Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (20) « First ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... Last »  ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> War in the middle east, why oh why?
AlexC
Posted: August 21, 2006 11:00 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 75
Member No.: 786
Joined: January 19, 2006



Considering that Hezbollah didn't even exist before the 80's invasion of Lebanon when the south Lebanese shias actually WELCOMED the Israeli troops but the occupation turned them against Israel and formed Hezbollah with Iranian help to drive out the invaders and that in the 18 years of occupation Hezbollah only became stronger and stronger I don't know what the Israelis hoped to achieve in this war only to make Hez even stronger. There is no military solution.
PMEmail Poster
Top
sid guttridge
Posted: August 21, 2006 11:57 am
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 862
Member No.: 591
Joined: May 19, 2005



Hi C-2,

Where does this anti-Arab diatribe come from?

One can't generalise so sweepingly about entire peoples. Combat performance is a cultural thing and varies over time. (Look at the Battles of Rossbach and Jena if you want to see how far the pendulum can swing between two peoples in just half a century). Stick the Arab Arab and Israeli in a trench with a bayonet each and it is anybody's money who is going to come out alive. Israelis aren't inherently braver, tougher or more warlike than Arabs, but their wider culture is more educated and developed and they are able to use advanced weaponry more effectively as a force magnifier to make up for their more limited numbers.

In detail you are also inaccurate. The Israelis have had overall qualitative superiority in equipment, especially in the air, since the early 1950s, largely by buying or developing Western or their own weapons systems of a more advanced technological standard than the Arab Warsaw Pact equipment.

Israeli Shermans had little role in 1973 and besides were not of WWII standard, having been up-gunned in the meantime. UZIs were never decisive in any conflict. American help did not just arrive during and after the 1973 war. Much US equipment was already in service. Where do you think all the Skyhawks came from?

Where on earth do you get the idea from that Israel is some sort of bulwark against an Arab/Muslim invasion of Europe? It is, in fact, the last Western-founded colony. Its very existence has been a provocation to several hundred million Muslims for over half a century. What is more, the West's support for or toleration of Israel has turned much of the Muslim world away from secular Western values and towards Islamic fundamentalism. If the West does come under collective attack from the Muslim world it will be less despite Israel's defence and more because of Israel's existence.

Cheers,

Sid.

PMEmail Poster
Top
Zayets
Posted: August 21, 2006 12:28 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier adjutant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 363
Member No.: 504
Joined: February 15, 2005



Ah Sid, but it was never the discussion over Israel (as a state) genesis. It was about this very specific war.Of course, one can argue that this has something to do with, but we are not looking for the roots of this bloody conflict.It is clear that none of the parts will ever give up,and that makes me wonder how much was invested in a REAL peace treaty. While I agree that Israel is not the show stopper for "Muslim/Arab expansion of Europe", I can say for sure they are the ones actually dealing with their guerillas. For the moment this is an isolated conflict, but unlike you I really doubt that all Israel neighbors , together can overrun this country.Given the fact that Israel stated not only once that they will use ANY means (that would include atomic weapons) to defend their country, well ... one can understand the reluctance of these countries in a full scale conflict with Israel. They have to actually wait for Israel to invade (airstrikes not counted because they can't prove it unless caught) and hope for the whole Muslim world to raise for fight. Or, knowing the history, I am sure that Arabs are more inclined to accept the easy money instead of actually do the fighting.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Imperialist
Posted: August 21, 2006 01:10 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



'The Best Guerrilla Force in the World'

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...l?nav=rss_world


--------------------
I
PM
Top
Imperialist
Posted: August 21, 2006 01:34 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



QUOTE (C-2 @ August 20, 2006 06:08 pm)
But I'll tell you one thing;If Israel vanischez,then our grand children will be muslims.

I wander if you saw the street riots in France not long ago.90% were muslims.

The grand children will most likely be atheists, or christians just "on paper", than muslims.

Yes and in that context US support for Turkish entry in the EU is very "interesting".

Pope Benedict:
"The roots that have formed Europe, that have permitted the formation of this continent, are those of Christianity. Turkey has always represented another continent, in permanent contrast with Europe. There were the [old Ottoman Empire] wars against the Byzantine Empire, the fall of Constantinople, the Balkan wars, and the threat against Vienna and Austria. It would be an error to equate the two continents...Turkey is founded upon Islam...Thus the entry of Turkey into the EU would be anti-historical."

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/kralis/050420

The United States supports Turkey’s EU candidacy

http://useu.usmission.gov/Dossiers/Turkey/default.asp

This post has been edited by Victor on August 23, 2006 06:28 am


--------------------
I
PM
Top
AlexC
Posted: August 21, 2006 01:36 pm
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 75
Member No.: 786
Joined: January 19, 2006



Gophers by TKO: Lessons from Lebanon

QUOTE
By Gary Brecher

FRESNO, CA - It's not easy being right all the time. Way back on July 23, when all the suckers in the Mainstream Media were passing on the bullshit about Israel expelling Hezbollah from Southern Lebanon, I said Hezbollah was going to win every round of the fight. I took a lot of heat for that, but now, when you look through the smoking ruins of Northern Israel and Southern Lebanon, you see two things: the yellow Hezzie flag flying high, and the fat face of your favorite War Nerd sticking his tongue out at all the better-paid pundits who got it wrong as usual.

You know what "Mainstreaming" is, don't you? That's when they put retards in schools for normal people. And that's what the Mainstream Media is: a bunch of retards who don't know a damn thing about contemporary war, don't even want to know. It's Affirmative Action for fools, not just giving them jobs but shoving them in front of a camera to tell all the suckers back home how the good guys are gonna win, sleep tight, don't worry.

The funniest bit is the way desperate suckers are trying to spin total defeat of the IDF into some kind of victory. What's impressed me is that no Israelis are saying that. All the Israeli commentators I've read have faced up to the fact that they got hosed. It's the Americans, totally out of touch with reality and desperate to stay that way, who are finding lame excuses for the IDF, like "Hezbollah didn't really WIN, since they didn't wipe out Israel."

The best answer to that comes from an Israeli columnist I read, who said, "If a lightweight boxer fights a heavyweight and gets a draw, the lightweight won." Except I'm not sure it was even a draw. I think Hezbollah flat-out won, not just in PR/Propaganda terms but by anybody's standards. They're in total control of the field of battle, Southern Lebanon -- I hope none of you are dumb enough to think that this "International Peacekeeping Force" is going to actually try to disarm Hezbollah after the Israelis couldn't do it by force of arms. And I'll throw y'all a little curve by arguing that Hezbollah may even have had a smaller casualty count than the IDF. I can't prove it, and I'm not sure, but because Hezbollah fought smart and played defense most of the time, they may actually have had fewer KIA than the 118 the IDF is admitting.

The IDF isn't even claiming to have killed more than about 500 Hezzies, and that in itself is shocking. It means that the kill ratio, conventional army to guerrillas, is less than five to one. It should be ten to one at least. The Israeli Air Force tried to fudge those stats by blasting a lot of Lebanese civvies, about 900 or so, but that was just dumb, and it's probably going to cost the IDF C-in-C, Dan Halutz, his job.

Halutz is exactly the kind of idiot who'd feel at home with guys like Cheney: he's all tough talk and no performance. Halutz was a fighter pilot who got famous for sound bytes about how he loved dropping 1,000-lb bombs on the Pals, and he tried to run the war against Hezbollah the same way: by "shock and awe," blowing up apartment buildings and bridges, scaring the grandmas. Didn't work. The Shi'ites are way, way tougher than the Pals, always have been.

I remember back when the IDF first occupied Southern Lebanon, a teenage Shi'ite girl rammed a car full of HE into an IDF M113, killed a couple of soldiers, and one smart IDF Colonel said, "This is going to be bad. In 30 years of fighting the Palestinians, nobody ever did that to us." He sure was right about that. In fact, the Shia ran the IDF out of Southern Lebanon in 2000, and when they lured the IDF back in this summer, it took just one month to send the Israelis running south all over again, pretending that they're delighted to accept a UN peacekeeping force full of Muslim nationals whose countries don't even recognize Israel's existence, even though back at the start of this war, when they still thought they'd kick some Hezzie ass, the IDF was actually shelling UN outposts.

But back here in the US, we're supposed to think Hezbollah's victory is a disaster. But why, exactly? First of all, why are Americans are supposed to love Israel when there's never been much sign that Israel loves America? We give them three billion a year, and they give us little more than grief. Ask the crew of the USS Liberty -- no, wait, they're all dead, killed by an Israeli airstrike and followup machinegunning by Israeli gunboats, on a USN vessel flying the American flag. Ask the USAF generals who begged the Israeli Air Force to pass on crucial info on Syrian air defenses after the IDF's campaign against the Syrians in. The Israelis take any classified info they want from American intelligence, but when it was their turn to cough up some secrets, they stonewalled us. Fast-forward to Reagan's disastrous Lebanon invasion, when we lose two Navy jets against the same Syrian air defenses the Israelis had figured out years earlier. What did these guys ever do for us?

The worst thing a world power can do is pick sides in a non-stop tribal war for sentimental reasons. You know why we're speaking English and not French, thank God? Because way back in 1609, the French explorer Champlain hooked up with a Huron war party and headed south into New York. He liked the Huron, they liked him (the French had much more respect for the Injuns than the Brits, generally got along well with them) and when the Huron went into battle against a tribe they told the Frenchman was their hereditary enemy, he couldn't resist a chance to help his allies and show off his hi-tech military equipment. This being 1609, the hi-tech gadget was a huge arqebuse, more like a shoulder-fired cannon than a modern rifle -- but when Champlain lit the fuse, pointed the barrel at an enemy chief and fired, he made an even bigger impression than he meant to. Sure, he killed the enemy chief and probably got to strut like a 17 th -c. Pimp all the way back to Tribal HQ, and no doubt got a warm reception from all those Huron girls who wanted his Superbowl QB genes...but he also doomed the French in North America.

By the way, if you ask me what's really wrong with the French militarily, I'd say it's not cowardice at all, it's sheer impulsiveness, the kind Champlain showed that day -- too worried about looking good, not cold-blooded enough, no long-term plan.

See, the Hurons' hereditary enemy happened to be the Iroquois, who were not just the tribe next door. They were a six-tribe confederation, one of the few big, stable alliances among the North American Native tribes, with a reputation for holding a grudge forever. From the moment Champlain fired his hand-cannon, the Iroquois were the sworn enemy of the French and the allies of the English. It wasn't that the Iroquois actually liked the Brits -- I mean, who could like those snotty, slow-witted Redcoats?--but the Iroquois felt like Churchill in WW II: they'd have made a deal with Satan to get rid of those Froggy bastards who'd embarrassed them.

So even though the French knew how to make friends with the natives and the Brits didn't, the Brits had the biggest and most powerful tribe in the Northeast on their side. From then on, the Brits had the advantage. It took them another 150 years to take Quebec, but once the Iroquois swore vengeance, that area was as doomed as Constantinople.

We did a Champlain in the Middle East when we made Israel sentimental favorites back in 1948. But at least we had good reason -- giving the Jews a safe haven after Hitler tried to wipe them out. And at least Israel really was the underdog back then, before Congress handed them everything but their own aircraft carrier.

The IDF hasn't been a real underdog for a long time. Amateurs look at the map of the Middle East, see poor li'l Israel in the middle of all that Arab real estate and think the IDF is still the underdog. Nope--Israel was set up by a bunch of smart, educated Europeans, and when you match an army of those guys, backed by billions in US military aid, against peasant conscripts, only a fool bets on the peasants. Doesn't matter how much real estate they have, peasants in uniform are useless in conventional warfare against smart, motivated Western troops.

Till now -- till Hezbollah. Hezbollah chose when and where and how they were going to fight Israel. Here are the lessons they learned. Read'em and weep, because they work just as good against US armed forces and tactics as they do against the IDF:

First, most important lesson: take the defense tactically, the offense strategically. This ought to be a familiar doctrine to any American war buff because it was the policy behind most of our great victories, like Bunker Hill, New Orleans, and it's what kept Lee's Army of Northern Virginia on top against bigger and better-equipped Federal forces until Gettysburg -- and the only reason Lee lost there was because he abandoned the policy like a fool. Hezbollah took the offensive strategically by prepping the ground, Southern Lebanon, with a network of underground bunkers, then picking its moment to attack Israel while the IDF was busy kicking ass down in Gaza. The IDF, already under pressure for not rescuing that soldier kidnapped by Hamas in Gaza, charged over the border right into the trap.

Once they'd provoked the massive attack they hoped for, Hezbollah assumed the defensive, sticking to their bunkers and launching an incredible number of guided and unguided missiles against the Israelis. The most devastating weapon they have is the RPG 29, the newest Russian version of our old friend the RPG 7. The RPG 29 seems to be able to knock out the IDF's MBT, the Merkava 4. That's a big, big blow to the IDF, because the newer Merkavas are supposed to be invulnerable to anything but huge shaped charges laid as mines. They're equipped with all the latest tricks in anti-missile defenses, like reactive armor and screens that are supposed to make the warhead detonate prematurely -- kind of like premature ejaculation for RPGs. ("Oh jeez, sorry honey, I guess I just got too excited, your turret's so damn sexy....") The RPG 29 has a simple but effective counter for all this last-ditch defensive stuff: a tandem warhead, where the first warhead blasts the reactive armor or screen and the second, the really deadly shaped-charge one, has a free path right into the tank. By sticking to their bunkers, where they could fire from safety at the Merkavas, the Hezbollah antitank teams destroyed the Merkava 4's rep in a few weeks.

At sea Hezbollah used the same strategy: use guided missiles against high-value targets. Israel has been used to having control of the Mediterranean, and using its navy as low-cost, mobile artillery to blast enemy positions (and picnics). Hezbollah served notice that them days are over by hitting an Israeli gunboat with a guided weapon of some kind. It's not clear what they used, either an Iranian antiship missile or something homemade, some kind of model aircraft carrying a few pounds of C-4. Personally I'm hoping it turns out to be the Ace Hardware version, some dweeb's model Cessna, the kind you see sad Asian kids flying around your local high-school parking lot on weekends, modified by the Bill Murray character in Caddyshack -- you know where he makes models of the gopher's little friends, "the harmless bunny rabbit" and so on? I'm not sure what a Hezbollah model-airplane dweeb would make out of plastic explosive -- in fact, I'm not sure what a Hezbollah dweeb would look like if one even exists -- but it'd have to be something resembling IDF naval vessels' little friends, like a claymation US congressman with a sack of money in his teeth, maybe. Whatever it was, the contraption worked: killed four IDF crew, set the gunboat on fire, and taught the Israeli Navy a little respect.

Second Lesson: When you're fighting a force that depends on firepower and air power, DIG IN. Hezbollah has been tunneling out Southern Lebanon like those Caddyshack gophers from the first day the IDF vacated the area. They built reinforced bunkers, some with AC, designed to withstand air strikes and be used as firing positions for those new-generation anti-tank weapons. Just think for a second and you'll see that if you don't need to move, and stay underground like the Cong in Cu Chi, airpower can't touch you. The IDF kept waiting for Hezbollah to move aboveground but got nowhere, because the Hezzies had what the Germans call "fire discipline," the special kind of guts you need to stay still and not fire till the enemy's real close. The hotheads in Hamas have the more obvious kind of guts, attacking the IDF with small arms and old RPGs from the back of a pickup, but that kind of courage don't cut it no more.

Remember, in military terms, courage changes with the technology. When the Greeks fought one-on-one, courage was Achilles strutting up and saying, "I'll take the best guy you punks got." When the phalanx came into its own, courage meant NOT jumping out of formation on your lonesome but keeping rank, with your shield protecting your neighbor (or your bayonet, if you're talking the Redcoats' squares at Culloden in 1745). To fight and win the way Hezbollah did, courage is waiting...waiting...waiting for that Merkava to roll into the kill zone, not jumping up and firing your AK at Chobham armor.

And speaking of AKs, another lesson of this war is that the era of the automatic rifle as basic small arm may be ending. We may be heading back to some kind of shoulder-fired cannon (just like Champlain's!). Most of the IDF casualties in this war were inflicted by RPGs, just like most of our casualties in Iraq. The Chechen guerrillas have gone to a new formation, with three-man teams consisting of two RPG gunners with one AK man whose only job is to protect the RPGers. That may be the wave of the future.

Of course all these moves would've been wasted if the Israelis had caught on to what Hezbollah was up to, which leads to another lesson, one I'm always preaching: in asymmetrical warfare, Intelligence is everything. Or in this case, counterintelligence. Israeli intel, Shin Bet and Mossad, has been the real strength of the IDF for a long time. They're the best and most ruthless intelligence agencies since the USSR went bankrupt. But they had no idea what was waiting for them over the border. That's incredible, the most shocking news of all.

Remember, the IDF has instant access to all US military satellite intel, so this means that our tech intel was just as ineffective as Mossad's more traditional infiltration methods. That means Hezbollah, a huge organization with branches in every street in South Beirut and South Lebanon, has a scary effective counterintelligence branch. We all know the CIA is useless, but when Mossad and Shin Beth can't even penetrate the lower levels of a mass movement like Hezbollah, then the world has turned upside down.

And it has, folks. That's why this is such a huge, huge war. No matter what the waterheads on CNN try to tell you, the IDF lost totally, and every force configured like it -- such as, oh, the US Army or Air Force -- lost too. The Gophers are beating the shit out of the gardeners on this course. The gophers just kicked the shit out of Tiger Woods.

It's hard to say who gains in the long run. Short term, sure, Hezbollah wins big. But in the long run, maybe what's happened is that the day when genocide replaces the farce called "CI Warfare" just got a lot closer.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Suparatu
Posted: August 21, 2006 02:30 pm
Quote Post


Caporal
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 145
Member No.: 721
Joined: November 08, 2005



i liked the august cover of the Economist Issue. it said , quite simply, the truth -
Nasrallah wins the war!
PM
Top
New Connaught Ranger
Posted: August 21, 2006 02:33 pm
Quote Post


Colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 770
Joined: January 03, 2006



After reading the the bad article written by GARY BRECHER and posted by Alex C, dry.gif

Maybe this will provide a breath of fresh air: blink.gif

Prostitution Beats War tongue.gif

26 Iulie 2006 | de Gabi Golea JURNALUL NATIONAL.

One of the strangest cases solved by the Romanian secret services in the past 15 years was part of the operation for the evacuation of the Romanian citizens in Lebanon. It is hilarious, but we dare to say it is quite…Romanian. It involves some of our girls who headed East in order to earn some money.

After the tremendous effort of the authorities, which involved an unprecedented cooperation between embassies, ministries, internal and external secret services, military and civilian structures, some odd incidents appeared. Sources inside the Romanian secret services reported us a hilarious, yet interesting story. They did it for us to be able to see the kind of people confront with when they get involved in the saving of human lives.

SERIOUS OPERATION. The Romanian authorities had to help for evacuation of hundreds of Romanians from Lebanon. This country has become a real polygon due to the confrontations between Israel and Hezbollah. According to the data received from the Romanian External Affairs Ministry, 729 people have been evacuated between the 17th and the 20th of July with the help of three convoys organized in Bucharest.

HUNDREDS OF EVACUATED PEOPLE. The actions have continued after the three convoys as well, so, between the 20th and the 25th of July, 57 more people have been evacuated by sea with the help of several operations organized by the EU. These people arrived or will arrive in Romania under safety conditions and the present data from the Romanian authorities indicate a total of 786 evacuated people. 408 people have managed to leave Lebanon on their own, through Syria. Some of them have been brought into the country with the planes that transported the refugees on the 17th, 18th and 20th of July, the Ministry of External Affairs states.

SATELITE MONITORING. The hilarious part comes after the evacuation operations. One of the convoys that left Beirut with Romanian citizens had more than 120 people aboard. The convoy was monitored through satellite, had a detection signal, in order for it not to be bombarded. The Lebanese part as well as the Israeli one has been announced about all the exact dates: the hour and place of departure, the itinerary, the exact number of people, the type of the transport vehicles, the destination.

The famous "girls from Lebanon" have been in some of these buses. Of course, these were Romanian buses. They were nightclub dancers, some of them were prostitutes, but they all needed to run away from the war. Since no one cared about any lap dances due to the Israeli missiles and bombs, they didn’t earn too much either. So, the girls have also taken advantage from the Romanian operation and got aboard the buses going to Romania.

THE SYRIAN OPPORTUNITY. The indicated sources have mentioned that there has been an incident after approximately half of the itinerary had been covered. Once the convoy had reached the Syrian Alep harbor, they had to take a three-hour break until the embarkation to Romania.

"The girls in Lebanon" have found an opportunity to avoid coming empty handed to Bucharest. They have urgently left the place where the refugees were and quickly found a solution for two or three "rounds".

After the three hours expired, our Romanians have announced the authorities that they wouldn’t come to Romania, that they were grateful for the help, but they would remain in Alep.

They had found a good market in Syria and the opportunity of continuing with the job. Of course they got some money, because nothing’s for free. Far away from the Israeli bursting shell, the Romanian "hotties" contributed to the peace in the region the way they could.

The secret services officers, the representatives of the External Affairs and the ones of the Defense Ministry left the girls in Syria and continued the operation for the repatriation of the Romanians in Lebanon.

Translated by SORIN BALAN.

END OF ARTICLE:

Nice to see somebody other than the USA is making a little money out in the East rolleyes.gif

Kevin in Deva biggrin.gif

[edited by moderator]
PMEmail Poster
Top
Zayets
Posted: August 21, 2006 02:40 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier adjutant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 363
Member No.: 504
Joined: February 15, 2005



Funny. I don't quite understand what's the problem of this woman (article author) with the fact that the girls stayed in Siria "after unprecedenting [...] rescue mission from Lebanon". Heck, the objective was achieved, out of Lebanon,isn't it? If they want to stay in Syria, well, then stay,I completely agree with the authorities reaction. I don't think there's a lack of prostitutes in Romania because these left there smile.gif
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Victor
Posted: August 22, 2006 05:56 am
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



Several off-topic posts were deleted and a post was edited. Please stick to the topic and avoid getting personal about it.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Suparatu
Posted: August 22, 2006 06:34 am
Quote Post


Caporal
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 145
Member No.: 721
Joined: November 08, 2005



why do you think the gary brecher article was bad? i thought it was quite good. or do you believe the "good guys always win" propaganda?
PM
Top
120mm
Posted: August 22, 2006 02:57 pm
Quote Post


Caporal
*

Group: Members
Posts: 109
Member No.: 927
Joined: May 26, 2006



QUOTE (AlexC @ August 21, 2006 11:00 am)
Considering that Hezbollah didn't even exist before the 80's invasion of Lebanon when the south Lebanese shias actually WELCOMED the Israeli troops but the occupation turned them against Israel and formed Hezbollah with Iranian help to drive out the invaders and that in the 18 years of occupation Hezbollah only became stronger and stronger I don't know what the Israelis hoped to achieve in this war only to make Hez even stronger. There is no military solution.

Hezbollah was founded in the mid-'70s. As a purely offensive organization, designed to attack Israel. The media myth of Hezbollah being formed in response to Israeli actions is an indication of their ability to employ media spin as their best and most effective weapon.
PMEmail Poster
Top
AlexC
Posted: August 22, 2006 05:03 pm
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 75
Member No.: 786
Joined: January 19, 2006



No, not really Ehud Barak: Israel's Presence in Lebanon Produced Hezbollah

This post has been edited by AlexC on August 22, 2006 05:08 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
C-2
Posted: August 22, 2006 07:37 pm
Quote Post


General Medic
Group Icon

Group: Hosts
Posts: 2453
Member No.: 19
Joined: June 23, 2003



QUOTE (sid guttridge @ August 21, 2006 11:57 am)
Hi C-2,

Where does this anti-Arab diatribe come from?

One can't generalise so sweepingly about entire peoples. Combat performance is a cultural thing and varies over time. (Look at the Battles of Rossbach and Jena if you want to see how far the pendulum can swing between two peoples in just half a century). Stick the Arab Arab and Israeli in a trench with a bayonet each and it is anybody's money who is going to come out alive. Israelis aren't inherently braver, tougher or more warlike than Arabs, but their wider culture is more educated and developed and they are able to use advanced weaponry more effectively as a force magnifier to make up for their more limited numbers.

In detail you are also inaccurate. The Israelis have had overall qualitative superiority in equipment, especially in the air, since the early 1950s, largely by buying or developing Western or their own weapons systems of a more advanced technological standard than the Arab Warsaw Pact equipment.

Israeli Shermans had little role in 1973 and besides were not of WWII standard, having been up-gunned in the meantime. UZIs were never decisive in any conflict. American help did not just arrive during and after the 1973 war. Much US equipment was already in service. Where do you think all the Skyhawks came from?

Where on earth do you get the idea from that Israel is some sort of bulwark against an Arab/Muslim invasion of Europe? It is, in fact, the last Western-founded colony. Its very existence has been a provocation to several hundred million Muslims for over half a century. What is more, the West's support for or toleration of Israel has turned much of the Muslim world away from secular Western values and towards Islamic fundamentalism. If the West does come under collective attack from the Muslim world it will be less despite Israel's defence and more because of Israel's existence.

Cheers,

Sid.

Hi Sid,
About the question "why do I hate so much the arabs,I'll give you an answer.But I expect you to give also an answer to "why do you hate so much teh Israelies?

I really don't hate Arabs.
I hate fundamentalism extremism and people fro comits acts of terror.I hate people who put civilians life at risc.I hate people blowing themself up.I hate people who are taking hostages and hijaking palnes.
Sounds familiarisn';t it?
I have as much friend arabs as Israelies.
True that most arabs i know are cristians...
I had teh chance living for a period between israelies and arabs as well.
Did YOU also had this oportunity?
I may not have a degree in the history of the conflicts in the middle east,but I know much about it. More then most of so called experts.

When imperialist is posting stupid posts,I cand understand that. He's a person who most likely never leaves home often.
I did not expect that from you.

About the Shermans in the IDF.
They did had a major role in 73.
They were the only tank rezerve that stopped the Iraky column,and were ww2 tanks exept of the more powerful gun,and no night vission.If you ever heard about Yossi Peled....

The Uzi did was one of the best at his time.Jerusalem was taken with the uzi in 67. So Entebe in 76.
Ever fired one?
And yes I belive that Israel stands between us,the European and cristian culture and the islamic fundamentalism.Something similar of Leonidas at Thermophile.
Cheers!
PMUsers Website
Top
Florin
Posted: August 22, 2006 09:12 pm
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1879
Member No.: 17
Joined: June 22, 2003



QUOTE (C-2 @ August 20, 2006 01:08 pm)
...............................
.............Well you live in a democratic country,and it's your choice to like the arabs and hate the Israelies.
But I'll tell you one thing;If Israel vanischez,then our grand children will be muslims.
And every time American tax payer complains about the financial aid to Israel,I wan't to tell him that for HIS security,he better pay more.
I wander if you saw the street riots in France not long ago.90% were muslims.
They way they behave and act in a country that is making efort to get them civilaized.
Since I'm almost sure that you are not a muslim ,I belive that you never actualy met any....

You addressed to me the quote above. For the moment I did not want to answer, mostly because I respect and admire your interest in Romanian history in general, and in the history of Romanian aviation in particular.

Now you wrote to Sid:

QUOTE (C-2)
.......I really don't hate Arabs.
I hate fundamentalism extremism and people fro comits acts of terror.I hate people who put civilians life at risc.I hate people blowing themself up.I hate people who are taking hostages and hijaking palnes.
Sounds familiarisn';t it?
I have as much friend arabs as Israelies.
True that most arabs i know are cristians...
I had teh chance living for a period between israelies and arabs as well.
Did YOU also had this oportunity?........


First of all, I do not hate the Israelis.
But I do not like a policy of forced colonization and illegal settlement just because that area is designated "the promised land" for "the chosen people" in The Old Testament. You cannot force your way into the future based on a book written 2500 years ago. Yes, Sid is right, 70...60 years ago the Muslim Arabs where more moderate. The first broadcast of BBC in a foreign language was in Arabic (late 1920's or early 1930's), because the British felt that the Arab middle class was open to a part of the European values. Later, the foreign policy of Israel, combined with permanent American troops in half of dozen Arab states after 1991, and more recently with the invasion of Iraq, fed the blind bigotry and sick hate of many Muslims.
I dislike even more to see that people with no clues about a far away country gather in the Oval Office and decide to bomb, invade and destroy that country thousands miles away with the same easiness you would eat an yogurt.

OK. I am Christian, even though I am not entering into a church too often. Rather quite rare...
And yes, I knew many Muslims. As a fact, I worked for Shell in petroleum industry, as engineer, in Turkish Kurdistan. In New York I had Muslim colleagues in some previous jobs, and in the present one, and my supervisor is Muslim. He doesn't make noise about that, because he is too busy with everyday job problems. As a general rule, Muslims in the United States avoid politic comments, even in private occassions. I guess they see a Federal agent under every bush, and under every boulder.
You cannot label whole groups of people. People are good or bad, honest or jerks, correct or liars, but this have nothing to do with a whole group or with a religous group. There are evil people in any religious group, and good ones, in the same religious group.
I agree, a future with women being discriminated and forced to wear scarfs, face covers and down to earth dresses is very frightening. Adding to this, all men having beards and head covers would make the picture even more frightening. But I do not think the Earth will be "invaded" by the Muslim style society. Not because I hope so, but I do not think it will happen.
A more real danger: the more Muslim states will obtain nuclear know-how, the bigger the chances for some rogue groups to obtain a nuke for themselves, and to try to do harm then. Even if that will not be backed by a government, the danger will be the same.

This post has been edited by Florin on August 23, 2006 12:28 pm
PM
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (20) « First ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... Last » Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0125 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]