Me-109 G-6 Ion Galea (1 red), Me-109 G-6 Ion Galea (1 red) |  |  |
| Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines |
 Help
 Search
 Members
 Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (2) 1 [2] ( Go to first unread post ) |    |
Me-109 G-6 Ion Galea (1 red), Me-109 G-6 Ion Galea (1 red)| masm_71 |
Posted: November 24, 2008 08:38 am
|
||||
|
Soldat  Group: Members Posts: 11 Member No.: 2307 Joined: November 12, 2008  |
Hi, Mr. Cantacuzino. OK. I think so. Well, now know all I need to paint correctly my (your) Me-109. THANK'S A LOT TO ALL FOR YOUR HELP. Regadard from Spain. Miguel Sánchez - Spain (España) |
||||
 
|
| Kroat |
Posted: December 08, 2008 09:09 am
|
||
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 5 Member No.: 2273 Joined: October 12, 2008 |
Hello to you all, It looks more to me that this could be a very late Erla production G-14. Werknummer 465540 or 465548?! best regards, Tomislav |
||
|
|
| Radub |
Posted: December 08, 2008 09:44 am
|
||
 General de corp de armata  Group: Members Posts: 1670 Member No.: 476 Joined: January 23, 2005 |
Not really historically possible. The G14 was intorduced in late summer 1944. By that stage, Romania was no longer allied with Germany and they could not have been supplied with G14s. The camouflage is extremely smilar to the camouflage applied to Bf109G6 manufactured by Mtt. Regensburg (see the preserved aircraft in Australia, covered in "Augsburg's Last eagles" by Brett Green), so it may be an aicraft from the 165000-166000 series. Radu |
||
|
| Kroat |
Posted: December 24, 2008 08:57 pm
|
||
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 5 Member No.: 2273 Joined: October 12, 2008 |
Hello Radu, You are right, ofcourse. In that case it should be WNr.165540 or 165540. The known losses in the 166xxx block indicate that there were no aircraft beyond the WNr.166495. |
||
|
|
| Dénes |
Posted: December 25, 2008 08:49 am
|
||||
 Admin  Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
It's either, or neither. 
I have two losses beyond it, W. Nr. 166549 and 166644. The Rumanians also had a few Gustavs beyond that number. Of course, any of these constr. nos. could be typos. Gen. Dénes P.S. Are you Tomislav?  This post has been edited by Dénes on December 25, 2008 08:50 am |
||||
|
|
| Kroat |
Posted: December 26, 2008 05:20 pm
|
||||
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 5 Member No.: 2273 Joined: October 12, 2008 |
Argh, yes! I ment WNr.165540 or 165548  Yes, I'm Tomislav, hello Dénes! |
||||
|
|
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Pages: (2) 1 [2] |
|
[ Script Execution time: 0.0079 ] [ 14 queries used ] [ GZIP Enabled ]
Powered by Invision Power Board(U) v1.3.1 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.