Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
clujanul |
Posted: January 30, 2004 09:10 am
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 2 Member No.: 208 Joined: January 27, 2004 |
Afther 1942 all airplane IAR-80 was retaired from front, and replaced with IAR-81. So, begining this period all airplane are IAR-81 BOPI.I make an interwiew with Mr. Radu Tberiu, fighter pilot of Grupul 6 Vanatoare, and instructor at Galati Fighter School. He have few magnificent photos from that period. If is somebody interested....
Title edited by Dénes |
cipiamon |
Posted: January 30, 2004 09:33 am
|
Sublocotenent Group: Members Posts: 471 Member No.: 115 Joined: October 06, 2003 |
Good, i think everybody is interested about info on ARR
So can you scan the pictures? |
C-2 |
Posted: January 30, 2004 08:51 pm
|
General Medic Group: Hosts Posts: 2453 Member No.: 19 Joined: June 23, 2003 |
Make contact with Victor,we'll be happy to put the interwiu on the site
|
Florin |
Posted: January 30, 2004 11:12 pm
|
||
General de corp de armata Group: Members Posts: 1879 Member No.: 17 Joined: June 22, 2003 |
The previous sentences can also be understood that the photos may be for sale. Obviously, things will be clarified by the following posts. |
||
Québec |
Posted: January 31, 2004 04:54 am
|
Fruntas Group: Members Posts: 65 Member No.: 197 Joined: January 18, 2004 |
Very interesting indeed!!!!!!!! It will be usefull for modeling!
|
Victor |
Posted: February 02, 2004 02:39 pm
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
Not exactly, the IAR-80s was still in service even in fighting units, until 1944. |
||
Der Maresal |
Posted: February 13, 2004 07:35 pm
|
Sublocotenent Group: Banned Posts: 422 Member No.: 21 Joined: June 24, 2003 |
Just slightly off topic- but not worth opening a new thread.
To Victor and Denes: On www.arr.go.roin the Airplanes section I believe there is a small 'innacuracy' with regard to the armament of the Me-109E3 and E7. I studied this a bit, and I have books to prove- the 109E3 (the typical Battle of Britain Fighter) has only 1 Cannon [in the nose] and not 3 as you say! So the the Messerschmitt 109E-3 had a 20mm in the Nose, two MG's on the Engine and another 2 MG's in the Wings ~ they were not cannon but regualr MG's. Same for the E7 version. The Messerschmitt 109E-4 had NO cannon in the nose but had 2 20mm in the Wings. In total two Machine Guns on the Engine, and two Cannons in the Wings. I don't think there were any Messerschmitts E's, with 3 Cannons. Later the "Gustav" could have underwing Cannon Pods attached - but were not mounted internally "inside the wing" of the aircraft. If you look closely, (this being the 109E-3 Version) you can see the thin barrels in the wings. These are not 20mm, - they are MG 17's. I can give reference to the book that confirms my story. Thank you Victor and Denes for your time. |
Bernard Miclescu |
Posted: February 13, 2004 10:07 pm
|
Plutonier major Group: Members Posts: 335 Member No.: 53 Joined: July 22, 2003 |
Hi Der Mareshal,
I think that your studied books were quite wrong.... The version with four MG 17 machine guns and a cannon of 20 mm was the E-2 not the E-3. The E-3 had two MG17 7,92 mm machine guns above the engine and two MG/FF 20 mm cannons in the wings (plus a 20 mm canon in the nose at the beggining of the production) The nose canons of the E-2 and E-3 made a lot of problems to the planes so there were litteraly took off. The E-7 version had a similar armement like the E-3 (the nose cannon beeing written off a new cowl was installed). (cf Messerschmitt Me 109 vol 1 by A Elbied & A Jouineau at histoire&collections editions) Yours, BM |
Bernard Miclescu |
Posted: February 13, 2004 10:14 pm
|
Plutonier major Group: Members Posts: 335 Member No.: 53 Joined: July 22, 2003 |
I forgot to tell that at the beggining the E-3 had 3 cannons one in the propeller (nose) and two in the wings each with 60 projectiles. The nose cannon was abandoned because of the vibrations made by the fire.
yours, BM |
Der Maresal |
Posted: February 14, 2004 07:17 pm
|
Sublocotenent Group: Banned Posts: 422 Member No.: 21 Joined: June 24, 2003 |
[quote]Hi Der Mareshal,
I think that your studied books were quite wrong.... The version with four MG 17 machine guns and a cannon of 20 mm was the E-2 not the E-3. The E-3 had two MG17 7,92 mm machine guns above the engine and two MG/FF 20 mm cannons in the wings ........[/quote] Hi Bernard, If the E3 has 2 Machine Guns and 2 Cannons then why would the E4 have the Exact same armament? It is well known that the Messerschmitt 109E-4 had Two MG17 on the Engine, and two MG/FF 20mm in the Wings, with the Nose Cannon deleated. Why would the E3 be the exact same? :shock: |
Victor |
Posted: February 14, 2004 07:59 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
Diferences between different sub-types were not given just by the armament.
|
Bernard Miclescu |
Posted: February 16, 2004 12:26 am
|
Plutonier major Group: Members Posts: 335 Member No.: 53 Joined: July 22, 2003 |
hi der Mareshal,
Like Victor said it wasn't only the armement that differed from the E-3 and E-4. Take a care look to the canopy and you will see some differences between the E-4 and E-3. Also at the E-4 the hub gun didn't exist any more (normaly the E-3 were delivered with this problem cannon but it was written off from the most of the E-3 models) Some changes on the pilots "chair" also. Yours, BM |
Der Maresal |
Posted: February 16, 2004 06:29 pm
|
Sublocotenent Group: Banned Posts: 422 Member No.: 21 Joined: June 24, 2003 |
Was the IAR-80 equipped with an Automatic Fire-Extinguisher?
In the image below you can clearly see "Extinctor Automat" written on one of the upper-left pannel instruments. (I only know Russian TB-3 has autmatic fire extinguisher in the engines (with multiple charges). But a figher plane... :shock: http://www.il2center.com/Axis/Romania/01/I...kpit_photos.jpg |