Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines | Help Search Members Calendar |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (3) [1] 2 3 ( Go to first unread post ) |
Dénes |
Posted: December 01, 2003 06:00 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
I found the image of a 221-year-old British map, which shows 'Romania' located south of Bulgaria, on the southwestern shores of the Black Sea. See image:
It's obviously an error, but what could be the source? |
Geto-Dacul |
Posted: December 01, 2003 06:57 pm
|
Plutonier adjutant Group: Members Posts: 383 Member No.: 9 Joined: June 18, 2003 |
It's not an error, Dénes! During medieval times, Byzantine and Ottoman Thracia was also called "Romania" (the name of the Eastern Roman Empire), because of the great number of Vlachs living there, and the central administrative center which was Constantinople (the "new Rome"). eventually, with the creation of a Bulgarian state, that "Romania" disapeared, with the majority of the Vlachs there.
http://www.friesian.com/romania.htm Getu' |
Victor |
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:05 pm
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
Actually it was called Romania because the Byzantines (the term "Byzantine" was introduced by modern historians) called themselves "Romans", not because there were so many Vlachs there. |
||
Geto-Dacul |
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:14 pm
|
||
Plutonier adjutant Group: Members Posts: 383 Member No.: 9 Joined: June 18, 2003 |
Victor wrote :
After the death of the Thracian emperor Phocas, a sery of Greek dynasties took the power, beginning with emperor Heraclius. The Eastern Roman Empire ceased to be "Roman", and became "Greek". But the Westerners continued to call it "Roman Empire". The Greeks called themselves "Romei". Follis with emperor Phocas (602-610) Source : http://www.pdxcoinclub.org/gallery/AeFolli...lis_Phocas.html |
||
Victor |
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:16 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
An how is this different from what I said?
|
Korne |
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:17 pm
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 31 Member No.: 28 Joined: July 06, 2003 |
Maybe this is a confusion with Rumelia (spelled also as Roumelia), which corresponds to that particular region on the map.
|
Geto-Dacul |
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:19 pm
|
Plutonier adjutant Group: Members Posts: 383 Member No.: 9 Joined: June 18, 2003 |
Rumelia is the Turkish name for "Romania"... Just like Istanbul is for "Constantinople"...
Victor, when the pope Inocentius III converted Ionita Caloian to the Catholic faith, from only then those Vlachs were considered as "Rome's descendents", and the region were Caloian ruled was named "Romania" by the Westerners. Getu' |
Korne |
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:27 pm
|
||
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 31 Member No.: 28 Joined: July 06, 2003 |
Didn't know that, Getule... That explains it then |
||
Victor |
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:39 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 |
The Asans never ruled that area on the map (Contantinople).
I was referring to the fact that the Byzantines (ethnical Greeks) considered themselves Romans and called themsellves this way. |
Carol I |
Posted: December 01, 2003 09:42 pm
|
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
I have found this piece of information about Rumelia on the net. It creates the impression that historically Rumelia was centred around Sofia.
Carol I |
Dénes |
Posted: December 01, 2003 09:42 pm
|
||
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
Thanks for the interesting details. I learned quite a few things. So this is probably why the English spell the current country's name 'Rumania', as to avoid confusion with the above-described historical 'Romania'... |
||
Carol I |
Posted: December 01, 2003 09:49 pm
|
||
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2250 Member No.: 136 Joined: November 06, 2003 |
Actually I heard many British saying that "Rumania" is the old way of spelling the name of the country, while the correct one now is "Romania". In fact I had to remind them of the spelling with "u" and they replied something along the lines "Oh really, I think I have seen it only in some old papers. Anyhow, no one uses it anymore." And if BBC still maintains the tradition of "Queen's English", ROMANIA must be the correct way of spelling the name now. Carol I |
||
Dénes |
Posted: December 01, 2003 10:21 pm
|
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 |
This issue was discussed and settled here earlier.
In short, both the classical 'Rumania' and the recently used 'Romania' spelling forms are correct and accepted in the contemporary UK English language. |
Geto-Dacul |
Posted: December 01, 2003 11:53 pm
|
||||
Plutonier adjutant Group: Members Posts: 383 Member No.: 9 Joined: June 18, 2003 |
Victor wrote :
Indeed, Constantinople remained under "latine" hands until the Paleologus dynasty chased them... But Thracia with its capital at Andrinople, was controled for a period of time by the Asans. Dénes wrote :
If you want so :wink: I too would prefere more "Rumania" than "Romania"! Getu' |
||||
Chandernagore |
Posted: December 03, 2003 09:13 pm
|
||
Locotenent colonel Group: Banned Posts: 818 Member No.: 106 Joined: September 22, 2003 |
As Dénes said. Both spellings are accepted and correct in English. You will find Rumania quite often. |
||
Pages: (3) [1] 2 3 |