Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (2) [1] 2 ( Go to first unread post ) |
Carol I |
Posted: December 05, 2003 03:43 pm
|
||
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
This is indeed surprising as I have heard that front line units removed very quickly the plates when they discovered that they "catch bullets" thus increasing the risk for a fatal wound. Carol I |
||
dragos |
Posted: December 08, 2003 08:20 am
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 2397 Member No.: 2 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
An interesting theory. I presume the spikes of WW1 helmets were "catching" bombs. In reality, the dutch helmets were ordered from Holland with the badge of King Carol II already attached, but since later Carol II became unpopular, from the end of 1940 the badges were gradually removed from the helmets. |
||
Carol I |
Posted: December 08, 2003 10:25 am
|
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
The theory is not mine. I have read it somewhere (unfortunately I do not have time to look for it now) and I was wondering if you have also heard of it. It was stressed that the plates were removed both for political reasons (Carol II's popularity or rather his unpopularity) as well as for practical reasons (increased risk for a fatal wound).
The original source did not say exactly how the plate would "catch bullets", but if this is true I could think of two ways. One of them might be that the plates played the role of a "bull's eye" for the enemy snipers (even though I cannot imagine why they would aim at the plate and not at the head or chest). The second one might be that the plates "trapped" the bullets making them spend all their energy onto one point (while only a fraction of the energy is lost in the deflection of the bullets) thus increasing very much the force of the impact. |
Carol I |
Posted: December 08, 2003 09:03 pm
|
||
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
Your theory for the WWI helmets is quite interesting, but I have a better one. The helmets were gradually taken out of use because those spikes were perfect lightning rods . |
||
dragos |
Posted: December 09, 2003 09:00 am
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 2397 Member No.: 2 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
As you can see in the picture below, the monogram has a low relief.
*** pic removed as requested by owner *** This post has been edited by dragos on May 04, 2012 05:23 am |
dragos |
Posted: December 09, 2003 09:06 am
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 2397 Member No.: 2 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
This story sounds like superstition to me. I'm sure there were plenty superstitions then. |
||
Carol I |
Posted: December 09, 2003 11:00 am
|
||
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
I agree that there were a lot of superstitions back then and maybe the helmet badge was one of them. But I was wondering if anyone else has heard of it and if there is any truth behind it. On the other hand it could be just an invention of the source I've read, but even this must have been triggered by something. Was the badge story confirmed by any veteran (as a superstition or as a true fact)? Thanks for the photos. |
||
SethG |
Posted: January 06, 2004 05:31 am
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 12 Member No.: 173 Joined: December 23, 2003 |
I've heard about and seen examples of the mongram defaced by soldiers but not removed. However, there is some truth to the theory that it would catch a bullet. Projections or sharp angles on glacis plates (vision ports, etc.) were often found to 'trap' a ricochet back into a direct course, but I can't imagine that anything already being deflected by something as flimsy as a helmet would penetrate if it caught the medallion. Might give the helmet a nasty yank. The theory is sound, but the chance of it actually taking effect in this case seems very small.
Seth |
drillsgt |
Posted: January 11, 2004 12:26 am
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 32 Member No.: 181 Joined: January 04, 2004 |
All armies have these superstitutions, however in reality such a device on the front of a helmet acts as a perfect aiming point, and head shots are usually killing shots. A bullet catcher among shooters is a metal trap behind the target, and a shiny metal device on the front of a helmet will certainly catch alot of bullets. Garry Owen!!!!
|
Carol I |
Posted: January 13, 2004 09:26 am
|
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
Thanks for your replies. So there is some truth in the story I've read regarding the helmet badges and therefore it was not a mere legend or an exaggeration.
|
peter_suciu |
Posted: January 20, 2004 04:07 am
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 12 Member No.: 160 Joined: December 08, 2003 |
Is it me or is the Romanian badge a little larger than the Dutch badge?
|
peter_suciu |
Posted: February 05, 2004 10:46 pm
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 12 Member No.: 160 Joined: December 08, 2003 |
What is the badge made of, were they all brass? That helmet I just picked up on eBay has a resin badge. Is this a reproduction or were some resin?
|
CCJ |
Posted: July 05, 2004 08:30 pm
|
Sergent Group: Members Posts: 183 Member No.: 286 Joined: May 29, 2004 |
What year were the helmet badges discontinued?
|
dragos |
Posted: July 06, 2004 04:10 pm
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 2397 Member No.: 2 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
September 1940 |
||
mihai |
Posted: July 08, 2004 03:20 am
|
||||
Sublocotenent Group: Members Posts: 450 Member No.: 30 Joined: July 08, 2003 |
it is after the time The King Carol Ⅱ'power was assumed by Antonescu. Mihai |
||||
Pages: (2) [1] 2 |