Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (2) 1 [2]   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Romanian StuG40 photos ?
nox
Posted: January 20, 2006 09:06 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 92
Member No.: 642
Joined: August 07, 2005



stug come from http://www.profils.tk
photo evidence concord 7046
user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
Cantacuzino
Posted: January 20, 2006 11:07 am
Quote Post


Host
Group Icon

Group: Hosts
Posts: 2328
Member No.: 144
Joined: November 17, 2003



QUOTE
stug come from http://www.profils.tk
photo evidence concord 7046


Hi nox,

Do you know if the emblem (from the picture) used on this Stug is from a german unit ?

I would like to add this to the color profile.


user posted image


PM
Top
nox
Posted: January 25, 2006 07:32 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 92
Member No.: 642
Joined: August 07, 2005



from ebay biggrin.gif
Stug 3 from Sturmgeschützbrigade 191 smile.gif
The picture was taken the 23.05.1943 during a visit of a Rumanian officer.
Perhaps a demonstration in prevision of the delivery. ohmy.gif
user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
Victor
Posted: January 25, 2006 08:40 am
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



This was happening in Crimea in May 1943. The StuG was German, not Romanian and very likely it was not a demostration prior to delivery.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
nox
Posted: January 25, 2006 09:07 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 92
Member No.: 642
Joined: August 07, 2005



I said "perhaps" biggrin.gif for demonstration
I knew this stug wasn't rumanian
mad.gif "Stug 3 from Sturmgeschützbrigade 191" german unit!!!! mad.gif
The first deliveries were held in november 1943, 5-6 months after the picture rolleyes.gif
PMEmail Poster
Top
MaxFax
Posted: February 07, 2006 05:23 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Members
Posts: 255
Member No.: 7
Joined: June 18, 2003



QUOTE (sid guttridge @ May 28 2005, 01:14 PM)
Hi Guys,

The second photo, with a number "4" at the top left, showing Romanian infantry on a StuG.III, is actually of a German vehicle.

I have seen it in an old Squadron/Signal book on the StuG.III. In that publication one can see more clearly that the central figure standing in a hatch (presumably the vehicle commander) is German.

Cheers,

Sid.

Indeed, the photo is taken from "Panzerjaeger in action" 1973 Squadron?Signal Pub. armor number 7, page 34.
Here is a better copy of this photo ....

user posted image
PM
Top
romrail
Posted: March 19, 2006 10:37 pm
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 64
Member No.: 852
Joined: March 19, 2006



Because I'm new on this forum I want to saluta all its membres.

Here's a picture with a Stug 40 and some romanian soldiers. Sadly the picture offers no clues about where and when it was made. The person who gave it to me said that it appears to be made in the suumer of 1944, in near Roman (in Moldavia).

user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
MaxFax
  Posted: March 20, 2006 03:44 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Members
Posts: 255
Member No.: 7
Joined: June 18, 2003



Great photo romrail !!

Could you take a closer look and tell us if there is Zimmerit on this Stug ?! unsure.gif
PM
Top
romrail
Posted: March 20, 2006 06:29 pm
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 64
Member No.: 852
Joined: March 19, 2006



Yes the vehicle has Zimmerit coating. I find this rather puzzling because I'm not sure if romanian vehicles where coated with Zimmerit. The vehicle can also be actually from a german unit and only given to the romanians.

This post has been edited by romrail on March 20, 2006 06:29 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
mihnea
Posted: March 20, 2006 07:24 pm
Quote Post


Capitan
*

Group: Members
Posts: 682
Member No.: 679
Joined: September 26, 2005



The vehicle wasn’t built specially for the Romanian army; it was built to German army specifications and captured by the Romanian army.

Also many captured vehicles weren't even repainted just the markings were changed and then used in action.
PMEmail Poster
Top
MaxFax
Posted: March 20, 2006 07:52 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Members
Posts: 255
Member No.: 7
Joined: June 18, 2003



QUOTE (mihnea @ Mar 20 2006, 09:24 PM)
The vehicle wasn’t built specially for the Romanian army; it was built to German army specifications and captured by the Romanian army.

Also many captured vehicles weren't even repainted just the markings were changed and then used in action.

Let's don't forget that : " Between November 1943 and August 1944 Germany delivered 108 Sturmgeschütz III Ausf G that were distributed to the 1st Armoured Division, the 8th Motorised Cavalry Division and the Armoured Detachment of the 4th Army"
We can't know for sure if the Stug from the picture is a captured one, or a loaned one, or if it's "a Romanian" one .... unsure.gif
PM
Top
mihnea
Posted: March 20, 2006 09:25 pm
Quote Post


Capitan
*

Group: Members
Posts: 682
Member No.: 679
Joined: September 26, 2005



I know but the vehicles recived were "standard" without any modifications or improvements as it was the case with the prewar armor bought from the Czech.

And some of the 108 Stug III given by the Germans were used vehicles, also the lack of a special designation proves that they were without any modifications.

Probably some had Zimmerit and others hadn’t, being different models. All vehicles made between September 1943 and September 1944 had Zimmerit applied also the vehicle from the picture has the cast gun mantle (Topfblende) so it is made after November 1943.

I doubt that the picture was taken in Moldavia because the vehicle has no markings, it's missing the Schurzen and it looks banged up.
PMEmail Poster
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (2) 1 [2]  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0105 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]