Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (21) 1 [2] 3 4 ... Last »  ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> ARR photos on Ebay
Dénes
Posted: March 11, 2011 08:52 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE (Radub @ March 11, 2011 06:03 pm)
The crosses were not only assymetrical, but also of different sizes. This was a Polish fashion.

The ARR markings seem identical to me.

As for the camouflage colours, I would say exactly the opposite: the original dark green overall was overpainted with lighter colour squiggles (on wings only), including the earlier wing bands, too.

Gen. Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
bansaraba
Posted: March 11, 2011 09:15 pm
Quote Post


Sergent
*

Group: Members
Posts: 184
Member No.: 2196
Joined: July 20, 2008



What was YR-LEE used for?
PMEmail Poster
Top
muggs
Posted: March 11, 2011 09:22 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Retired
Posts: 298
Member No.: 1499
Joined: July 05, 2007



QUOTE (bansaraba @ March 11, 2011 11:15 pm)
What was YR-LEE used for?

Yeah i wanted to ask too, the paintjob is very rugged to say the least
PMEmail Poster
Top
horia
Posted: March 11, 2011 09:29 pm
Quote Post


Capitan
*

Group: Members
Posts: 693
Member No.: 529
Joined: February 28, 2005



PMEmail Poster
Top
Dénes
Posted: March 11, 2011 09:41 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE (bansaraba @ March 12, 2011 03:15 am)
What was YR-LEE used for?

For transport of military and civilian VIPs.

Gen. Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
muggs
Posted: March 11, 2011 09:42 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Retired
Posts: 298
Member No.: 1499
Joined: July 05, 2007



Guy in the middle looks funny for some reason..

And another plane..painted at the same lousy shop

user posted image

This post has been edited by muggs on March 11, 2011 09:43 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
Cantacuzino
Posted: March 12, 2011 04:09 am
Quote Post


Host
Group Icon

Group: Hosts
Posts: 2328
Member No.: 144
Joined: November 17, 2003



QUOTE
Yeah i wanted to ask too, the paintjob is very rugged to say the least


During the war all civilian transport planes were field camouflaged, mostly with green colour patches. Especially the shiney aluminum polished of Lokheed Electra.
Any way even with this cammo they were easy target for low alttitude attacks. On 10 june 44, P-38 Lightnings shot on the ground Lokheed Electra, Ju 52 and Savoia planes parked on Boteni airfield.
PM
Top
muggs
Posted: March 12, 2011 08:06 am
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Retired
Posts: 298
Member No.: 1499
Joined: July 05, 2007



Thanks for the explanations guys, YR-LEE must have been quite a "sight" painted with what appears to be green / white / rear part plain aluminium and the yellow band on top !

Here's the last pic i have from this "Fortsetzung" lot, an IAR 39

user posted image

PMEmail Poster
Top
Radub
Posted: March 12, 2011 10:17 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



QUOTE (Dénes @ March 11, 2011 08:52 pm)
The ARR markings seem identical to me.

As for the camouflage colours, I would say exactly the opposite: the original dark green overall was overpainted with lighter colour squiggles (on wings only), including the earlier wing bands, too.

Gen. Dénes

Please trust me Denes, the crosses are different sizes. As I said, it follows the Polish tradition of asymmetrical and odd-size markings on the upper wings of the PZL. The only thing that is unusual is the type of "stencil" King Michael Cross which saw quite limited/disparate use.

I cannot tell for sure what is going on with that camouflage, and there is a lot going on there, obviously a multitude of paints applied at different times and for different reasons. A certain amount of surmising has to suffice. wink.gif

Radu
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
mgc151184
Posted: March 12, 2011 11:56 am
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 43
Member No.: 552
Joined: March 30, 2005



QUOTE (Agarici @ March 11, 2011 10:08 am)
QUOTE (muggs @ March 10, 2011 03:23 pm)

user posted image


A P 11 f with the Michael Cross painted over the asymetrically placed roundels... awsome! But is it in green or in cammo livery?

Another picture of the same plane, PZL 11F nr.116.
Source: www.odkrywca.pl

user posted image

http://img218.imageshack.us/i/pzl11fnr11602.jpg

This post has been edited by mgc151184 on March 12, 2011 12:17 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
Agarici
Posted: March 12, 2011 12:54 pm
Quote Post


Maior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Member No.: 522
Joined: February 24, 2005



This is closest contemporary P 11 shot I ever saw.

Concerning the painting, could it had been done right after switching from roundels to Michael’s Crosses, or in a sort of “transitional time” - the fuselage cross missing since there was not, until after August 1944, a roundel in that position?

About the crosses, they do look kind of strange and I think might be unequal in shape. I was always puzzled about the Polish fashion with the asymmetrically placed marking (on the upper wings only?). Am I wrong or it was abandoned by the Poles before 1939? I remember seeing some photos with PZLs from September 1939 which had the “national grids” (btw, was there an official name for them?) painted symmetrically. Were they supposed to be unequal in size too, as a rule? And, most of all, was there any logic behind this? It looks really ugly to me…
PMEmail Poster
Top
Radub
Posted: March 12, 2011 04:46 pm
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



There was no "transitional" period in the application of the crosses. They were introduced in May 1941 by official order. However, the PZL11 is not really a good yardstick for standard markings because after a short period of usage during Barbarossa they were delegated to training duties. It is very likely that aviation schools used some kind of temporary washable training markings to denote various teams such as "aggressors" and "defenders" during exercises. Because such temporary markings were not regulated by official orders, they are very hard to figure out. This use of temporary markings may explain the presence of the Eastern Front and prewar bands and the absence of crosses on the fuselage.

The cross is not "weird". This type of cross was mostly associated with Esc.53Vt. but it was also used on some other aircraft such as He.111 bombers ( the wings only). Such crosses saw very limited use amd are the closest rendition of "Cifra Regala a MS Regele Mihai I al Romanilor".

The assymetrical and odd Polish "checquerboard" was applied on the upper surfaces of wings to confuse gunners who use markings as aiming references. It did not really work... The assymetrical markings seem to have been used mostly on gull-winged fighters. All books on PZL fighters feature photos of such markings.

Hth
Radu
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Radub
Posted: March 12, 2011 05:55 pm
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



I ran a couple of measurements on this photo taking wing features as measurement aids. Denes is right, the crosses are equal in size, they are just offset. Apologies. sad.gif
Radu
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Tommy
Posted: March 12, 2011 06:02 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 40
Member No.: 1373
Joined: April 05, 2007



Nice to see some nice ARR photos. I search and collect ARR Photos -> and now you see some of my collections...ARR Planes to get very hard to find but sometimes i have luck.
PMEmail Poster
Top
muggs
Posted: March 14, 2011 11:01 am
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Retired
Posts: 298
Member No.: 1499
Joined: July 05, 2007



Possibly pre-war ?

user posted image

PMEmail Poster
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (21) 1 [2] 3 4 ... Last » Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0120 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]