Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
cipiamon |
Posted: January 29, 2004 09:44 pm
|
Sublocotenent Group: Members Posts: 471 Member No.: 115 Joined: October 06, 2003 |
Where has the "Bf 110 C werknr" the fuel tank?
I am trying to reconstruct the crash of Marin Ghica (1 august 1943 Bolintin Vale, hit by a Liberator) and i heard he was burned on his heands, the cockpit was in flames, but how is that posible? He jumped whit his para very close to the earth but they found him buned on his body, expecialy the heands. |
C-2 |
Posted: January 30, 2004 08:54 pm
|
General Medic Group: Hosts Posts: 2453 Member No.: 19 Joined: June 23, 2003 |
The 110 had 2 fuel tanks in the wings and a central one in front of the pilot.
|
cipiamon |
Posted: January 30, 2004 09:23 pm
|
Sublocotenent Group: Members Posts: 471 Member No.: 115 Joined: October 06, 2003 |
Thanks!
Must it been the central one that chought fire and burned Marin Ghica |
Florin |
Posted: January 30, 2004 10:52 pm
|
General de corp de armata Group: Members Posts: 1879 Member No.: 17 Joined: June 22, 2003 |
Messerchmidt 110 was a great expectation when it was designed and issued to Luftwaffe. Maybe especially because it was a great expectation, it was then a big dissapointment.
At the eve of the war all major aerial fleets tried twin-engined designs as fighters (the Germans, the Japanese, the Americans, the Britons). The hopes were that these twin engined birds could carry heavier weaponry, and could have longer range. Then it was obvious for all that the one motor, one plane wing, one pilot plane was the king of the battles, mostly because of its maneuvrability. |
dragos |
Posted: January 30, 2004 10:57 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 2397 Member No.: 2 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
I agree, it was the time of light fighters and heavy bombers. Some notable differences: Stuka and British "Mosquito".
|