Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (6) « First ... 4 5 [6]   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Georgia vs. Russia
Iamandi
Posted: August 20, 2008 01:29 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004



Not a single quote from wikipedia, today? tongue.gif

Iama biggrin.gif
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Hadrian
Posted: August 20, 2008 05:20 pm
Quote Post


Sergent major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 245
Member No.: 875
Joined: April 09, 2006



A lot of the russians look to have old uniforms, not the standard "Flora" camouflage pattern wich is in use today.

http://www.kamouflage.net/country/00156.php

Are this conscripts, "freedom fighters", "volunteers"?

This post has been edited by Hadrian on August 20, 2008 10:28 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
Victor
Posted: August 20, 2008 07:11 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



A post was deleted.

Let's try to keep this discussion serious.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Imperialist
Posted: August 22, 2008 07:55 am
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



What is the economic situation in Georgia now?

The economy must be completely stalled with Georgia's ports, railways and roads blockaded, destroyed or out of its control. And Georgia is still in a state of war (if I remember correctly that decision was not turned down and is supposed to last 2 months). Which means another drain on the economy.

How long before people turn against Saakashvili. Maybe that is what the Russians are hoping for and why they are taking so much time to completely withdraw.



--------------------
I
PM
Top
Hadrian
Posted: August 22, 2008 09:40 am
Quote Post


Sergent major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 245
Member No.: 875
Joined: April 09, 2006



I don`t think peeople will turn against Saakashvili. Instead his suport increased. Even the oposition stands now by his side, and not criticising his actions.
People will always unite against a foreign invasion. It is the best propaganda asset you can have. wink.gif
Remember how the russians were willing to die by millions in frontal assaults in WW2, altough they were protecting the same regime that sent millions of them to death in gulags.

On the other side, Saakashvili`s support was explicitely affirmed also externaly.
If the purpose of Russia was to bring him down, they really failed.

What will happen now is that EU peacekeeping forces will be installed, while euroatlantic integration of Gorgia will be accelerated. After admission, the russians will kindly be invited out. biggrin.gif

And Eu will really have to put itself togheter to increase its energy independence.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Imperialist
Posted: August 22, 2008 10:48 am
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



QUOTE (Hadrian @ August 22, 2008 09:40 am)
I don`t think peeople will turn against Saakashvili. Instead his suport increased. Even the oposition stands now by his side, and not criticising his actions.
People will always unite against a foreign invasion. It is the best propaganda asset you can have. wink.gif


It certainly looks that way.

But it depends whether they can hold that unity under economic pressure. Back in 1999 Serbia's economy was in shambles after the bombing campaign. Eventually the people went into the street and toppled Milosevic with his regime forces standing by and allowing it.


--------------------
I
PM
Top
cnflyboy2000
Posted: August 26, 2008 02:06 am
Quote Post


Plutonier adjutant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 371
Member No.: 221
Joined: February 18, 2004



QUOTE (Imperialist @ August 22, 2008 03:48 pm)
QUOTE (Hadrian @ August 22, 2008 09:40 am)
I don`t think peeople will turn against Saakashvili. Instead his suport increased. Even the oposition stands now by his side, and not criticising his actions.
People will always unite against a foreign invasion. It is the best propaganda asset you can have. wink.gif


It certainly looks that way.

But it depends whether they can hold that unity under economic pressure. Back in 1999 Serbia's economy was in shambles after the bombing campaign. Eventually the people went into the street and toppled Milosevic with his regime forces standing by and allowing it.

Sorry I missed this thread until now; wow! many excellent posts!

IMO, this invasion (or counterinvasion) and now "withdrawal" is a "game changer"; Russia is back!

They may not look all that impresssive (scruffy troops, dented trucks, questionable command and control performance, etc), but they made their statement, for sure.

I think it was interesting timing: a bald attempt to steal the spotlight from the true new power, China, and put a stick in the eye of the old ones. The question is what happens now? I'll be surprised if they succeed in unhorsing Saakashvili; he's no Milosevic, and the parade of U.S./E.U. big gun diplomats into the country (culminating this week with the arrival of v.p. Dick "kickass" Cheney) says a line has been drawn in the sand somewhere.

We are in the middle of a new "Great Game". As I write this, I'm watching a new U.S. president being nominated. Whichever one wins, it's unlikely he will be holding hands with Putin & Co. anytime soon.

cheers, all




PMYahoo
Top
Victor
Posted: August 26, 2008 02:31 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



I was intrigued how come you missed this one.

It's official now. Russia recognized the independence of Abkhazia and Southern Ossetia: BBC

Trans-Dnestra is probably next.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
C-2
Posted: August 26, 2008 08:42 pm
Quote Post


General Medic
Group Icon

Group: Hosts
Posts: 2453
Member No.: 19
Joined: June 23, 2003



And in a few years every street will be an independent state....
PMUsers Website
Top
Imperialist
Posted: August 27, 2008 07:02 am
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



Did you see this Saakashvili statement:

QUOTE

“We had a choice here,” he said. “We could turn this country into Chechnya — we had enough people and equipment to do that — or we had to do nothing and stay a modern European country.”

He added: “Eventually we would have chased them away, but we would have had to go to the mountains and grow beards. That would have been a tremendous national philosophical and emotional burden.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/25/world/eu.../25georgia.html

Some could understand from this that a modern European country does nothing when it faces aggression.


--------------------
I
PM
Top
dead-cat
Posted: September 01, 2008 09:08 am
Quote Post


Locotenent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 559
Member No.: 99
Joined: September 05, 2003



on the other hand, what's the point of waging a war you know you'll lose from start?
PMYahoo
Top
Hadrian
Posted: September 01, 2008 06:03 pm
Quote Post


Sergent major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 245
Member No.: 875
Joined: April 09, 2006



Knowing the one you attack will fight back hard is a strong detterent, even for a stronger force. No one wants his electors to see bodies in bags on tv, and the dead`s moms will protest on the streets and cry in front of cameras. Veery bad...

Also when you fight and are defeated you can later cry the treaty of peace was imposed with the gun at your temple and reject it at a later point, when situation is diferent wink.gif

And you can go to guerilla warfare when you are ocuppied. After one year the ocuppant will be thinking strongly to find a way out. Think Vietnam, Afghanistan.

And the last but not the least honor.
PMEmail Poster
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (6) « First ... 4 5 [6]  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0120 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]