Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (2) [1] 2 ( Go to first unread post ) |
Ferdinand |
Posted: March 04, 2010 08:26 pm
|
Maior Group: Members Posts: 721 Member No.: 1486 Joined: June 28, 2007 |
|
Alanmccoubrey |
Posted: March 04, 2010 08:31 pm
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 38 Member No.: 1520 Joined: July 28, 2007 |
That looks like an SU-100 to me.
|
Ferdinand |
Posted: March 04, 2010 09:09 pm
|
Maior Group: Members Posts: 721 Member No.: 1486 Joined: June 28, 2007 |
yes...thanks. i'm sure that's an su-100.
the wheels are different. any ideea where the different one came frome? thanks again |
zero |
Posted: March 15, 2010 07:35 am
|
Soldat Group: Banned Posts: 25 Member No.: 2253 Joined: September 22, 2008 |
may be from a T34 tank.
|
mihnea |
Posted: March 15, 2010 09:16 am
|
Capitan Group: Members Posts: 682 Member No.: 679 Joined: September 26, 2005 |
Su-100 is made on the T-34 chassis so it uses the same road wheels as the T-34. There are more types of road wheels used on the T-34 depending on the production year: rim with no holes (welded design) and rubber bandage, rim with holes (cast steel) and no rubber bandage, and rims with holes (cast steel) and rubber bandage.
|
Stephen Dabapuscu |
Posted: March 15, 2010 09:31 am
|
Sergent Group: Members Posts: 154 Member No.: 440 Joined: January 05, 2005 |
It is a SU-85, not a SU-100! The most important differance between the 2 models is the 85mm gun on the SU-85; while the SU-100 has a 100mm gun.
|
mihnea |
Posted: March 15, 2010 11:20 am
|
Capitan Group: Members Posts: 682 Member No.: 679 Joined: September 26, 2005 |
It's a Su-100, as the Su-85 has a square commanders cupola and the Su-100 has a round commanders cupola, very similar to the one on the T-34/85. Also the gun mantle is different on the Su-85 and the gun shorter (the same gun was used on the T-34/85).
Su-85: www.wargaming.net/ tanks/MODELS/su85_2.htm Su-100: http://www.wargaming.net/tanks/MODELS/su100_2.htm |
MMM |
Posted: March 15, 2010 01:15 pm
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 |
Indeed Su-100: the length of the barrel is consisting with the 100 mm. gun. By the way, it's not a tank, but a Self-Propelled Gun, ok?
-------------------- M
|
dead-cat |
Posted: March 15, 2010 01:45 pm
|
Locotenent Group: Members Posts: 559 Member No.: 99 Joined: September 05, 2003 |
actually an "assault gun".
|
MMM |
Posted: March 15, 2010 03:45 pm
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 |
This would be the Romanian and German translation, ok? Fair enough since the Germans invented the concept - although IMO this Su-100 is Russian! )
-------------------- M
|
dead-cat |
Posted: March 15, 2010 04:02 pm
|
Locotenent Group: Members Posts: 559 Member No.: 99 Joined: September 05, 2003 |
SP gun is something different. See "Wespe" or "Hummel".
|
MMM |
Posted: March 15, 2010 04:34 pm
|
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 |
Oh, yes... I forgot the difference between motorized artillery and the "tanks with fixed turret", 'cause I was paying attention to the linguistic aspect.
-------------------- M
|
dragos |
Posted: March 15, 2010 07:10 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 2397 Member No.: 2 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
"Self-propelled anti-tank gun" or "tank destroyer" would also be correct terms for SU-100.
|
ANDREAS |
Posted: March 15, 2010 07:23 pm
|
Locotenent colonel Group: Members Posts: 814 Member No.: 2421 Joined: March 15, 2009 |
The picture seems to show indeed an SU-100 self-propelled gun, and the Soviets used it as a mobile anti-tank artillery piece... was intended to support tank formations in battle, in independent units designed to counter the german Tiger and Panther tanks...
|
Iamandi |
Posted: March 21, 2010 07:12 am
|
||
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1386 Member No.: 319 Joined: August 04, 2004 |
Romanian SU-100 where not categorised as "autotunuri"? |
||
Pages: (2) [1] 2 |