yeah Italy, hands down.

This post has been edited by Chutzpah on June 02, 2006 09:30 am
PMEmail Poster
Top
sid guttridge
Posted on June 02, 2006 02:27 pm
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 862
Member No.: 591
Joined: May 19, 2005



Hi Denes,

Do you think that the fact that Hungary and Germany had entered into an arrangement for joint production of the Bf109 and Me210 in Hungarian factories might account for the low Hungarian priority in terms of deliveries direct from Germany? Unlike the others, Germany was giving Hungary major assistance to produce fighters and bombers in country, thereby reducing the need to supply them from Germany. In short, Hungary's aircraft industry was included in RLM production planning, whereas Romania's, for example, remained largely independent.

It is also worth pointing out that in 1942 Turkey arguably did better than any of Germany's allies in negotiating aircraft deliveries of modern aircraft from Germany. It alone got FW190s.

Cheers,

Sid.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Dénes
Posted on June 07, 2006 12:03 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE (sid guttridge @ Apr 3 2006, 07:24 PM)
Italy was without doubt the most important German ally militarily.

Excerpt from the overleaf text of the book 'Germany and the Axis Powers' by Richard L DiNardo (we discussed about this book, I just received it):
"It seemed that whenever Mussolini acted on his own, it was bad news for Hitler."

Gen. Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
saudadesdefrancesinhas
Posted on June 08, 2006 08:54 am
Quote Post


Sergent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 179
Member No.: 883
Joined: April 16, 2006



Perhaps 'important' does not necessarily mean useful or advantageous to the Germans, only playing a significant role of some kind.

The Italians would rank as highly important for the reasons Sid outlined, as well as the fact that the defects and short comings in their conduct of the war led to large scale problems and diversions for the Germans.

For this reason Mussolini and his erratic direction of the Italian war effort could be considered as a useful asset to the United Nations countries, helping boost their morale at times of crisis (eg. the successes gained by the British and Empire forces in North and East Africa in 1940-41), and throwing spanners into the works of Hitlers plans at vital points.

Italy was also significant in limiting the scope of German diplomatic efforts in Western Europe and Africa; the Italian alliance complicated relations with Vichy France, and also made sure it was difficult to convince General Franco to enter the war on the Axis side.

In terms of which ally was most important in terms of being useful to the Third Reich, I would say Romania. I agree with Chutzpah that Germany's best allies were the people who resisted Nazi rule in anyway, and perhaps, later when rebuilding a better Germany after the war, the United States and France.
PMEmail Poster
Top
sid guttridge
Posted on June 08, 2006 10:37 am
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 862
Member No.: 591
Joined: May 19, 2005



Hi saudad...........,

I would suggest that Romania only becomes a serious competitor to Italy as the most valuable ally to Germany when oil is factored in. Subtract Romania's oil imports and Germany would have been hard pushed to launch any major blitzkrieg operations after France in 1940 and the Italian fleet would have been quickly paralysed.

Cheers,

Sid.
PMEmail Poster
Top
D13-th_Mytzu
Posted on June 09, 2006 07:45 am
Quote Post


General de brigada
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1058
Member No.: 328
Joined: August 20, 2004



Substract romanian troops and germans wouldn't have entered Crimea when they did smile.gif
PMUsers Website
Top
mabadesc
Posted on June 14, 2006 02:44 pm
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 803
Member No.: 40
Joined: July 11, 2003



QUOTE
Substract romanian troops and germans wouldn't have entered Crimea when they did


I would also add, it's doubtful whether the Germans could have held on to Crimea in December '41 - January '42, after the Soviet landings at Feodosya and Kerch.
PM
Top
D13-th_Mytzu
Posted on June 14, 2006 03:13 pm
Quote Post


General de brigada
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1058
Member No.: 328
Joined: August 20, 2004



Indeed - extract the romanian units found in Feodosia area and the germans would have been in big trouble.

This post has been edited by D13-th_Mytzu on June 14, 2006 03:14 pm
PMUsers Website
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (10) « First ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... Last » Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0171 ]   [ 17 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]