Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (6) « First ... 3 4 [5] 6 ( Go to first unread post ) |
Hadrian |
Posted: August 09, 2009 05:47 pm
|
Sergent major Group: Members Posts: 245 Member No.: 875 Joined: April 09, 2006 |
I presume we shall increase our presence in Afghanistan. Things agravated a little lately there.
|
MMM |
Posted: August 10, 2009 11:23 am
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 |
Indeed! So, instead of having soldiers in two countries (I leave aside the "off-topic" Kosovo ) we'll have more in one country, that's your point?
A question, undoubtedly rhetorical as far as it concerns the military authorities in charge there: wouldn't one change the approach if there are no results? Shouldn't international forces do different things? And perhaps the most important question: should Afghanistan remain a single state? -------------------- M
|
Hadrian |
Posted: August 10, 2009 02:14 pm
|
Sergent major Group: Members Posts: 245 Member No.: 875 Joined: April 09, 2006 |
Maybe a european-style "soft ower" approach would be better than the american hard power approach, but at the time the americans call the shots, the europeans are just making the minimal comitment requested from them.
Truth is that afghans can not be conquested by force, hey demonstrated this so many times. Finnaly, the coalition will have to leave, just like the russians and british and others did... But on the other side we must fullfill our obligations. After 9/11 the americans invoked the common defence clause from the NATO countries, and we are now NATO. We asked for it... On the other hand, sending several hundreds in Afghanistan is better than keeping a full army prepared at the eastern borders.. http://www.nineoclock.ro/index.php?page=de...20090810-501478 "These kinds of missions will take place in an interval of approximately 30-40 years"... Seems we`re there to stay. This post has been edited by Hadrian on August 11, 2009 10:47 am |
contras |
Posted: January 04, 2010 06:30 pm
|
||
Maior Group: Members Posts: 732 Member No.: 2693 Joined: December 28, 2009 |
It was suicide, and it was first Romanian killed in Iraq. |
||
contras |
Posted: January 04, 2010 07:29 pm
|
Maior Group: Members Posts: 732 Member No.: 2693 Joined: December 28, 2009 |
Captain Petre Tiberius, who was KIA in Afghanistan in 4 April 2009, was part of Battalion 1 Vulturii Targu Mures. Intersting, they were part of a mission of "seek and destroy", side by side with American Delta Force.
See bellow: http://www.realitatea.net/video_771476_mil...ani_515896.html |
Imperialist |
Posted: February 23, 2010 11:19 pm
|
||
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005 |
One soldier killed, one seriously wounded in Afghanistan:
-------------------- I
|
||
Victor |
Posted: February 24, 2010 01:04 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
Can anyone enlighten me as to why the Humvee is preferred to our older recon TABs? I don't think it offers better protection to IEDs or does it?
|
21 inf |
Posted: February 24, 2010 02:47 pm
|
General de corp de armata Group: Retired Posts: 1512 Member No.: 1232 Joined: January 05, 2007 |
Everything depends on the dimension of IED. There are IEDs capable to destroy an Abramas tank, made from great calibre artilery shells.
|
Vici |
Posted: February 24, 2010 03:58 pm
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 138 Member No.: 2455 Joined: April 18, 2009 |
This IED was not too big - just one dead (at the hospital) and one badly injured out of 5 in the Humvee. The casualities would have been less severe if a TAB - or even better, a Piranha would have been in its place.
Victor, my speculation is that the Humvee is used because it's more reliable and cheaper to operate than the TABs. Anyway, it is possible that the convoy was made up of different vehicle types (mixed TAB + Humvee) for tactical or operational reasons. Anybody know the current status of the Piranhas? last time I checked 6 were in Afghanistan, exactly at Lagman base since September 2008 This post has been edited by Vici on February 24, 2010 04:00 pm |
Hadrian |
Posted: February 24, 2010 07:42 pm
|
Sergent major Group: Members Posts: 245 Member No.: 875 Joined: April 09, 2006 |
Posibly the Humvees have add-on armor. The TAB`s only protect against 7,62 caliber bullets, nothing more. And use more fuel. The TAB`s could anyway be uparmored with cage armor (against RPG), titan plates under driver`s place, and wheels filled with water. Than they would be better than a Humvee.
|
Vici |
Posted: February 25, 2010 04:16 pm
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 138 Member No.: 2455 Joined: April 18, 2009 |
The Humvees used over there are definitely armored. Even the MoD communique mentioned "armoured vehicle". I don't know if this armour is superior to the TAB or not, but I believe it's largely in the same category.
But this is not all about the brute resistance of the armor, its position relative to and distance from the explosive charge is also important. The Humvee has a perfectly flat bottom relatively close to the ground, while the TAB's and Piranhas have an upwards sloped armour on the sides, while the bottom is higher than on the Humvee. |
contras |
Posted: February 26, 2010 09:25 pm
|
Maior Group: Members Posts: 732 Member No.: 2693 Joined: December 28, 2009 |
Maybe it was just a "light patrol" on Humvee, on highway Kandahar-Kabul.
|
Imperialist |
Posted: July 19, 2010 08:56 pm
|
||
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005 |
-------------------- I
|
||
Vici |
Posted: May 12, 2011 05:47 pm
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 138 Member No.: 2455 Joined: April 18, 2009 |
Death toll for Afghanistan is up at 19 now (14 of them due to IED blasts) and 56 wounded.
|
contras |
Posted: December 02, 2011 09:47 pm
|
Maior Group: Members Posts: 732 Member No.: 2693 Joined: December 28, 2009 |
|
Pages: (6) « First ... 3 4 [5] 6 |