Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Weapons of the Iron Guard Movement
Der Maresal
Posted: November 09, 2003 12:58 am
Quote Post


Sublocotenent
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 422
Member No.: 21
Joined: June 24, 2003



When legionaires returned back home after the Spanish Civil war, they brough with them rifles, machine guns etc etc..

My question is what kind of weaponry did they have overall, especially when the rebellion in early 1941 took place and they came up against the army.
PMMSN
Top
Der Maresal
Posted: November 10, 2003 04:52 pm
Quote Post


Sublocotenent
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 422
Member No.: 21
Joined: June 24, 2003



Perhaps it was normal for a political movement in those days - to be armed - but I think today whey would be considered terrorists, wouln't they? :shock:

I documentary I have, shows the rebellion in 1941, and in it sais that the 'weaponry' of the army was far superior and in this "in-equal" confrontation hundreads of green-shirts were killed. :?
PMMSN
Top
Geto-Dacul
Posted: November 11, 2003 02:52 am
Quote Post


Plutonier adjutant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 383
Member No.: 9
Joined: June 18, 2003



See the legionnaire in the image (no. 2)? Most of them were armed with Mausers :wink:

user posted image

Best regards,

Getu'
PMUsers Website
Top
Der Maresal
Posted: November 11, 2003 09:27 pm
Quote Post


Sublocotenent
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 422
Member No.: 21
Joined: June 24, 2003



unfortunately i can't see the picture - but you can send it to me throught "other-means" :wink:
PMMSN
Top
Dénes
Posted: November 13, 2003 07:30 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



Here's an official news photo from eBay, with an interesting legend: user posted image
user posted image
"MAY RULE RUMANIA FOR THE NAZIS.
BUCHAREST, RUMANIA........ACCORDING TO DIPLOMATIC REPORTS FROM SEVERAL QUARTERS THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT BARON MANFRED VON KILLINGER (ABOVE), GERMAN MINISTER TO RUMANIA, MAY BE PROCLAIMED "GAULEITER" (DISTRICT LEADER) OF ALL RUMANIA, ASSUMING DIRECTION OF GERMAN EFFORTS TO QUELL FACTIONAL STRIFE THAT HAS BROUGHT A STATE OF CIVIL WAR WITHIN THE PAST WEEK. ACCORDING TO REPORTS, SEVERAL HUNDRED PERSONS HAVE BEEN KILLED SO FAR IN THE FIGHTING BETWEEN EXTREMISTS AND SOLDIERS OF GENERAL-DICTATOR ION ANTONESCU."

Did Hitler plan to actually occupy Rumania in January 1941?
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Geto-Dacul
Posted: November 13, 2003 07:44 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier adjutant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 383
Member No.: 9
Joined: June 18, 2003



laugh.gif

This is a bullshit press photo of Anglo-American propaganda... Killinger was never "gauleiter" and Rumania opened since November her doors to the German mission, so to the German forces. Hitler didn't occupy Romania... Antonescu requested the German troops, as a guarantee of security against a possible Soviet invasion, and later in 1941, for the preparation of Operation Barbarossa.

Getu'
PMUsers Website
Top
Dénes
Posted: November 13, 2003 08:14 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE
This is a bullshit press photo of Anglo-American propaganda... Killinger was never \"gauleiter\"

The photo legend says clearly: "THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT BARON MANFRED VON KILLINGER (ABOVE), GERMAN MINISTER TO RUMANIA, MAY BE PROCLAIMED "GAULEITER" (DISTRICT LEADER) OF ALL RUMANIA."
There could very well be German plans to occupy Rumania in case the civil war would have worsened.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Geto-Dacul
Posted: November 14, 2003 12:32 am
Quote Post


Plutonier adjutant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 383
Member No.: 9
Joined: June 18, 2003



Of course that the Germans may had a plan to occupy Romania, in order to prevent a Soviet intervention and the capture of the oilfields...
PMUsers Website
Top
Florin
Posted: January 08, 2004 05:40 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1879
Member No.: 17
Joined: June 22, 2003



QUOTE
When legionaires returned back home after the Spanish Civil war, they brough with them rifles, machine guns etc etc..


During the short skirmish between Antonescu and the Iron Guard, my grandfather, as military on duty, took part to the assault and conquering of the Iron Guard headquarter in Deva.

After the little battle, as he liked weaponry in general, he returned home with nice trophies: a big bag full of bullets and few portable machine guns. Generally speaking, the personal arsenal of my grandfather in the 40's was enough to equip several men. tongue.gif

Florin smile.gif
PM
Top
DevanG
Posted: February 04, 2004 09:26 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 17
Member No.: 213
Joined: February 04, 2004



mostly german weapons as the legionnaires were seen by the nazi as a way to obtain firm control of romania ( oil fields , metals , wood ) and thus had great importance for them ...
i remember reading somewhere of kar 98 , c96 , p-08 and p38 ( i'm not sure of the latter ) but they did have submachine guns ...
PM
Top
Brotherhoodofthecross
Posted: February 20, 2004 02:21 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Member No.: 223
Joined: February 20, 2004



My grandfather was a Nest Leader (Sef de Cuib) and had a Colt. He got rid of it (and of his affiliations) during the rebelion. Apparently almost all members of his family were powerful members of the "Fratia de Cruce" movement including Radu Gyr which was a his (second grade) cousin. Unfortunately those that managed to escape (and their kids) are all scattered around the world and my attempts to contact them and discuss about the family history failed.
PM
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0076 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]