Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (10) « First ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... Last »  ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> 1st December 1918, how it was made the union with Romania
Agarici
Posted: December 22, 2011 11:54 pm
Quote Post


Maior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Member No.: 522
Joined: February 24, 2005



QUOTE (Radub @ December 22, 2011 08:47 am)
QUOTE (Agarici @ December 21, 2011 07:58 pm)

   On topic, I think that it is already obvious that 1 December was the equivalent of a referendum, organized ahead of its time in regard to what could be called by then "democratic mechanisms".

21 Inf,
Actually NO, it has been amply demonstrated that this had absolutely nothing to do with a "referendum". And most of the evidence of the contrary has been provided by you.

It is evident that you think that such a "grand" event needs a "grand" label. It is also evident that you think that "referendum" is such a "grand" word as a symbol of "democracy". "Referendums" have nothing to do with democracy, they were used by all kinds of forms of government, from the cruelest dictatorships to what may appear to be democracies.

You can paint a Dacia Solenza red and decorate it with a prancing horse, and you may even manage to convince a few that you have a Ferrari, but the majority of the people will see it for what it is. Calling it a "referendum" is the same thing.

What happened on 1 December was a "proclamation". You may think that this word is not "powerful" enough. But the concept of "proclamation" goes back to the Roman Empire and is powerful enough.

Radu


Outstanding judgment, breath-taking example. Dude, you should really improve your Wikipedia search skills or find some alternative sources. A bit of formal logic won't hurt either. I'm also out of this mockery of a discussion.

This post has been edited by Agarici on December 23, 2011 12:15 am
PMEmail Poster
Top
ANDREAS
Posted: December 22, 2011 11:59 pm
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Member No.: 2421
Joined: March 15, 2009



I agree with Agarici,
in this regard please read the following comment that talks also about the Austro-Hungarian electoral system:
http://www.zoltech.net/h/portrait.html
QUOTE
The legitimacy of power was twofold: it was based on liberal principles and, at the same time, on the feudal concept of investing power by God' s grace. The latter was represented by the existence of the monarch, who maintained a real role and not merely a simple formality. This was partly insured by laws, such as the one decreeing the joint army, and partly by custom and the cult of loyalty, and most importantly by the existence of common public affairs which resulted from the structure of the Mo-narchy. The ruler was the one stable point in a liberal whirl of politics. He remained while governments and deputies came and went, the essence of liberal legitimacy being the elections which were held periodically. In Hungary, MPs were re-elected every third year until 1887 and every fifth year after that.
Members of the Upper House in the bi-cameral Parliament were chosen exclusively by birth until 1886. Later, however, they could also be nominated by the monarch. There were 19 governments from 1867 to 1918, when the Monarchy broke up, and nobody could have kept track of all the MPs over that period. At every election 413 members were returned to Parliament by the people or, more precisely, by a narrow segment of voters, which totalled about 6% of the total population. (In Europe, at the turn of the century, this proportion was 27% in Austria, 22% in Germany, 28% in France, 16% in England and 8% even in Italy where there was a limited franchise.) It was also true that the political structure could not really be tinkered with, if the opposition came to power (which happened only once, in 1906), it could only govern in the same manner as its predecessors. Therefore, Parliament usually signified a special mixture of un-principled support of government and blustering opposition to the public. The different types were even given popular names: Mameluks and Zoltans, respectively. The franchise, which was reformed in 1874, remained practically unchanged until the end of the Monarchy and, together with the highly disproportionate constituencies after their redistribution in 1877, left little or no illusion about the liberal ethos of popular representation. The open elections, the limited franchise and the disproportionate constituencies often led to corruption and bribery. Instead of representing the interests of others, the parliamentary system had the role of conservation, in effect of confirming the monarch' s authority.
PMEmail PosterYahoo
Top
ANDREAS
Posted: December 23, 2011 12:40 am
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Member No.: 2421
Joined: March 15, 2009



The comparison with Austria-Hungary is useful because Hungary led by Mihaly Karolyi had continued the policy of defunct Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, to maintain the integrity of the Hungarian State! Read this : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mih%C3%A1ly_K%C3%A1rolyi


PMEmail PosterYahoo
Top
Radub
Posted: December 23, 2011 09:37 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



QUOTE (Agarici @ December 22, 2011 11:54 pm)

    Outstanding judgment, breath-taking example. Dude, you should really improve your Wikipedia search skills or find some alternative sources. A bit of formal logic won't hurt either. I'm also out of this mockery of a discussion.


Play the ball not the player.

I have no idea why you keep referring me to Wikipedia. My "source" is my law professor. What is your "source"? I do not know anything about your credentials or even your education, but I studied constitutional law and as it happens I know exactly what a "referendum" is. I explained it clearly. Where did you explain it? Instead of giving explanations you mock?

Looking at the "new book in my library" thread, 21Inf has tens upon tens of books about 1 December. All he nees to do is to scan the poster, leaflet, invitation, propaganda, whatever, that uses the word "referendum", or a scan of the "terms and conditions" that make this a "refeendum", or scan the "ballot paper". Until then, he is using the word "referendum" without any reason or excuse.

As Denes said, this is a history forum. Let us talk history, not nationalism.

Radu

edited by admin

This post has been edited by dragos on December 23, 2011 03:25 pm
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Agarici
Posted: December 23, 2011 10:40 am
Quote Post


Maior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Member No.: 522
Joined: February 24, 2005



Nevertheless, I end the "discussion" here, because it has reached (courtesy to you, but not for the first time) new records of law standards. Have a nice day, dude!

edited by admin

This post has been edited by dragos on December 23, 2011 03:26 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
Imperialist
Posted: December 23, 2011 11:22 am
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



Report filed by German consul in Brasov to Chancelor Max von Baden (November 8, 1918):

QUOTE
În privinţa formei pe care o va lua mai târziu Transilvania, pare să existe oarecare neclaritate. Opinia dominantă este că, în caz că nu revine României, i se va asigura - raliată la Ungaria - o situaţie specială şi autonomie într-o Federaţie statală ungară. Hotărâtori în această privinţă vor fi în orice caz românii care, numeric, alcătuiesc pe departe majoritatea populaţie.

Pentru Transilvania, s-a format un Consiliu Naţional Român propriu, cu sediul la Arad, iar în ultima duminică, o subsecţie la Cluj, la care au apărut delegaţi din toate părţile Transilvaniei. Adunarea a luat hotărârea ca naţiunea română din Transilvania să ţină neclintit la dreptul sfânt de a-şi decide ea însăşi propria soartă. Hotărârea asupra viitoarei apartenenţe statale a întregului popor român rămâne rezervată exclusiv Adunării Naţionale Române.


http://www.cimec.ro/Istorie/Unire/ardeal.htm#Ra

This post has been edited by Imperialist on December 23, 2011 11:23 am


--------------------
I
PM
Top
Radub
Posted: December 23, 2011 12:36 pm
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



QUOTE (Agarici @ December 23, 2011 10:40 am)
...

There is not one single word you said here that is fair or true...
Radu

edited by admin

This post has been edited by dragos on December 23, 2011 03:27 pm
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
dragos
Posted: December 23, 2011 03:28 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 2397
Member No.: 2
Joined: February 11, 2003



Gentlemen, please refrain from personal attacks.
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Victor
Posted: December 23, 2011 06:37 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



It's almost Christmas Eve. Even the Germans and the French buried the hatchet for this occasion in the trenches in 1914.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Agarici
Posted: December 23, 2011 06:54 pm
Quote Post


Maior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Member No.: 522
Joined: February 24, 2005



That's true, Victor. Merry Christmas everyone!
PMEmail Poster
Top
MMM
  Posted: December 23, 2011 07:07 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1463
Member No.: 2323
Joined: December 02, 2008



QUOTE (Victor @ December 23, 2011 09:37 pm)
It's almost Christmas Eve. Even the Germans and the French buried the hatchet for this occasion in the trenches in 1914.

OoT:
1. "almost" is the key-word
2. The German-French feud is nothing compared to the Romanian-Romanian feud...
Now, really, Merry Christmas to everyone!


--------------------
M
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
ANDREAS
Posted: December 23, 2011 09:03 pm
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Member No.: 2421
Joined: March 15, 2009



Merry Christmas! I wish to all members and all their loved ones! May God enlighten our minds and hearts!
PMEmail PosterYahoo
Top
Dénes
Posted: December 24, 2011 07:56 am
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



Indeed, merry Christmas to everyone!

I believe, if we'd sit down to a beer, we'd discover that we, Transylvanians, have much more in common than separates us. Pending that all parties (Rumanians, Hungarians, Szeklers, Saxons, Jews, etc.) acknowledge the others have a right to be integral part of the history of Transylvania and would look at our common history with an open mind, free of dogmatisms.

So, I wish all of you in in a transylvanian spirit:
Craciun fericit!
Boldog Karacsonyt!
Frohe Weihnachten!


Gen. Dénes

This post has been edited by Dénes on December 24, 2011 09:36 am
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Agarici
Posted: December 24, 2011 02:37 pm
Quote Post


Maior
*

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Member No.: 522
Joined: February 24, 2005




Off-topic:

Transylvanians… I’d say more than that, I think our identity is not complete without “the other”.

Long time ago, I was returning home from my first (long) stay abroad. I had to cancel a plane ticket and then to take a bus for Budapest, the closest destination to Romania available. I started to feel “at home” when, with the ticket in my hand and asking for the bus destination, the trip attendant answered, with Hungarian accent, “Budapeşt”.

This post has been edited by Agarici on December 24, 2011 02:40 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
21 inf
Posted: December 24, 2011 05:44 pm
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Retired
Posts: 1512
Member No.: 1232
Joined: January 05, 2007



Off topic:

Some years ago being on the other side of the world with a number of fellow romanians, some of them went drunk. Of course they started to sing "Noi suntem români", "Treceţi batalioane..." and other stuff like this. After few minutes, they stoped, saying that it's no fun to sing something like this when everybody around us was or black, or indian, chinese or God knows what. Actually, my fellows started to miss the hungarians and thought how nice is back in Transylvania, whith all our goods and bads biggrin.gif So, one needs to go far away for sometime to realise that "rău cu rău, dar mai rău fără rău".

Merry Christmas to all of you!

Bogdan
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (10) « First ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... Last » Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0110 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]