Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (3) 1 [2] 3   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Time for Russia to join NATO, German defense experts
ANDREAS
Posted: March 20, 2010 05:48 pm
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Member No.: 2421
Joined: March 15, 2009



QUOTE
(my own [Romanian] cousin (a girl):
-believes Romanians are a bunch of assholes,
-does not give a damn about Romania or going there...
-does not want to have Romanian friends, or interesting in socializing with them..
-does not want to have children,
-and if Romania (and everything that has ever been Romanian... for a good few thousand years was to go up tomorrow in a big Nuclear cloud,.... she wouldn't even shed a tear)...

Anton88,
I also know examples like that, when meeting Romanians in Austria and Germany, but what I learned from that, is that our duty (us who are not ashamed to be Romanian) to "educate" our relatives, friends and acquaintances about our country and nation. If we fail, there is no misfortune, but we must not remain silent and tacitly endorse such an attitude... I think that if we are ashamed of our nation, is like being ashamed of our parents and our grandparents, and with that of our own existence! In any case, I think we can change things and our destiny, if we truly want that and if we believe in it and put into practice our faith!
PMEmail PosterYahoo
Top
ANDREAS
Posted: March 20, 2010 06:17 pm
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Member No.: 2421
Joined: March 15, 2009



....to return to the matter I will say that long as the United States are leading the NATO, pro-Russian interest groups, essentially western European, will not be able to impose their ideas, representing the interests of some states (Germany, France, Italy, ...) against the interests of others (Poland, Romania, Baltic States, maybe Hungary). I am sure about that!
PMEmail PosterYahoo
Top
Anton88
Posted: March 20, 2010 07:09 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 34
Member No.: 2762
Joined: March 16, 2010



QUOTE (MMM @ March 20, 2010 04:39 pm)
Putting aside some ramblings on this topic, I think we should all be clear upon some simple things:
1. We (Romania) cannot, would not and should not be America or Russia, because of our history, geography, mentality and not least sheer number of people
2. Alliances were and are necessary for all countries, even USSR and USA; of course, asymetric alliances, but still...
3. NATO, right now -and in the next decade - doesn't have nor the intention nor the reason to invite Russia "in".
Please argue those things above...
wink.gif

You're definitely right about point # 3.

NATO was built as an alliance (led by America) to keep the Russians out of Europe... forever.
ie:.. to keep the Russians out, to keep the Germans down, & to keep Americans in-
(their own words)

So I'm not surprised when Putin had asked why and if Russia can join NATO... and was denied
PMEmail Poster
Top
Hadrian
Posted: March 21, 2010 11:27 am
Quote Post


Sergent major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 245
Member No.: 875
Joined: April 09, 2006



Russia joining NATO would be a good thing, that will bring stability in the European Zone. The problem regarding this ascension is the fact that Russia is substandard in various criterias, like democracy, human rights, rule of law, exactly the standards that NATO protects. This evolution might be posible in future, if the russians wake up and change their leadership with people with different mentality. Military sphears of influence are a thing of the past, now everything is economics...
PMEmail Poster
Top
MMM
Posted: March 21, 2010 01:29 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1463
Member No.: 2323
Joined: December 02, 2008



blink.gif So? D'ya think that Russian economic hegemony is different from the old concepts? blink.gif
And I'm not sure we should think as the US strategists when regarding Russia; they have and always had their own particular way of dealing with the neighbouring areas of interest... ohmy.gif
BTW, what will Poland and the Baltic states say about that? 'Cause
QUOTE
stability in the European Zone
is a thing achieved usually by consensus, not in other ways and consensus is best realised when facing an enemy (or a threat) together. Russia may be the very stimulus for the cohesion of NATO in Europe, because the Muslim threat is perceived as too distant / too abstract by many of the members.


--------------------
M
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Anton88
Posted: March 21, 2010 11:35 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 34
Member No.: 2762
Joined: March 16, 2010



QUOTE (Hadrian @ March 21, 2010 11:27 am)
Russia joining NATO would be a good thing, that will bring stability in the European Zone. The problem regarding this ascension is the fact that Russia is substandard in various criterias, like democracy, human rights, rule of law, exactly the standards that NATO protects. ...

I think what the US is really after is Nationalism...

The Americans fear Nationalism like the Devil fears Holy Water... ph34r.gif


ph34r.gif


To a "country" who sees itself like the Modern Roman Empire, anybody who is different or thinks different, or does different is a Barbarian who has not accepted "Roman Law", who is Resisting "Our ways" and who must be "Pacified"...and "civilized"

Its good if there is some sort of balance of arms, then if a single faction rules the whole world, it become an arrogant power who does what it wants

This post has been edited by Anton88 on March 21, 2010 11:44 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
Hadrian
Posted: March 22, 2010 05:44 pm
Quote Post


Sergent major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 245
Member No.: 875
Joined: April 09, 2006



Truth is, should Russia join NATO somwhere in future, US will lose almost imediatly most of its influence in Europe. They are not needed from economic point of view (they are also a little competition for EU states) and they will also no more be needed from a military point of view, because the russians are the only ones that can pose some kind of threat to european states.

BTW, if we make the sum of the military of EU states, than EU is the superpower of our days, bigger than Russia or US.

This post has been edited by Hadrian on March 22, 2010 05:45 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
MMM
Posted: March 22, 2010 07:20 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1463
Member No.: 2323
Joined: December 02, 2008



QUOTE (Hadrian @ March 22, 2010 05:44 pm)

BTW, if we make the sum of the military of EU states, than EU is the superpower of our days, bigger than Russia or US.

ohmy.gif ohmy.gif ohmy.gif
It doesn't work like that! If it did, than the Warsaw pact should've won the cold war; not to mention the fact that in the 50's, when China became communist, the "Red" side was far more numerous than the "capitalists"!
It's not just a question of numbers.


--------------------
M
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
guina
Posted: March 22, 2010 07:21 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 339
Member No.: 1393
Joined: April 16, 2007



Yeah,US gives about 20% of world GDP and RF about 2 %,of course US will lose all its economic influence in Europe in favour of RF.As for military power of EU,it doesn't look good ,even on paper,compared to US.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Hadrian
Posted: March 22, 2010 07:50 pm
Quote Post


Sergent major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 245
Member No.: 875
Joined: April 09, 2006



GDP of EU is bigger than GDP of US.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_count...y_GDP_(nominal)

and EU could practicaly buy RF off... tongue.gif

There is a push toward a common EU army, at least at declarative level. If it would hapen (somewhere in the distant future), this could work. Mostly because EU is not inclined to deploy its military overseas, so it doesn`t needs the projections capabilities of US.
PMEmail Poster
Top
guina
Posted: March 22, 2010 08:39 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 339
Member No.: 1393
Joined: April 16, 2007



Yes,indeed,26% of WGDP,with a population twice as big as US.Interesting,what will be the reaction of Europe's population if US will decide to retire ALL its military forces and nuclear umbrela from Europe ?
PMEmail Poster
Top
Hadrian
Posted: March 22, 2010 09:04 pm
Quote Post


Sergent major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 245
Member No.: 875
Joined: April 09, 2006



Hmmm... panic?
Or they will just not understand what`s happening or maybe won`t care, too preocupied with the cost of gasoline and their little mundane daily problems...

This post has been edited by Hadrian on March 22, 2010 09:05 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
cnflyboy2000
Posted: March 22, 2010 09:10 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier adjutant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 371
Member No.: 221
Joined: February 18, 2004



The TOTAL EU military budget is a fraction of that of the U.S. Where's the political will among Europeans to support an expansive military??? Not visible from here.

Europe postwar has voted consistently for butter, not guns. Does anyone argue that's changing?? The EU argument right now seems to be about saving the Greeks from themselves, not buying bullets.

And no way we (USA) are getting in bed with a corrupt police state (Russia) run by gangsters and saddled with a 19th century economy almost wholly dependent on resource extraction (oil/gas/minerals), thank you very much Herr Ruhe et al.
PMYahoo
Top
Stephen Dabapuscu
Posted: March 24, 2010 07:39 am
Quote Post


Sergent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Member No.: 440
Joined: January 05, 2005



QUOTE (cnflyboy2000 @ March 22, 2010 09:10 pm)
The TOTAL EU military budget is a fraction of that of the U.S.  Where's the political will among Europeans to support an expansive military???  Not visible from here.

Europe postwar has voted consistently for butter, not guns. Does anyone argue that's changing?? The EU argument right now seems to be about saving the Greeks from themselves, not buying bullets.

And no way we (USA) are getting in bed with a corrupt police state (Russia) run by gangsters and saddled with a 19th century economy almost wholly dependent on resource extraction (oil/gas/minerals), thank you very much Herr Ruhe et al.

Ok, your first two points are 100% correct! But your last point I have to take a problem with! What are you on? are serious? What gives you the right to be soo disrespectful to other nations and/ or there people's? Any way America is not only comically dumb! laugh.gif but corrupt, arrogant and amoral! The last real war the US fought (Vietnam) you lost, and the US still keeps the Native Americans on Reservations! So how about you shut up! laugh.gif

This post has been edited by Stephen Dabapuscu on March 24, 2010 07:47 am
PMEmail Poster
Top
guina
Posted: March 24, 2010 01:31 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 339
Member No.: 1393
Joined: April 16, 2007



To tell the truth is not beeing disrespectfull.And,yes,RF is a corupt,KGB run totalitarian state,with an antiquated economy and imperialistic policies. 20000 russians ,that ,for the first time,demonstrated,last week ( day of fury )in the streets of Russia,agree to this.You'll say that is a small number,yes,but is GROWING constantly ! Wach on 31 of March !
As for the second statement ............... Ahmadinejad puts it much better.
PMEmail Poster
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (3) 1 [2] 3  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0113 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]