Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (39) « First ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... Last »  ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Suvorov books, ww-2
dragos
Posted: March 11, 2010 02:37 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 2397
Member No.: 2
Joined: February 11, 2003



The vehicles were needed from the preparation phase, not at some point after the offensive has started.

MMM, you missed the fact that Red Army was facing a more organized force than vice-versa. As for the distances, you make it sound like you are playing too much video games.

I'll reformulate: with what would the Soviets sustain an offensive of 100+ divisions on a several hundred kilometers front in summer 1941? Please stop giving Nomonhan as an example.

The Germans had allocated for operation Barbarossa a total of 577,120 motor vehicles while the entire Red Army had a total of 272,600 trucks in June 1941.

http://books.google.ro/books?id=dcAgT_2uiY...%201941&f=false

This post has been edited by dragos on March 11, 2010 03:18 pm
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
MMM
  Posted: March 11, 2010 04:16 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1463
Member No.: 2323
Joined: December 02, 2008



Well, if things went as Suvorov says Stalin wanted (!!!!), there wouldn't even have been the time and need for a lend-lease act! tongue.gif
PS: @Dragos: let's not fall into what Suvorov describes as a trap (correctly, IMO) and compare all German motorized vehicles with the Soviet trucks!

This post has been edited by MMM on March 11, 2010 04:19 pm


--------------------
M
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
dragos
Posted: March 11, 2010 05:24 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 2397
Member No.: 2
Joined: February 11, 2003



QUOTE (MMM @ March 11, 2010 06:16 pm)
Well, if things went as Suvorov says Stalin wanted (!!!!), there wouldn't even have been the time and need for a lend-lease act! tongue.gif

This was not going to happen in a real world. Not at least in the world of 1941.

QUOTE
PS: @Dragos: let's not fall into what Suvorov describes as a trap (correctly, IMO) and compare all German motorized vehicles with the Soviet trucks!


The German figure for vehicles is not exclusively trucks, but does not include armored cars, half-tracks or motorcycles. Nevertheless, the point is the German had more trucks for Barbarossa than Soviets had for their entire army at that moment. And it was still an insufficient number for the German plan of operations!


PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
MMM
Posted: March 11, 2010 05:28 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1463
Member No.: 2323
Joined: December 02, 2008



Of course, but the German plan of operation was for a surface of... what? How much had they to go in REAL terms, in the terms of the tanks' guaranteed distance?


--------------------
M
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
dead-cat
Posted: March 11, 2010 05:54 pm
Quote Post


Locotenent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 559
Member No.: 99
Joined: September 05, 2003



at the beginning of 1940 the Wehrmacht operated about 120.000 trucks with a capacity greater than 1.5t.
the yearly production during '40-44 averaged between 70.000 and 80.000 with 80% going to the army. which puts the car park of the Wehrmacht in term of trucks in mid '41 at about 215.000 trucks.
that would be less than the RA had.
figures from "Kraftfahrzeuge und Panzer der Reichswehr, Wehrmacht und Bundeswehr", 2003.

it is unclear however, if the figure is wheeled trucks only or if it includes half-track artillery tractors.
PMYahoo
Top
dragos
Posted: March 11, 2010 06:02 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 2397
Member No.: 2
Joined: February 11, 2003



The trucks captured from France and other occupied territories in 1940 would add up to this number to a considerable amount.
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
dead-cat
Posted: March 11, 2010 06:37 pm
Quote Post


Locotenent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 559
Member No.: 99
Joined: September 05, 2003



can't find anything authoritative on french booty trucks used in the german army, but they'd hat to be at least 60.000, if of the german army truck park of 1940 to match the RA.

This post has been edited by dead-cat on March 11, 2010 06:37 pm
PMYahoo
Top
dragos
Posted: March 11, 2010 09:19 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 2397
Member No.: 2
Joined: February 11, 2003



From "Trucks of the Wehrmacht" by Reinhard Frank:

QUOTE

The German troops captured many thousands of trucks from various countries, especially while they were on the advance. Unfortunately, statistics are not available - for one thing, because the records of the collecting places are no longer available, and for another, because many units never officially reported their "well-earned booty". During the war, the motor vehicle factories of the occupied countries produced goodly quantities of trucks for the Wehrmacht. Definite production figures of these firms are unnecessarily keep under lock and key to this day.

According to the war diary of Generaloberst Halder (Chief of the Army General Staff), the tense situation of the German motor vehicle industry made it necessary that, in the reorganization and establishment of "fast units" (Schnellen Verbanden) in April 1941, almost exlusively French material had to be used - and in the 20th P.D. as well as the 14th, 18th and 36th I.D.(mot.).

Without the many foreign vehicles, the large-scale German operations in World War II surely would have been impossible.




PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
ANDREAS
Posted: March 11, 2010 10:43 pm
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Member No.: 2421
Joined: March 15, 2009



QUOTE
Both the Pz II and the Skoda LT-35 (btw it had superior armor to the T-26 or the BT) were equipped with radios. This alone renders them superior from operational point of view to the Soviet models mentioned. Take into consideration the fact that none of the four was invulnerable to the guns of the others.

Agree with you Victor, in terms of of capacity of all these tanks to destroy each other, on normal engagement ranges. As I checked the soviet 45mm/L46 tank gun could penetrate 35mm steel armor at 1000m, and the czech 37mm Skoda 37mm A3 L/40 vz.34 or P.U.V. vz.37. L/47.8 could penetrate 23-24mm steel armor at 1000m, or 25-27mm steel armor at 1000m with APC projectiles. Source: Jentz, Thomas L: Panzer Truppen Vol 1.
It was indeed enough for both sides to destroy each other at large distances, the advantage in the armor protection of czech production tanks was useless... and agree with the fact that radios and communication was very important and a real advantage for the german crews! But what about reliability of all these tank types? Than what about cross-country capacity? My point is -the Skoda tanks were a real challenge for their crews -not only romanian ones...
PMEmail PosterYahoo
Top
MMM
Posted: March 12, 2010 07:52 am
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1463
Member No.: 2323
Joined: December 02, 2008



QUOTE
Without the many foreign vehicles, the large-scale German operations in World War II surely would have been impossible.

So, the Wehrmacht had its own version of "lend-lease act" wink.gif


--------------------
M
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
osutacincizecisidoi
Posted: March 12, 2010 08:54 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 72
Member No.: 1505
Joined: July 10, 2007



B]@Victor [/B]

That comparison is yours not mine, besides the 12th army and jukov 57th corps are similar in terms of men and equipment. Needles to say, it faced the Romanian third army not the german Heer.

During june and july the soviets raised the following divisions :

114,118,127,129,132,134,151,160,162,187,194,196,198,212,214,217,220,226,227,
230,232,234,238,239,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,250,251,252,253,254,256,257,
,258,259,260,261,262,264,266,268,269,270,271,272,279,280,281,282,284,285,286,
287,288,289,292,293,297,299,300,302,303,305,307,309,310,311,312,313,314,316,322,413,415.

I ask a simple question : From were did the officers and NCO came ?

This post has been edited by osutacincizecisidoi on March 12, 2010 08:59 am
PMEmail Poster
Top
osutacincizecisidoi
Posted: March 12, 2010 11:20 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 72
Member No.: 1505
Joined: July 10, 2007



PMEmail Poster
Top
MMM
Posted: March 12, 2010 02:20 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1463
Member No.: 2323
Joined: December 02, 2008



QUOTE (dragos @ March 11, 2010 02:37 pm)
As for the distances, you make it sound like you are playing too much video games.

The idea - which I still stand for also in august 1944 - is that Ploiesti was within striking distance from the airfields of the newly-acquired Bessarabia; not to mention that, as was seen in 1942 (Caucasus), one cannot really exploit oil from the frontline.
So, videogames or not (I actually used to play strategy games wink.gif ), the distance from the fronteer to Ploiest's refineries was small; if the Soviets would have had pieces of artillery comparable with what Germans had at Sevastopol - that would have brought Astra Română within striking distance - but that's a mere speculation NOW, after the facts. Hitler, however, was extremely cautious when considering this issue.


--------------------
M
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Victor
Posted: March 13, 2010 03:13 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



QUOTE (osutacincizecisidoi @ March 12, 2010 10:54 am)
B]@Victor [/B]

That comparison is yours not mine, besides the 12th army and jukov 57th corps are similar in terms of men and equipment. Needles to say, it faced the Romanian third army not the german Heer.

During june and july the soviets raised the following divisions :

114,118,127,129,132,134,151,160,162,187,194,196,198,212,214,217,220,226,227,
230,232,234,238,239,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,250,251,252,253,254,256,257,
,258,259,260,261,262,264,266,268,269,270,271,272,279,280,281,282,284,285,286,
287,288,289,292,293,297,299,300,302,303,305,307,309,310,311,312,313,314,316,322,413,415.

I ask a simple question : From were did the officers and NCO came ?

If that was not meant as a comparison, then please explain what is the purpose of that particular piece of information and its relation to the current topic. The 3rd Romanian Army was not defending the entire Eastern Front. Needless to say, had the Soviets invaded in July 1941, then they would face in most places the German Heer and Luftwaffe, not the Romanian 3rd Army.

Getting back to the situation of the 3rd Army, it is an interesting what if. One thing is sure though: the 11th German Army and the Luftwaffe Air Corps were a good bolster to the Romanian troops.

Going to the divisions raised by the Soviets in the summer of 1941, I will reply with another question: what makes you think these were anything else than cannon fodder?

I will again quote Glantz (When Titans clashed page 68)

QUOTE
For all their shortcommings, the divisions lost in the first weeks of battle were far better trained and equipped than their successors. The latter units lacked almost everything except rifles and political officers. Perhaps more important they had little time to train as units, topractice procedures so that soldiers and subordinate units knew their roles in combat.


The Red Army's force generation saved the Soviet Union from collapse in 1941, but with the sacrifice of millions of soldiers that went into battle without a real chance of survival. However, it is mistaken to think that these units carried any potential in the advent of a Soviet offenssive.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Victor
Posted: March 13, 2010 03:15 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



QUOTE (MMM @ March 12, 2010 04:20 pm)
if the Soviets would have had pieces of artillery comparable with what Germans had at Sevastopol - that would have brought Astra Română within striking distance - but that's a mere speculation NOW, after the facts. Hitler, however, was extremely cautious when considering this issue.

They didn't. The Germans were the only ones to develop such ressource consuming weapons. The others were more practical.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (39) « First ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... Last » Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0125 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]