Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (2) [1] 2   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Iron cross 1939 /facke or original
Claudiu1988
Posted: September 19, 2005 03:31 pm
Quote Post


Colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 943
Member No.: 398
Joined: November 23, 2004



I have an iron cross first class can you tell me if it's original or fake.

user posted image

user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
Québec
Posted: September 24, 2005 04:42 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 65
Member No.: 197
Joined: January 18, 2004



Hi! For the clipping mechanism, it looks original. But the best way to see if it's original, look at the side. If you see 3 sheets of metal laminated together you got the real thing!!!!!!!!
PMMSN
Top
Claudiu1988
Posted: April 01, 2007 07:42 pm
Quote Post


Colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 943
Member No.: 398
Joined: November 23, 2004



Alexei2102 I sow that you collect TR militaria. I'm not an expert what can you tell me about this Iron Cross, is it fake or original???
PMEmail Poster
Top
Mannlicher
  Posted: April 02, 2007 05:04 pm
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 89
Member No.: 998
Joined: July 19, 2006



Hello. Looks OK to me. cool.gif

For further info, you could use this forum: http://www.wehrmacht-awards.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=21. needs registration, but it's worth it.

Take care.


--------------------
®
PMEmail Poster
Top
Claudiu1988
Posted: April 02, 2007 07:11 pm
Quote Post


Colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 943
Member No.: 398
Joined: November 23, 2004



QUOTE (Mannlicher @ April 02, 2007 05:04 pm)
Hello. Looks OK to me. cool.gif

For further info, you could use this forum: http://www.wehrmacht-awards.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=21. needs registration, but it's worth it.

Take care.

Thanks I will try it.
PMEmail Poster
Top
New Connaught Ranger
Posted: April 04, 2007 11:03 am
Quote Post


Colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 770
Joined: January 03, 2006



Hallo Claudiu1988, biggrin.gif

I showed pictures of your Iron Cross at the GMIC Forum, the reply I got back so far from two members is this:

From Member "Danny 70": who included pictures of a known FAKE from his collection.

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

"I wondered if you know if it is a 3 piece cross? I ask because it looks very like this one piece fake (especially the hinge, pin and clasp on the back). I cannot tell from your pictures but it looks like it may have the same '800' mark on the pin too.

It may just be the lighting, but the paint on the core where it meets the frame looks odd too, also suggesting a one piece. The spacing of the beading at 8 o'clock looks irregular too,"


From Member: "Joel"

"I would have to agree with you seeing the comparison presented before me. It looks to be a one piece Kev. In the first picture in the upper left please draw your attention to the paint of the core towards the left arm of the cross. . . It looks as though it was applied after the one piece cross was manufactured and looks as though it forms a seal on the arm. Just my observation of course."

As with many iii reich pieces turning up in Romania & the world market, these have been extensively faked in Russia, Latvia, Ukraine, Poland etc, unless you have bought reference books and studied the subject carefully then you need to be very careful, as these have fooled even some of the experts.

Kevin in Deva biggrin.gif
PMEmail Poster
Top
Claudiu1988
Posted: April 04, 2007 12:13 pm
Quote Post


Colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 943
Member No.: 398
Joined: November 23, 2004



Thanks for the help New Connaught Ranger.

I will put more pictures with the iron cross from different angles and you can post them on the site so they can tell me if the cross is originall or not. The cross isn't marked with 800.

I will put the photos today.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Claudiu1988
Posted: April 04, 2007 01:02 pm
Quote Post


Colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 943
Member No.: 398
Joined: November 23, 2004



I will not post the pictures because the cross is facke, the core is non-magnetic. I think this tells everything.

Please ask them about this medal, what do they think??

user posted image

This post has been edited by Claudiu1988 on April 04, 2007 01:40 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
New Connaught Ranger
Posted: April 04, 2007 02:04 pm
Quote Post


Colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 770
Joined: January 03, 2006



Hallo Claudiu 1988 biggrin.gif

Can you please supply a picture of the rear, the gentlemen at GMIC always want to look at both sides before giving an opinion.

Kevin in Deva biggrin.gif
PMEmail Poster
Top
Claudiu1988
Posted: April 04, 2007 05:02 pm
Quote Post


Colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 943
Member No.: 398
Joined: November 23, 2004



Here are the pictures:

user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
Claudiu1988
Posted: April 04, 2007 05:03 pm
Quote Post


Colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 943
Member No.: 398
Joined: November 23, 2004



user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
Claudiu1988
Posted: April 04, 2007 05:04 pm
Quote Post


Colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 943
Member No.: 398
Joined: November 23, 2004



user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
Alexei2102
Posted: April 04, 2007 05:54 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1352
Member No.: 888
Joined: April 24, 2006



Hi Claudiu,

Sorry for responding so late, been busy at work.

1. EK 2 is a classic polish/russian garbage, but you seem to know that already, so that one is just for the record.

2. The KVK is another piece of junk.

Here are these photos from WAF (of an original MM84 "Carl Poellath Schrobenhausen") - check the MM - this is the first giveaway. Sorry for being the bearer of bad news.

Cheers,

Al

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
Alexei2102
Posted: April 04, 2007 07:53 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1352
Member No.: 888
Joined: April 24, 2006



Claudiu,

Almost forgot.

The best photos to base form a definitive opinion are the straight-angle photos/scans. The photos you posted of the back are taken from an angle. Perhaps photos with a better lighting and from a straight angle will help more than those already posted.

Also, some close-ups of the catch and hinge will be more than welcomed. And a close up on the MM too.

Perhaps these new photos will do the trick. Until then, I stick to my original opinion.

Cheers,

Al
PMEmail Poster
Top
Claudiu1988
Posted: April 04, 2007 07:55 pm
Quote Post


Colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 943
Member No.: 398
Joined: November 23, 2004



QUOTE (Alexei2102 @ April 04, 2007 07:53 pm)
Claudiu,

Almost forgot.

The best photos to base form a definitive opinion are the straight-angle photos/scans. The photos you posted of the back are taken from an angle. Perhaps photos with a better lighting and from a straight angle will help more than those already posted.

Also, some close-ups of the catch and hinge will be more than welcomed. And a close up on the MM too.

Perhaps these new photos will do the trick. Until then, I stick to my original opinion.

Cheers,

Al

I will post some new photos now.
PMEmail Poster
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (2) [1] 2  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0080 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]