Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (2) 1 [2] ( Go to first unread post ) |
Dénes |
Posted: October 19, 2003 07:45 pm
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
"Laid down" could have several meanings. One is - how can I say it neutrally? - "copulation" :oops: Are you familiar with the poems of Jim Morrison from "The Doors"? There the topic is reoccurring. Dénes |
||
Victor |
Posted: October 19, 2003 07:53 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
I really doubt Jim Morrison was thinking at submarines when using the "laid" term. Maybe torpedoes?
|
Dénes |
Posted: October 19, 2003 08:27 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
One never knows. "Submarine" could have several meanings, too...
Dénes |
Andreas von Mach |
Posted: October 19, 2003 09:02 pm
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 138 Member No.: 84 Joined: August 19, 2003 |
Laid Down
Launching etc are not important terms in live of one ships. They are very important for shipyard, as they are usually one of two most important , that aftre them shipyard received parts of payment. On this way they are cleary defined as these should be some responsible persons on the side of the purchasers, who accepted the terms. Even when the ships was built for the Romanian Navy at Navy Shipyard, and they both belongs to Marine Ministerium. |
Tiornu |
Posted: October 19, 2003 09:44 pm
|
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 83 Member No.: 75 Joined: August 08, 2003 |
I must admit, I was never much of a fan of The Doors or of Jim Morrison. However, there are many shades of meaning to the term "laid down" that do not involve an exchange of bodily fluids. It is supposed to denote the very beginning of construction, when assembled materials are first joined together. Sometimes there would be a ceremony involved, hardly as grand as a launching.
Launching would seem to be the event least liable to confusion, but it seems there was some "wiggle room" in this concept as well. Sometimes the date of completion was made equal to the date of commissioning. Or it might be the date when the ship was handed over for trials, or the date when trials were completed, or...whatever. Each navy had its own definition, and that definition could change over time. |
Andreas von Mach |
Posted: October 20, 2003 12:28 am
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 138 Member No.: 84 Joined: August 19, 2003 |
It it always a problem of money :!: :!: :!:
|
Andreas von Mach |
Posted: October 23, 2003 11:29 pm
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 138 Member No.: 84 Joined: August 19, 2003 |
Soviet submarine:
TS-2 ex MARSUINUL sunk 29 Feb 1945 at Poti due to torpedo explosion 28 Feb 1945 refloated and put again into service. |
Tiornu |
Posted: October 24, 2003 12:43 am
|
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 83 Member No.: 75 Joined: August 08, 2003 |
That's interesting. Does anyone have any further details?
|
Wings_of_wrath |
Posted: February 18, 2007 04:23 pm
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 136 Member No.: 809 Joined: February 04, 2006 |
By the way, on the WW2 website, the picture displayed in the profile of the NMS Marsuinul in in fact that of German U-boat U-26, of the Type I A.
For comparison, here is the picture from the site and a model of the U-25, the only other boat in the class: (second picture is from here) |
Pages: (2) 1 [2] |