Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Mannlicher 1895 Rifle?
Overwatch
Posted: May 31, 2007 09:29 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Member No.: 1443
Joined: May 31, 2007



QUOTE
The main infantry weapon was the Czech ZB (Zbrojovka Brno) model 1924 rifle. It was modified version of the German Mauser 98 K. It used the standard 7.92 mm cartridge. The reserve units received the older Mannlicher model 1895 rifle, which were modified from 8 mm to 7.92 mm.


I can't seem to find anything about the conversion of Romanian m95s to the 7.92mm round. Does anyone know when or where this conversion took place, and what other changes might have been made?

worldwar2.ro shows a picture of the Austrian 8mm long rifle in the small arms section. It seems to be a thumbnail of the weapon featured here:

http://randyrick.us/AustrianFirearms/rm1895.htm

Is this the exact weapon issued to the Romanian army in world war 2?


Tons of questions! ohmy.gif Any information would be super helpful, so thanks in advance!

pictures would be even better! biggrin.gif
PMEmail Poster
Top
mihnea
Posted: May 31, 2007 10:08 pm
Quote Post


Capitan
*

Group: Members
Posts: 682
Member No.: 679
Joined: September 26, 2005



I doubt these conversions ever existed, it's not easy to modify the caliber from 8x50r to 7,92x57 on a mannlicher m95, the barrel needs to be changed, also the bolt head, extractor and magazine need modifications. If you are interested in the modifications take a look at the Yugoslav M95m they done just that.

In the inter war era the main Romanian rifle was the French Berthier not the Mannlicher M95 not the Mannlicher M93 or the Mosin Nagant 91. The Berthier was replaced in the late '30's with Vz-24 and the Berthier was taken out of service being the worst design (but in the biggest number) of the four WWI veterans so the other three rifles were in small quantities, not enough to modify them efficiently, also modifying the MN 91 would have been a lot simpler.
PMEmail Poster
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0089 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]