Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (62) « First ... 60 61 [62] ( Go to first unread post ) |
Iamandi |
Posted: February 07, 2005 09:45 am
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1386 Member No.: 319 Joined: August 04, 2004 |
Breaking news
Iraqi Air Force Receives Helicopters Source: US Central Command "TAJI, Iraq --- Iraqi air force officials welcomed the arrival of two UH-1H Huey helicopters Feb. 1 to Taji Air Base. The completely refurbished helicopters will provide airlift support and important troop-moving capabilities for the growing Iraqi air force command. A gift from Jordan, this is the first in a series of scheduled deliveries to occur during the next 12 months. A total of 16 UH-1H aircraft are slated to arrive in Iraq by February 2006. The Iraqi flag is displayed on the fuselage of both aircraft. According to Wing Commander Rad Greene, Royal Air Force, “It is an exciting time for the Iraqi air force as they re-enter the world of rotary wing aviation.” Iraqi air force officials are genuinely excited about the prospect of operating these new aircraft, Greene said. The first eight aircraft will comprise Squadron 2 and the second eight aircraft will become Squadron 4, both based at Taji. Currently, 14 Iraqi pilots are fully trained and awaiting additional flight instruction from their U.S. advisory support team (AST) pilots. Flight training will continue for the next several months until all 48 Iraqi pilots are certified. In the meantime, maintenance training will commence for the engineers and ground crews. " Iama |
Chandernagore |
Posted: February 07, 2005 10:16 am
|
Locotenent colonel Group: Banned Posts: 818 Member No.: 106 Joined: September 22, 2003 |
Hueys, wow, the junkyard from Vietnam
|
Iamandi |
Posted: February 07, 2005 10:18 am
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1386 Member No.: 319 Joined: August 04, 2004 |
Yeah, Huey for Irak, and maybe F - 16 for Romania! Thanks Uncle Sam! Iama |
Chandernagore |
Posted: February 07, 2005 10:25 am
|
Locotenent colonel Group: Banned Posts: 818 Member No.: 106 Joined: September 22, 2003 |
Inquisition – Same old methods, same old results
Mr. Rasul was one of three young men, all friends, from the British town of Tipton who were among thousands of people seized in Afghanistan in the aftermath of Sept. 11, 2001. They had been there, he said, to distribute food and medical supplies to impoverished Afghans. … Under extreme duress at Guantánamo, including hundreds of hours of interrogation and long periods of isolation, the three men confessed to having been in a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan. They also said they were among a number of men who could be seen in a videotape of Osama bin Laden. The tape had been made in August 2000. For the better part of two years, Mr. Rasul and his friends, Asif Iqbal and Rhuhel Ahmed, had denied involvement in any terror activity whatsoever. But Mr. Rasul said they eventually succumbed to long months of physical and psychological abuse. The three men, all British citizens, were saved by British intelligence officials, who proved that they had been in England when the video was shot, and during the time they were supposed to have been in Al Qaeda training camps. All three were returned to England, where they were released from custody. Bob Herbert - New York Times Full article The reliability of any information obtained by using torture can again be witnessed in all it's splendor. However, I have no doubt that Valachus will explain to us how torturing people for the crime of humanitarian aid helped save American innocents from terrorist attack. Moreover it was enjoyable. This post has been edited by Chandernagore on February 07, 2005 10:29 am |
valachus |
Posted: February 07, 2005 10:33 am
|
||
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 79 Member No.: 125 Joined: October 20, 2003 |
"US innocents" LOL yess, I musst be an eevil american neo-con (and a Jew too, perhaps?), for it iz absurd zat ze splendid propaganda machinery of ze European Union has malfunctioned when brainwashing me! For zis is impossible! And, in case you wonder, yes, I had to take cosmetic surgery in order to repair the forked tongue I was born with. It was just a tad too obvious. However, may I remind you and the others reading this that so far dozens of Romanians have been killed in terrorist attacks in the last 5 years or so, in Israel, at WTC and Madrid? Dozens of others were crippled for life. Kids were left orphan, and why? What was the reason for their death? They were honest, hard-working people who hadn't harmed or threatened the lives of anyone, ever. They were however targeted and killed just for being at hand, along with thousands others. "The more, the merrier" goes the saying that could easily be taken as a motto by muslim terrorists. Could at least a part of those deaths been prevented? Of course it could. The first thing that pops into my mind is the laxity of the Spanish intelligence and police, prior to 3/11, in the context of explicit al-qaida threats. But hey, Chandernagore and others, many many others, could and would have taken offence and would have protested an aggressive pursuit of islamic terrorism in Europe. "We are your friends, we come in peace and we protest American interventions in Afganistan and Iraq! So pliiiiiz don't bomb us, OK?" Thus, Abu-Ghraib was a stupid, pointless display of low-level prison guards acting out their sick sexual obsessions. And they were put behind bars for long years and with good reason. This aspect somehow evades the minds of "progressive-thinking" people, who seem to believe that a) pulling panties over prisoners' heads was ordered by The Great Satanic Leader Bush himself, and while those prison guards deserved to have been stoned to death or killed by some other really painful manner (unlike their prisoners, of course), they were in fact cleared of any charge. However, below is a list of some of the people who in my book were more than worthy of some medieval questioning, if taken alive and reluctant to cooperate fully with the intelligence officers. And if anyone knows of videotapes or DVDs with the respective investigative sessions on sale, please notify me! Name: Yasser al-Sirri Function: al-Qaeda spokesman Status: Arrested in the UK in October 2001 Name: Rifa Ahmed Taha Function: Gamaa al-Islamiyyah leader, al-Qaeda third-in-command Status: Unconfirmed reports state that he was arrested in Damascus in October 2001 and extradicted to Egypt, where he was summarily executed by the Egyptian authorities Name: Juma Namangani Function: Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan leader; top commander of Taliban forces at Taloqan Status: Dead as a result of injuries sustained during the Battle of Mazar-e-Sharif in November 2001 Name: Mohammed Atef Function: al-Qaeda military chief Status: Killed a US airstrike in Afghanistan in November 2001 Name: Imad Yarkas Function: European operations chief Status: Arrested by Spanish authorities in November 2001 Name: Ali Saleh al-Marri Function: US operations chief Status: Arrested by US authorities in December 2001 Name:Ibn al-Sheikh al-Libi Function: Head of al-Qaeda training infrastructure in Afghanistan; Khalden camp commander Status: Captured while attempting to flee across the Pakistani border in December 2001 Name: Mohammed Salah Function: al-Qaeda facilitator Status: Killed in a US airstrike in December 2001 Name: Tariq Anwar al-Sayyid Ahmad Function: senior Egyptian Islamic Jihad leader Status: Killed in a US airstrike in February 2002 Name: Abu Jafar al-Jaziri Function: senior aide to Abu Zubaydah Status: Killed in a US airstrike in February 2002 Name: Antar Zouabri Function: GIA leader Status: Killed by Algerian security forces in February 2002 Name: Omar ibn al-Khattab Function: Islamic International Brigade leader Status: Assassinated through a poisoned letter in March 2002 Name: Abu Zubaydah Function: Global operations chief Status: Captured in Pakistan in March 2002 Name: Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi Function: Al-Qaeda training camp commander Status: Captured by US forces in April 2002 Name: Abu Zubair al-Haili Function: Senior al-Qaeda recruiter Status: Captured in Morocco in June 2002 Name: Omar Farouk Function: Top al-Qaeda representative to Jemaah Islamiyyah Status: Captured in June 2002 in Malaysia Name: Abu Sabaya Function: Abu Sayyaf spokesman Status: Killed by US-backed Filippino troops in June 2002 Name: Ramzi Binalshibh Function: Hamburg cell leader; member of the military committee after 9/11 Status: Captured in Pakistan in September 2002 Name: Wan Min Wan Mat Function: KMM/JI financier Status: Arrested by Malaysian authorities in September 2002 Name: Saif al-Islam al-Masri Function: al-Qaeda ruling council member Status: Captured by US-backed Georgian forces in October 2002 Name: Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri Function: Top al-Qaeda naval commander; Persian Gulf operations chief Status: Captured in the UAE in October 2002 Name: Abu Qatadah Function: Al-Qaeda spiritual leader in Europe Status: Arrested in the UK in October 2002 Name: Qaed Sinan al-Harethi Function: Red Sea operations chief Status: Killed by a US Predator drone in November 2002 Name: Imam Samudra Function: Bali bombing mastermind Status: Arrested by Indonesian authorities in November 2002 Name: Ali Gufron Function: JI senior leader Status: Arrested by Indonesian authorities in December 2002 Name: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Function: 9/11 mastermind, head of the military committee upon the death of Atef Status: Captured in Pakistan in March 2003 Name: Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi Function: al-Qaeda treasurer; 9/11 paymaster Status: Captured in Pakistan in March 2003 Name: Mohammed Omar Abdel Rahman Function: al-Qaeda military commander Status: Captured in Pakistan in March 2003 Name: Yasser al-Jaziri Function: al-Qaeda financier Status: Captured in Pakistan in March 2003 Name: Christian Ganczarski Function: Djerba synagogue bombing mastermind Status: Arrested by Saudi authorities in April 2003 Name: Abu Taisir Function: Al-Qaeda WMD expert Status: Killed by US cruise missile attack in northern Iraq in April 2003 Name: Tawfiq Attash Khallad Function: South Asia operations chief Status: Captured in Pakistan in April 2003 Name: Ammar al-Baluchi Function: Pakistan operations chief Status: Captured in Pakistan in April 2003 Name: Abu Rusdan Function: JI ideologue Status: Arrested by Indonesian authorities in April 2003 Name: Safwan ul-Hasham Function: communications expert Status: Captured in Pakistan in May 2003 Name: Saifullah Yunos Function: JI explosives and WMD expert Status: Arrested by Filippino authorities in May 2003 Name: Khalid Jehani Function: Saudi Arabia operations chief Status: Served as one of the suicide bombers in the first Riyadh bombings in May 2003 Name: Karim Mehdi Function: al-Qaeda facilitator Status: Arrested by French authorities in June 2003 Name: Yousef al-Ayyeri Function: al-Qaeda ideologue Status: Killed in a gunfight with Saudi authorities in June 2003 Name: Ali al-Farqasi al-Ghamdi Function: Saudi Arabia operations chief Status: Surrendered to Saudi authorities in July 2003 Name: Hambali Function: Southeast Asia operations chief; Jemaah Islamiyyah operations chief Status: Captured in Thailand in August 2003 Name: Zubayr al-Rimi Function: Al-Qaeda commando leader Status: Killed in Saudi Arabia in September 2003 Name: Abu Mohammed Function: Islamic Movement of East Turkestan (IMET) leader Status: Killed in Pakistan in October 2003 Name: Ahmed Said al-Khadr Function: al-Qaeda financier and ruling council member Status: Killed in Pakistan in October 2003 Name: Tawfiq Rifqi Function: JI Philippines leader Status: Captured by Filippino police in October 2003 Name: Fathur Rehman al-Ghozi Function: JI explosives expert Status: Killed by Filippino troops in October 2003 Name: Aso Hawleri Function: Ansar al-Islam military commander Status: Captured by US forces in Iraq in October 2003 Name: Abderrazak al-Mahdjoub Function: European recruiting chief Status: Arrested by German authorities in November 2003 Name: Hassan Ghul Function: al-Qaeda liaison to al-Tawhid Status: Captured by Kurdish peshmerga in northern Iraq in January 2004 Name: Ruslan Gelayev Function: Special Purpose Islamic Regiment leader Status: Dead as a result of wounds suffered during a battle with Russian forces in Dagestan in January 2004 Name: Abu Mohammed Hamza Function: al-Tawhid explosives expert Status: Killed by US troops in Fallujah in February 2004 Name: Khalid Ali al-Hajj Function: Saudi Arabia operations chief Status: Killed in Saudi Arabia in March 2004 Name: Jamal Zougam Function: 3/11 mastermind Status: Arrested by Spanish authorities in March 2004 Name: Sarhane bin Abdel-Majid Fakhet Function: Spain operations chief Status: Committed suicide rather than be taken prisoner in April 2004 Name: Abd al-Aziz al-Muqrin Function: Saudi Arabia operations chief Status: Killed in Saudi Arabia in June 2004 Name: Musabir Aruchi Function: Pakistan operations chief Status: Captured in Pakistan in June 2004 Name: Rabei Osman Ahmed Function: European operations chief Status: Arrested by Italian authorities in June 2004 Name: Nabil Sahraoui Function: GSPC leader Status: Killed by Algerian security forces in June 2004 Name: Mohammed Naeem Noor Khan Function: communications chief Status: Captured in Pakistan in July 2004 Name: Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani Function: al-Qaeda facilitator Status: Captured in Pakistan in July 2004 Name: Qari Saifullah Akhtar Function: Harakat ul-Jihad-e-Islami leader Status: Captured in the UAE in August 2004 Name: Fazlur Rehman Khalil Function: Harakat ul-Mujahideen leader Status: Captured in Pakistan in August 2004 Name: Mustaqim Function: JI military commander Status: Arrested by Indonesian authorities in August 2004 Name: Habib Aktas Function: Turkey operations chief Status: Killed in a US airstrike in Iraq in September 2004 |
||
Chandernagore |
Posted: February 07, 2005 10:48 am
|
||||
Locotenent colonel Group: Banned Posts: 818 Member No.: 106 Joined: September 22, 2003 |
Oh, make up your mind Valachus. Was it a usefull mistake, a worthless policy or do you simply enjoy it ? |
||||
valachus |
Posted: February 07, 2005 10:53 am
|
||||
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 79 Member No.: 125 Joined: October 20, 2003 |
This touching story got to me inner feelings mate. I even shed a tear, you know. However I came back to my usually sadic self when I read these: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1786401.stm http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/stor...40612%2C00.html
Sooo, mr attorney for the defense, these bums who had no money for a computer training course in the UK or enough clout to get a wife there and had to go shopping for one back in Pakistan (and simultaneously, after the WTC attacks, may I remind you - how about that for a coincidence? gobsmacking stuff there) were in fact filantropists with a penchant for aiding taleban women in distress. And were so discreet about it that even their families had no idea. Regular Batman and Robin stuff there. Touchy story, mate. Too bad it's so darn idiotic. This post has been edited by valachus on February 07, 2005 10:59 am |
||||
Chandernagore |
Posted: February 07, 2005 11:19 am
|
Locotenent colonel Group: Banned Posts: 818 Member No.: 106 Joined: September 22, 2003 |
Yes, Valachus. You don't need laws. You don't need stinking attorneys. You don't need proves. You don't shed tears. And torture rates very high on your morale value scale, which is lower than the water level in the toilet. That's the way of thugs throughout history.
Would you mind explaining how is Irak linked to 9/11 ? Let's laugh a bit to flush away the pestilence of your ideas. |
Chandernagore |
Posted: February 07, 2005 11:54 am
|
Locotenent colonel Group: Banned Posts: 818 Member No.: 106 Joined: September 22, 2003 |
The road to Islamic republic....
Hojatul Islam Ali Abdulhakim Alsafi, the second most senior cleric of Iraq, in a letter to President George W Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair, has adopted a threatening tone by stating that their refusal to let the Iraqis chose their own institutions would drag their countries into a battle they would lose. Needless to say, Alsafi was saying what Sistani wasn't saying directly and explicitly, but really meant to say. Ehsan Ahrari - Asia Times "Mission accomplished ! " This post has been edited by Chandernagore on February 07, 2005 11:57 am |
Iamandi |
Posted: February 07, 2005 01:21 pm
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1386 Member No.: 319 Joined: August 04, 2004 |
Streets of Iraq are unsure... But, with an RPG, can you shot down a C-130? We will see this, in future...
Plan Reduces Risk for Truck Drivers in Iraq Source: US Air Force "SOUTHWEST ASIA --- Recently 250 additional U.S. truck drivers per week were removed from the dangerous roads of Iraq because of expanded air operations that deliver cargo directly from the United States to airfields in Iraq. This, combined with existing air operations, now removes about 1,280 convoy drivers per week from Iraqi roads. Army Brig. Gen. Mark Scheid, who is in charge of U.S. Central Command’s Distribution and Deployment Operations Center has been working hard not just to get more truck drivers off Iraqi roads, but to get convoys off the roads where the risk is the highest. “Ninety-one percent of all U.S. casualties occur in an area called the Sunni Triangle, so that is the area all logisticians were directed to turn their focus to reduce driver casualties,” General Scheid said. “Many cargo operations were flying into airfields that were located in … the most dangerous areas of Iraq,” he said. “Truck convoys would then drive outward from these airfields across the most dangerous highways in the world in order to deliver supplies to the military forces. There had to be a smarter way to get supplies to our forces.” Air Force officials increased the number of aircraft available to mitigate convoy operations, but, until now, the focus was not in the areas where truck drivers were facing their greatest threat. Today, strategic airlift delivers cargo directly to several airfields capable of handling the large aircraft, officials said. A hub-and-spoke system has been established to re-fly cargo to smaller airstrips where C-130 Hercules aircraft can land, but more importantly, to locations where the largest concentration of military forces are assigned. These initiatives have not eliminated all trucks on the roads within the Sunni Triangle, but air support has certainly mitigated the threat for at least 250 more truck drivers per week that once traversed the most dangerous roads in the world, officials said. " Iama |
Iamandi |
Posted: February 07, 2005 01:27 pm
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1386 Member No.: 319 Joined: August 04, 2004 |
Military Vehicles in Iraq Get Up-Armored by Feb. 15
Source: US Department of Defense "WASHINGTON --- Insurgents will have a tougher time targeting U.S. troops riding in Humvees and other vehicles in Iraq come Feb. 15. That's when, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld told CNN interviewer Larry King Feb. 3, "there will not be a vehicle moving around in Iraq anywhere outside of a protected compound that does not have the appropriate armor." Speaking to King from the Pentagon via a video hookup, Rumsfeld noted that specialists had been flown into Iraq in recent weeks to attach shipped-in supplemental armor to various U.S. military vehicles. Rumsfeld praised U.S. military planners for adjusting to the insurgents' hit- and-run tactics, noting "there is no line of battle in an insurgency." The U.S. military in Iraq, the secretary pointed out, has "provided force protection in a country and in an insurgency where there is no forward edge of the battlefield." Rumsfeld also lauded the successful Iraqi elections held Jan. 30, noting Iraqi forces had provided security around 5,000 polling sites across the country. Ongoing efforts to train and equip Iraqi army troops and police "are well along," Rumsfeld reported. U.S. troops would stay in Iraq "as long as needed, and not one day longer," he said. Looking back, Rumsfeld praised the leadership of Army Gen. Tommy Franks, the now-retired former U.S. Central Command chief who quarterbacked the combat offensive that destroyed Saddam Hussein's military. "The major combat operation (against Saddam) lasted a very short period of time," Rumsfeld recalled. "General Franks did a superb job, and his commanders were highly successful." The secretary acknowledged that the absence of a northern front directed against Saddam's forces at the onset of hostilities in March 2003 probably contributed to the insurgency's staying power today. Turkish politicians had declined to allow U.S. troops to enter Iraq from Turkey, likely because polling had shown that the vast majority of Turks were against the idea. "One of the things that didn't go right was we were not able to get the 4th Infantry Division in from the north through Turkey," Rumsfeld recalled. As a result, he noted, the Sunni Arabs living north of Baghdad who were Saddam's strongest supporters "didn't really ever experience the full power of the United States military." Today, Sunnis angered at the passing of the deposed dictator's regime "are the ones that are fomenting this insurgency that exists in Iraq," the secretary pointed out. "The fact that we couldn't get that division in from the north was unfortunate, in my view," he said. Baghdad capitulated on April 9, 2003, but today American, coalition and Iraqi forces continue to battle an insurgency made up of disgruntled Sunnis and anti- West Islamic radicals, including al Qaeda-affiliated mercenaries. The insurgency has proven to be "more intense than had been anticipated," Rumsfeld acknowledged, but he noted he was heartened by the fortitude shown by the millions of Iraqis who voted in a democratic election regardless of insurgents' threats. After enduring decades of oppression under Saddam, the Iraqis "still had courage," Rumsfeld observed, as well as "that natural human desire to be free." The secretary also revealed that he offered his resignation to President Bush twice over the Abu Ghraib prison abuse situation. "I felt that he ought to make the decision as to whether or not I stayed on," Rumsfeld said. "And he made that decision and said he did want me to stay on. " Iama |
valachus |
Posted: February 07, 2005 01:59 pm
|
||
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 79 Member No.: 125 Joined: October 20, 2003 |
I thought you were already advised by moderators about personal attacks and trivial language. Well, when one's in dire lack of arguments I suppose insults can soothe one's ego. Or are you by any chance trying to have this topic locked again or even deleted from this forum? You wouldn't do that, would you? On topic: Iraq was not "linked" to 9/11, it was the next step in the war on international muslim terrorism targeted at the USA and the West, and the last one the UN previously allowed for (more from negligence than intentionally). Because, see, not only had Saddam Hussein become all of a sudden a religious kind of guy since 1993 onwards, but he was a religious kind of guy with all sorts of terrorist connections. Thus 2003 Iraq was the 1st most popular travel destination for, and a generous friend of, muslim terrorists in the world (the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, the Iranian Mujahideen-e-Khalq, the Turkish PKK, the Abu Nidal Organization; the WTC I attack masterminds all passed or stayed in Iraq at various moments in time; Saddam Hussein was subsidizing suicide bombers in Israel ETC ETC ad nauseam. Mr. Zarqawi also happened to come to Iraq in the period PREVIOUS to the Coalition entering there - later Al-Zarqawi claimed credit for a score of attacks on coalition forces, including the August 19 2003 bombing of U.N. headquarters in Baghdad that killed 23 civilians including the U.N.'s chief envoy to Iraq, Sergio Vieira de Mello.). About the WMD thing, now : not only did he have them, but he had used them previously, too. And the USA officials believed he had them, the UN believed he had them, the Russians believed he had them, the French believed he had them, the Germans believed he had them (hell, the Germans produced them, remember?)., etc. ad nauseam. Moreover, there is evidence aplenty that only the weapons embargo on Iraq stopped the further development of its nuclear program and of delivery means. Now, see, besides these circumstances (there are other dictatorships in the world that have WMDs and terrorist ties, although truth be told, none other had used WMDs against its own citizens in post-WW II times) there was one that was paramount in the overthrow of Saddam's regime: there were numerous UN resolutions that asked that his regime disarms fully and provides proof of that (which he had not), and that his troops stop firing upon USA and UK aircraft (which he had not). And aside from that, the oil-for-food program only served the interests of Saddam & family, and of the UN high-priests and sycophants (the days of NGOs screaming their lungs out and sending human shields to protect the Iraqi people are long gone, albeit now would be the best time to step forward for them - why is that, i wonder? I asked you before, perhaps you forgot to answer.) And what the UN hath said, thus hath been done. Now, what exactly is morally wrong there? Enlighten me, and please, no mantras or insults but only explicit arguments, OK? This post has been edited by valachus on February 07, 2005 02:03 pm |
||
Victor |
Posted: February 07, 2005 02:25 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
As there is no prospect of a calm and civilized discussion here, the topic shall be locked, permanently.
|
Pages: (62) « First ... 60 61 [62] |