Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (61) « First ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... Last »  ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> What fighter plane do you think Romania should use?
 
What fighter plane do you think Romania should use?
MIG 29 [ 19 ]  [14.84%]
F 16 [ 28 ]  [21.88%]
a new IAR design, built here [ 36 ]  [28.12%]
JAS-39 [ 59 ]  [46.09%]
Su-27 [ 17 ]  [13.28%]
Mirage 2000 [ 4 ]  [3.12%]
Total Votes: 163
Guests cannot vote 
Iamandi
Posted on January 06, 2005 06:42 am
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004




You have a source (link) for Brasilian's SU?

Thanks,

Iama
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Stephen Dabapuscu
Posted on January 06, 2005 07:03 am
Quote Post


Sergent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Member No.: 440
Joined: January 05, 2005



QUOTE (Iamandi @ Oct 20 2004, 11:12 AM)
It is off topic (sorry!), but check this links:

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2004/10/19/041.html

http://www.mosnews.com/money/2004/10/18/brazilplane.shtml

Su-35, waw! Russia don't want some BAC 1-11 ? laugh.gif


Iama

Iamandi,
These are the links that I found on the Brazilian Su-35 Flanker purchase, posted by you. So thank you, because if you had not posted then I would not know about the purchase.
PMEmail Poster
Top
tomcat1974
Posted on January 06, 2005 08:32 am
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Members
Posts: 263
Member No.: 427
Joined: December 20, 2004



Ok lets start with Lavi.
Lavi was a development of the F16. That is why US killed it. The Chinese Chengdu J-10 except canards is not a copy of the Lavi.Some parts might reseble with parts of Lavi , but there is no direct copy. If there is a plane that looks like it , then is the Eurofighter
J-10
user posted image
user posted image
Lavi
user posted image
user posted image
Check the F16 roots in it.

You are confusing Su 37 with S-37 (now called by Suhoi Su-47).
Su 37 was a Su 35 prototype with Thrust vectoring. Su 35 was a improvement of the Su27(it was called before Su27M). RuAF had only 6 prototipes for testing variopus types of avionics.

About Brazilian tender ... that would had been russian ideea , to try to sneak the Su35 in to a exchange deal. the Brazilian Fighter Contest it was postponed. No winner in that.
RuAf opted for a Su35. Well the opted for the Su27SM , which will strangelly be named by Suhoi Su35BM (they just like to mix the names smile.gif ) wich will be more like our Lancer program ,updating older Su27 airframes with new avionics and maybe engines. Hell there is a clear gap between russian Suchoi's and Chinesse ones..smile.gif The chinnes do have the better planes with modern avionics and modern weapons .

Some info's about russian Su35BM
QUOTE

Su-35BM

In December 2003, after the Su-27SM modernization program had been deemed a success, Russia announced that it would proceed with the so-called "big modernization" program. The modernized aircraft is called the Su-35BM (also T-10BM) by Sukhoi, but it is not yet known what name will be adopted by the Russian Air Force. The Su-35BM program is to be a deep modernization of existing airframes, not newly produced aircraft.

The main new feature of the aircraft is to be a new radar. It has not yet been decided whether it will be the Phazotron-NIIR N031 Sokol or the Tikhomirov NIIP Irbis. The first is actually the well-known Zhuk radar with a passively scanned phased array, while the Irbis is a version of the N011M Bars-M, also with a passively scanned phased array. In 2003 a new phased-array antenna was tested for Indian Su-30MKI aircraft, but it achieved only +/-45 degrees of horizontal field of view, instead of the planned +/-70 degrees. The remaining angle of 25 degrees was achieved mechanically via a hydraulic servo, which was an unsatisfactory solution. The Irbis is to differ from the Bars-M by having quick servos that are tightly synchronized with the radar electronics to achieve the 70 degrees of scan on either side of the fighter's axis. Sources says that NIIP's solution is preferred by the Russian Air Force, since NIIP radar sets were all proven in service. The radar is to have similar capabilities to the N011M Bars-M. The detection range of a fighter airplane (170 km) and a destroyer-sized naval target (300 km) more or less matches the N011M's performance.

The Su-35BM is also to receive a small radar in a tail "stinger" to monitor the rear hemisphere. It is to be a NIIR N012 Kopyo-DL with a passively scanned phased-array antenna with a range of about 50-70 km. The unique arrangement indicates that Russia does not plan to rely as heavily on data exchange networks to maintain situational awareness, although the Aist data-exchange system for the Air Force is under development.

The weapons set for the Su-35BM is to be the same as the Su-27SM. Among the new weapons in development is a long-range air-to-air missile with required range of 300 km. Since the range is beyond radar range, external information is required to prepare the missile for launch. Two or four such missiles are to be carried. The missile is to be developed from either the Novator KS-172 technology demonstrator or the Vympel R-37M missile, also proposed for the MiG-31. Sukhoi prefers the first solution, and one can say that it is part of Sukhoi's long-standing strategy to prompt the Air Force to "kill" the MiG-31s and replace them with the Su-27 family of aircraft.

The Su-35BM is also to receive a totally new self-protection system. It was developed by KNIRTI (Zhukov near Kaluga, Russia) and is designated the L-175M Khibiny-M. It has an integrated electronic-support-measures system of high accuracy, a separate display in the cockpit, a digital processor, and an integrated active radio-frequency jammer with pods on the wingtips. Probably in the future, the aircraft will also receive a missile-approach-warning system and a towed decoy (for example, the Lobushka). The aircraft will have RAM coatings and some internal changes to increase stealth features, such as a new windshield and canopy of slightly different shape covered with radar-absorbent material.

The modernized Su-27SM, together with the modernized Su-25SM and Su-24M, will form the core of the Russian Air Force for the next two decades, and this could lead to the complete withdrawal of MiG-29 aircraft, which are not going to be modernized. While the MiG-29SMT represents the ultimate modernization variant for this undervalued aircraft, without dividing the upgrade into phases, it could not be presently afforded by Russia. The Sukhoi approach, with "small" and "big" modernizations, was much more realistic and ultimately triumphant.


So as you see the aquisition of new figheter is a hard to digest thing. Production of one is even harder one wink.gif

Sources: http://aircraftstories.free.fr
Air Combat Information Group.
Picturs are from ACIG contributor page.Overscan's website.

This post has been edited by tomcat1974 on January 06, 2005 08:54 am
PMEmail Poster
Top
Victor
Posted on January 06, 2005 08:40 am
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



tomcat1974, please in the future mention the sites you take photos and info from.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Iamandi
Posted on January 06, 2005 09:07 am
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004



QUOTE (Stephen Dabapuscu @ Jan 6 2005, 07:03 AM)
QUOTE (Iamandi @ Oct 20 2004, 11:12 AM)
It is off topic (sorry!), but check this links:

  http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2004/10/19/041.html

http://www.mosnews.com/money/2004/10/18/brazilplane.shtml

    Su-35, waw! Russia don't want some BAC 1-11 ?  laugh.gif


      Iama

Iamandi,
These are the links that I found on the Brazilian Su-35 Flanker purchase, posted by you. So thank you, because if you had not posted then I would not know about the purchase.


Bad sectors detedted... Memory formated at 31 Dec. 2004 / 01. Ian. 2005...

Iama blink.gif
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Stephen Dabapuscu
Posted on January 07, 2005 08:30 am
Quote Post


Sergent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Member No.: 440
Joined: January 05, 2005



QUOTE (tomcat1974 @ Jan 6 2005, 08:32 AM)
Ok lets start with Lavi.
Lavi was a development of the F16. That is why US killed it. The Chinese Chengdu J-10 except canards is not a copy of the Lavi.Some parts might reseble with parts of Lavi , but there is no direct copy. If there is a plane that looks like it , then is the Eurofighter
J-10

You are confusing Su 37 with S-37 (now called by Suhoi Su-47).
Su 37 was a Su 35 prototype with Thrust vectoring. Su 35 was a improvement of the Su27(it was called before Su27M). RuAF had only 6 prototipes for testing variopus types of avionics.

About Brazilian tender ... that would had been russian ideea , to try to sneak the Su35 in to a exchange deal. the Brazilian Fighter Contest it was postponed. No winner in that.
RuAf opted for a Su35. Well the opted for the Su27SM , which will strangelly be named by Suhoi Su35BM (they just like to mix the names smile.gif ) wich will be more like our Lancer program ,updating older Su27 airframes with new avionics and maybe engines. Hell there is a clear gap between russian Suchoi's and Chinesse ones..smile.gif The chinnes do have the better planes with modern avionics and modern weapons .


Tomcat1974,

It is true that the Lavi was developed from the F-16, however the US did not kill the Lavi as you claim it did. What happened was US lifted an arms embargo, which it had placed on Isreal because of their bombing of Iraq's Nuclear reactor in 1981. That made hundreds cheap F-16's availiable to Isreal, so Isreal cancelled the Lavi in August 1987.
Also every single source that I have ever read regarding the J-10, clearly stated that the J-10 was developed form the Lavi. Do really think Isreal would pass up a chance to sell a fighter design that, Isreal is not even using?
The Brazilian and Russian orders are for "new" and not rebuilt aircraft. Also their is a Rumor in Air International that cliams that Vietnam has a requirement for between 18 and 36 "new" Su-35 in addition to the 12 Su-27SK which they already have and the 24 SU-30MKI's they have on order. I'am sure that other export customers will follow in due time. wink.gif

Thank

This post has been edited by Stephen Dabapuscu on January 07, 2005 08:35 am
PMEmail Poster
Top
Iamandi
Posted on January 09, 2005 10:26 am
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004



Raptors Cleared to Fly Again


" LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE, Va. --- Air Force officials cleared the F/A-22 Raptor to resume flight operations Jan. 6 following a comprehensive review of procedural and engineering data.

One of the aircraft crashed Dec. 20 at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., which caused a temporary halt to flying the most technologically advanced fighter in the world, officials said.

The investigation of the accident continues. However, enough information is available for Air Force officials to be highly confident in the design, testing and development of the F/A-22s. With about 7,000 flight hours already logged in the Raptor and an overwhelmingly positive safety record when compared to previous aircraft development programs, officials said they determined that flight operations can be safely resumed.

No one was injured in the Dec. 20 accident that destroyed the aircraft."



B-1s Return to Flight

"LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE, Va. --- The B-1B Lancer fleet returned to flight status Jan. 5 following a six-day grounding.

Air Combat Command leaders halted flight operations for B-1Bs on Dec. 30 because of a possible nose landing gear problem.

Concerns leading to the flight suspension have been addressed, command officials said. "

Both extracted from US Airf Force releases

Iama

PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Victor
Posted on January 09, 2005 10:43 am
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



Iamandi please stick to the topic.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Iamandi
Posted on January 24, 2005 02:24 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004




Any official or half official news about this subject? Because... , for example others are not sleeping:

Gripen Training Starts


Source: FMV Swedish Defence Procurement Agency


"The first Hungarian pilots have arrived in Sweden to start their Gripen conversion training

The first five Hungarian pilots, who will undergo conversion training to Gripen has arrived in Sweden today. For the next year, they will be based at the Swedish Air Force F 7 Wing at Satenas, the Swedish training center for Gripen.

The Commander of the Skaraborg Wing, Colonel Fredrik Hedén said, “I am delighted to welcome our Hungarian Air Force friends to F 7 Satenas. I very much look forward to working closely with these pilots during their stay here and also building a strong and lasting relationship for future Swedish Air Force and Hungarian Air Force co-operation”.

During their period of training, these pilots will be trained to an instructor level and undertake theoretical training, simulator training and flight training. After their year in Sweden they will return to Hungary and work as Gripen instructor pilots in the Hungarian Air Force.

The next group of Hungarian pilots will arrive in Sweden in the summer of 2006. They will start their training in Sweden and finish it in Hungary where they will be trained by their Hungarian instructor colleges. "

Iama

PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Matt_S
Posted on January 26, 2005 08:39 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 14
Member No.: 482
Joined: January 26, 2005



It's hard for me to come up with a well-thought out answer at this time, but I hope you guys (Romania) does what's best for you, without any political BS or outside pressure.


Matt cool.gif
PMEmail Poster
Top
Iamandi
Posted on January 27, 2005 06:48 am
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004




And...

First Hungarian Gripen Ready


Source: FMV Swedish Defence Procurement Agency


"STOCKHOLM, Sweden --- At a ceremony today, Saab presented the first Hungarian Gripen to roll off the production line at its factory in Linköping, Sweden. The ceremony took place in the presence of the Hungarian Defence Minister Mr Ference Juhász and the Swedish Defence Minister Mrs Leni Bjorklund as well as representatives from the Hungarian MOD, the Hungarian Air Force, the Hungarian Ambassador to Sweden. From Sweden, FMV’s acting Director General, Saab’s Deputy CEO and the MD for Gripen International were also in attendance.

“The roll-out of the first Hungarian Gripen is a significant milestone in the Gripen for Hungary program. I am delighted that the Swedish government and Swedish industry have demonstrated their technical and program management excellence in the delivery of Gripen aircraft to the Hungarian government” says FMV Program Director Mats Hansson.

During 2005 there will be another 5 Hungarian Gripen aircraft in production. They will be completed during 2006 with the first aircraft being delivered in March 2006.

After the final assembly stage, the aircraft goes in to a period of ground test and flight testing conducted by Swedish Gripen pilots from Saab and FMV. "


Iama

PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Stephen Dabapuscu
Posted on February 12, 2005 04:05 am
Quote Post


Sergent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Member No.: 440
Joined: January 05, 2005



Why is Romania wasteing so much time? Romania needs a better fighter then the ageing Mig-21. The SAAB JAS-39 Gripen should be exactly what the Romanian Air Force needs to maintain Air Superiority. A purchase of about 48 Gripen's will be a good start, perhaps later on, a follow order 48 or more may be possible. The Gripen will help the Romanian AF become a first rate air arm.

Thank You
PMEmail Poster
Top
mabadesc
Posted on February 12, 2005 07:40 am
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 803
Member No.: 40
Joined: July 11, 2003



It has recently been released that last September (2004), Israeli F-16 jets shot down 2 Syrian Mig-29's in a dogfight over the Mediterranean Sea.

One Mig was shot down by a Python-4 missile, while the other was destroyed with an AIM-9M Sidewinder.

In response, the Syrian President has intensified efforts to acquire an advanced anti-aircraft system.

I guess those crappy old F-16's can still kick some ass.

Source: http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/0...3413.05625.html
PM
Top
alexkdl
Posted on February 12, 2005 11:56 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 1809
Member No.: 373
Joined: October 22, 2004



Lavi was not killed by the US but by lack of fundings and mainly by IAF who didn't want to the type as being way too expensive design !!


Alex
PM
Top
alexkdl
Posted on February 12, 2005 11:58 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 1809
Member No.: 373
Joined: October 22, 2004



Can you tell me where did you hear about the 2 MIG's shot down by IAF ? This starnge newpaper tells about an incident in 2001 and NOT 2004..if at all...on both cases I havent heard any details......finally your " old crappy" F-16's are Block 40,50 and even Block 60's F-16I .

Even the older Block-30 F-16's which some of them are on storage now and rest used for operational and advanced pilot course ..are still better equipped than the rest of the F-16's you know....but since you guys are guessing a lot on here ..I am not guided by guessing neither by stuff that flies left and right on the air but things I know for sure

Alex

This post has been edited by alexkdl on February 14, 2005 07:30 pm
PM
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (61) « First ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... Last » Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0161 ]   [ 17 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]